Contralateral osteotomy of the pedicle and posterolateral elements for en bloc resection: a technique for oncological resection of posterolateral spinal tumors.

En bloc resection of tumors involving the spinal column is technically challenging and is associated with high morbidity to the patient due to the proximity of critical neurological and vascular structures and the destabilizing nature of this surgery. Nevertheless, evidence has shown improved progression-free survival with en bloc resection for certain low-grade malignant and aggressive benign musculoskeletal tumors. To avoid the morbidity of en bloc spondylectomy in patients with tumors localized to the lateral and posterolateral spinal column, the authors have found that the goals of surgery can be accomplished through a contralateral osteotomy of the pedicle and posterolateral elements for en bloc resection (COPPER). They reviewed their series of 5 patients who underwent successful tumor removal through a COPPER approach. These patients were all found to harbor spinal column tumors involving the posterolateral elements that, based on pathology, would benefit from en bloc resection. Tumor pathology included chondrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, osteoblastoma, and liposarcoma. Resections were performed by completing ipsilateral facetectomies above and below the lesion and ipsilateral pedicle osteotomies from a contralateral approach following hemilaminectomy. By disarticulating the posterolateral elements while carefully protecting the thecal sac, the tumors were removed en bloc along with the affected lamina, pedicles, pars interarticularis, and spinous processes, allowing tumor-free margins. This technical report suggests that the COPPER approach is safe and effective for en bloc resection of tumors involving the posterolateral aspect of the spinal column with tumor-free margins and that it eliminates the need for anterior column reconstruction.

[1]  K. Fujii [Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School]. , 2018, No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery.

[2]  X. Liu,et al.  An Approach to Primary Tumors of the Upper Cervical Spine With Spondylectomy Using a Combined Approach: Our Experience With 19 Cases , 2018, Spine.

[3]  C. Fisher,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life After Spine Surgery for Primary Bone Tumour , 2016, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[4]  T. Witham,et al.  Surgical Outcomes in Patients with High Spinal Instability Neoplasm Score Secondary to Spinal Giant Cell Tumors , 2015, Global spine journal.

[5]  A. Cañete,et al.  Primary bone tumors of the spine. , 2016, Radiologia.

[6]  S. Boriani,et al.  En bloc resections for primary spinal tumors in 20 years of experience: effectiveness and safety. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  C. Mazel,et al.  Long-term quality of life after en-bloc vertebrectomy: 25 patients followed up for 9 years. , 2014, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[8]  C. Ames,et al.  En Bloc Resection for Primary and Metastatic Tumors of the Spine: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[9]  S. Boriani,et al.  Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[10]  L. Rhines,et al.  Feasibility and Safety of En Bloc Resection for Primary Spine Tumors: A Systematic Review by the Spine Oncology Study Group , 2009, Spine.

[11]  Ziya L Gokaslan,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following En Bloc Resections for Sacral Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas: A Series of Twenty Consecutive Patients , 2009, Spine.

[12]  Z. Gokaslan,et al.  Surgery for primary vertebral tumors: en bloc versus intralesional resection. , 2008, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[13]  A. Ogose,et al.  Margin-Free Spondylectomy for Extended Malignant Spine Tumors: Surgical Technique and Outcome of 13 Cases , 2007, Spine.

[14]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Chordoma of the Mobile Spine: Fifty Years of Experience , 2006, Spine.

[15]  K. Tomita,et al.  Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: improvement of the technique and its associated basic background , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[16]  C. Fisher,et al.  The Surgical Management of Primary Tumorsof the Spine: Initial Results of an Ongoing Prospective Cohort Study , 2005, Spine.

[17]  G. Gallia,et al.  En bloc resection of primary sacral tumors: classification of surgical approaches and outcome. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[18]  H. Baba,et al.  Total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary spinal metastases , 1994, International Orthopaedics.

[19]  K. Tomita,et al.  Total En Bloc Spondylectomy , 2001, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[20]  P. Mccormick Sacral Chordoma: 40-Year Experience at a Major Cancer Center , 1999 .

[21]  G. Fuller,et al.  Sacral chordoma: 40-year experience at a major cancer center. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[22]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Primary Bone Tumors of the Spine: Terminology and Surgical Staging , 1997, Spine.

[23]  H. Baba,et al.  Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. , 1997 .

[24]  K. Tomita,et al.  Total en bloc spondylectomy and circumspinal decompression for solitary spinal metastasis , 1994, Paraplegia.

[25]  B. Stener Complete removal of vertebrae for extirpation of tumors. A 20-year experience. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[26]  T. Judet,et al.  [Total excision of thoracic vertebrae (author's transl)]. , 1981, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[27]  B. Stener Total spondylectomy in chondrosarcoma arising from the seventh thoracic vertebra. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.