Tubulin Bond Energies and Microtubule Biomechanics Determined from Nanoindentation in Silico

Microtubules, the primary components of the chromosome segregation machinery, are stabilized by longitudinal and lateral noncovalent bonds between the tubulin subunits. However, the thermodynamics of these bonds and the microtubule physicochemical properties are poorly understood. Here, we explore the biomechanics of microtubule polymers using multiscale computational modeling and nanoindentations in silico of a contiguous microtubule fragment. A close match between the simulated and experimental force–deformation spectra enabled us to correlate the microtubule biomechanics with dynamic structural transitions at the nanoscale. Our mechanical testing revealed that the compressed MT behaves as a system of rigid elements interconnected through a network of lateral and longitudinal elastic bonds. The initial regime of continuous elastic deformation of the microtubule is followed by the transition regime, during which the microtubule lattice undergoes discrete structural changes, which include first the reversible dissociation of lateral bonds followed by irreversible dissociation of the longitudinal bonds. We have determined the free energies of dissociation of the lateral (6.9 ± 0.4 kcal/mol) and longitudinal (14.9 ± 1.5 kcal/mol) tubulin–tubulin bonds. These values in conjunction with the large flexural rigidity of tubulin protofilaments obtained (18,000–26,000 pN·nm2) support the idea that the disassembling microtubule is capable of generating a large mechanical force to move chromosomes during cell division. Our computational modeling offers a comprehensive quantitative platform to link molecular tubulin characteristics with the physiological behavior of microtubules. The developed in silico nanoindentation method provides a powerful tool for the exploration of biomechanical properties of other cytoskeletal and multiprotein assemblies.

[1]  Marileen Dogterom,et al.  Force generation by dynamic microtubules. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  Fred C. MacKintosh,et al.  Microtubule elasticity: connecting all-atom simulations with continuum mechanics. , 2010 .

[3]  J. McIntosh,et al.  In search of an optimal ring to couple microtubule depolymerization to processive chromosome motions , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Omkaram Nalamasu,et al.  Fatigue resistance of aligned carbon nanotube arrays under cyclic compression. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[5]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  J. McIntosh,et al.  A molecular-mechanical model of the microtubule. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Aleksei Aksimentiev,et al.  Mechanical properties of a complete microtubule revealed through molecular dynamics simulation. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[8]  E. Nogales,et al.  Comparative studies of microtubule mechanics with two competing models suggest functional roles of alternative tubulin lateral interactions. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[9]  D. Odde,et al.  Estimates of lateral and longitudinal bond energies within the microtubule lattice , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  P. Atzberger,et al.  Spectral analysis methods for the robust measurement of the flexural rigidity of biopolymers. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[12]  David J Odde,et al.  Microtubule Assembly Dynamics: New Insights at the Nanoscale This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cell Structure and Dynamics Edited Microtubule Dynamics at the Nanoscale Mechanochemical Coupling at the Microtubule Plus-end , 2022 .

[13]  E. Nogales,et al.  Simulations of Tubulin Sheet Polymers as Possible Structural Intermediates in Microtubule Assembly , 2009, PloS one.

[14]  J. Apostolakis,et al.  Evaluation of a fast implicit solvent model for molecular dynamics simulations , 2002, Proteins.

[15]  F. Perez,et al.  Interplay between microtubule dynamics and intracellular organization. , 2012, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[16]  J. Ross,et al.  Microtubule-severing enzymes at the cutting edge , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[17]  D. Baker,et al.  High-Resolution Microtubule Structures Reveal the Structural Transitions in αβ-Tubulin upon GTP Hydrolysis , 2014, Cell.

[18]  D. Odde,et al.  Mechanochemical model of microtubule structure and self-assembly kinetics. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[19]  A. Kovalenko,et al.  Microtubule stability studied by three-dimensional molecular theory of solvation. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[20]  E. Nogales,et al.  High-Resolution Model of the Microtubule , 1999, Cell.

[21]  M. Caplow,et al.  The free energy for hydrolysis of a microtubule-bound nucleotide triphosphate is near zero: all of the free energy for hydrolysis is stored in the microtubule lattice [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1995 Apr;129(2):549] , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Thermal fluctuations of grafted microtubules provide evidence of a length-dependent persistence length , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Dissecting the kinematics of the kinesin step. , 2012, Structure.

[24]  Marileen Dogterom,et al.  Microtubule organization in vitro. , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[25]  J. Howard,et al.  Microtubule dynamic instability: A new model with coupled GTP hydrolysis and multistep catastrophe , 2013, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[26]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerization in vitro , 1988, Nature.

[27]  Martin Hoefling,et al.  Barnase-Barstar: from first encounter to final complex. , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[28]  T. Davis,et al.  Kinetochores' gripping feat: conformational wave or biased diffusion? , 2011, Trends in cell biology.

[29]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  The Free Energy Profile of Tubulin Straight-Bent Conformational Changes, with Implications for Microtubule Assembly and Drug Discovery , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  A. Khodjakov,et al.  Mechanisms of chromosome behaviour during mitosis , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[32]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  The physical basis of microtubule structure and stability , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  J J Correia,et al.  Thermodynamic and structural analysis of microtubule assembly: the role of GTP hydrolysis. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[34]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Force production by disassembling microtubules , 2005, Nature.

[35]  A. Zhmurov,et al.  Generation of random numbers on graphics processors: forced indentation in silico of the bacteriophage HK97. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[36]  David J. Odde,et al.  Rapid Microtubule Self-Assembly Kinetics , 2011, Cell.

[37]  D. Pellman,et al.  Move in for the kill: motile microtubule regulators. , 2012, Trends in cell biology.

[38]  Changbong Hyeon,et al.  Pathways and kinetic barriers in mechanical unfolding and refolding of RNA and proteins. , 2006, Structure.

[39]  R. Dima,et al.  Probing the origin of tubulin rigidity with molecular simulations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  G. Voth,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent lateral and longitudinal interactions in microtubules. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  J Richard McIntosh,et al.  Tubulin depolymerization may be an ancient biological motor , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[42]  Francesco Pampaloni,et al.  Microtubule Architecture: Inspiration for Novel Carbon Nanotube-based Biomimetic Materials , 2022 .

[43]  J. McIntosh,et al.  4.7 Force Generation by Dynamic Microtubule Polymers , 2012 .

[44]  T. Mitchison,et al.  Microtubule polymerization dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[45]  S. Fuller,et al.  Structure of growing microtubule ends: two-dimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  E. Nogales,et al.  Refined structure of alpha beta-tubulin at 3.5 A resolution. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  Anatoly V. Zaytsev,et al.  Long tethers provide high-force coupling of the Dam1 ring to shortening microtubules , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Christoph F Schmidt,et al.  Elastic response, buckling, and instability of microtubules under radial indentation. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  New insights into the mechanism of protein–protein association , 2001, Proteins.

[50]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Parametrized Models of Aqueous Free Energies of Solvation Based on Pairwise Descreening of Solute Atomic Charges from a Dielectric Medium , 1996 .

[51]  B. Mickey,et al.  Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[52]  V Barsegov,et al.  Sop‐GPU: Accelerating biomolecular simulations in the centisecond timescale using graphics processors , 2010, Proteins.

[53]  J. Howard,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[54]  Changbong Hyeon,et al.  Mechanical control of the directional stepping dynamics of the kinesin motor , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Force production by depolymerizing microtubules: a theoretical study. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  André E. X. Brown,et al.  Mechanism of fibrin(ogen) forced unfolding. , 2011, Structure.

[57]  E. Salmon,et al.  Mechanisms of force generation by end-on kinetochore-microtubule attachments. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[58]  D. Compton,et al.  Kinetochores and disease: keeping microtubule dynamics in check! , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[59]  J. Tuszynski,et al.  Analysis of the strength of interfacial hydrogen bonds between tubulin dimers using quantum theory of atoms in molecules. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[60]  G. Voth,et al.  Intrinsic bending of microtubule protofilaments. , 2011, Structure.

[61]  Olga Kononova,et al.  Structural transitions and energy landscape for Cowpea Chlorotic Mottle Virus capsid mechanics from nanomanipulation in vitro and in silico. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[62]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Deformation and collapse of microtubules on the nanometer scale. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[63]  E. Mandelkow,et al.  Microtubule dynamics and microtubule caps: a time-resolved cryo- electron microscopy study , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[64]  Mishal N. Patel,et al.  Anisotropic elastic network modeling of entire microtubules. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[65]  R. Nicklas Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.