Fundamental performance comparison of a Hartmann and a shearing interferometer wave-front sensor.

The performance of ground-based optical imaging systems is severely degraded from the diffraction limit by the random effects of the atmosphere. Adaptive-optics techniques have been used to compensate for atmospheric-turbulence effects. A critical component in the adaptive-optics system is the wave-front sensor. At present, two types of sensors are common: the Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor and the shearing interferometer wave-front sensor. In this paper we make a direct performance comparison of these two sensors. The performance calculations are restricted to common configurations of these two sensors and the fundamental limits imposed by shot noise and atmospheric effects. These two effects encompass the effects of extended reference beacons and sensor subaperture spacings larger than the Fried parameter r(0). Our results indicate comparable performance for good seeing conditions and small beacons. However, for poor seeing conditions and extended beacons, the Hartmann sensor has lower error levels than the shearing interferometer.

[1]  D. Fried,et al.  Image-position error associated with a quadrant detector , 1982 .

[2]  Chester S. Gardner,et al.  Wavefront Detector Optimization For Laser Guided Adaptive Telescopes , 1989, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[3]  J. W. Hardy,et al.  Active optics: A new technology for the control of light , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  R. Noll.  Zernike polynomials and atmospheric turbulence , 1976 .

[5]  R. Parenti,et al.  Laser-guide-star system for astronomical applications , 1994 .

[6]  Kim A. Winick,et al.  Cramér–Rao lower bounds on the performance of charge-coupled-device optical position estimators , 1986 .

[7]  Chester S. Gardner,et al.  Performance analysis of adaptive-optics systems using laser guide stars and slope sensors. , 1989 .

[8]  E. P. Wallner.  Optimal wave-front correction using slope measurements , 1983 .

[9]  B. Welsh,et al.  Design and performance analysis of adaptive optical telescopes using lasing guide stars , 1990, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  Todd K. Barrett,et al.  Shearing interferometry for laser-guide-star atmospheric correction at large D/r 0 , 1994 .

[11]  J. Goodman,et al.  Limitations of fringe-parameter estimation at low light levels* , 1973 .

[12]  James M. Spinhirne,et al.  Two generations of laser-guide-star adaptive-optics experiments at the Starfire Optical Range , 1994 .

[13]  G. Heidbreder,et al.  Image degradation with random wavefront tilt compensation , 1967 .

[14]  J. Wyant.  Use of an ac heterodyne lateral shear interferometer with real-time wavefront correction systems. , 1975, Applied optics.

[15]  F Roddier,et al.  Curvature sensing and compensation: a new concept in adaptive optics. , 1988, Applied optics.

[16]  D. Fried.  Optical Resolution Through a Randomly Inhomogeneous Medium for Very Long and Very Short Exposures , 1966 .