Using e-petition data to quantify public concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study of England

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on society and many governments and politicians were required to make quick decisions to protect public health. In reaching these decisions they needed to weigh advice from experts in many fields and then "sell” these decisions. However little was known at the time about the desires and aspirations of their electorates. Here we identify one such source of public opinion, signatures to various COVID-19 related Parliamentary e-petitions Whilst there were over 1,500 such e-petitions, we identify 27 common and meaningful topics and show how the strength of these topics varies between individual parliamentary constituencies. Using a measure of support for each topic in the constituencies we identify five constituency groupings. There are two Conservative voting groups, "Middle England” and "Equity of Support”, the former are located largely in southern England whilst the latter are in the midlands and northern England. The groups that show strong support in Labour voting constituencies are ones around education and funding issues. This article shows how a targeted range of e-petitions can be grouped into topics and the popularity of topics established, and thereby function as a useful way of augmenting democracy and democratic institutions. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

[1]  D. Carpenter Agenda Democracy , 2022, Annual Review of Political Science.

[2]  A. Buguet,et al.  Covid-19: Early Cases and Disease Spread , 2022, Annals of global health.

[3]  Btihaj Ajana,et al.  Perceptions and attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccines: narratives from members of the UK public , 2022, Journal of Public Health.

[4]  J. Wise Covid-19: Omicron sub variants driving new wave of infections in UK , 2022, BMJ.

[5]  Felicity Matthews Between everyday politics and political elites: transmission and coupling within Westminster’s parliamentary e-petitions system , 2022, British Politics.

[6]  R. Egger,et al.  A Topic Modeling Comparison Between LDA, NMF, Top2Vec, and BERTopic to Demystify Twitter Posts , 2022, Frontiers in Sociology.

[7]  E. Dorostkar,et al.  How to evaluate urban emotions using twitter social media? , 2022, Cities.

[8]  D. Gurdasani,et al.  The government wants us to learn to live with covid-19, but where is the learning? , 2022, BMJ.

[9]  D. Mallinson,et al.  Disproportionate policy dynamics in crisis and uncertainty: an international comparative analysis of policy responses to COVID-19 , 2022, Policy Studies.

[10]  Hugh Alderwick Is the NHS overwhelmed? , 2022, BMJ.

[11]  Sumit S. Deole,et al.  Home sweet home: Working from home and employee performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK , 2021, Labour Economics.

[12]  N. Zahariadis,et al.  Policy styles and political trust in Europe’s national responses to the COVID-19 crisis , 2021, Policy Studies.

[13]  A. Torrens-Burton,et al.  ‘It was brutal. It still is’: a qualitative analysis of the challenges of bereavement during the COVID-19 pandemic reported in two national surveys , 2021, medRxiv.

[14]  O. van Hecke,et al.  Primary care preparedness for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a survey of NHS GPs , 2021, Family practice.

[15]  D. Harrington,et al.  Changes in commuting behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK , 2021, Journal of Transport & Health.

[16]  M. Kan,et al.  The varying impacts of COVID-19 and its related measures in the UK: A year in review , 2021, PloS one.

[17]  H. Bedford,et al.  National survey of attitudes towards and intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: implications for communications , 2021, BMJ Open.

[18]  Paul Chaney,et al.  Exploring the Substantive Representation of Non-Humans in UK Parliamentary Business: A Legislative Functions Perspective of Animal Welfare Petitions, 2010–2019 , 2021, Parliamentary Affairs.

[19]  J. Sanders,et al.  “Anxious and traumatised”: Users’ experiences of maternity care in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Midwifery.

[20]  Andrew C. Eggers,et al.  Rallying in fear? Estimating the effect of the UK COVID‐19 lockdown with a natural experiment , 2021, European journal of political research.

[21]  N. Ellis,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on women's pregnancy and postpartum experience in England: A qualitative exploration , 2021, Midwifery.

[22]  S. Reicher,et al.  The potential impact of vaccine passports on inclination to accept COVID-19 vaccinations in the United Kingdom: Evidence from a large cross-sectional survey and modeling study , 2021, EClinicalMedicine.

[23]  Stephanie Pywell,et al.  Love in the time of Covid-19: a case-study of the complex laws governing weddings , 2021, Legal Studies.

[24]  D. Moynihan,et al.  Trump’s (mis)management of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US , 2021, Policy Studies.

[25]  A. Majeed,et al.  Covid-19 vaccine passports: access, equity, and ethics , 2021, BMJ.

[26]  T. Cohen,et al.  Test, trace, and isolate in the UK , 2021, BMJ.

[27]  A. Steptoe,et al.  Public opinion about the UK government during COVID-19 and implications for public health: A topic modeling analysis of open-ended survey response data , 2021, medRxiv.

[28]  P. Cairney,et al.  The COVID-19 exams fiasco across the UK: four nations and two windows of opportunity , 2021, British Politics.

[29]  Weiqi Jiang,et al.  Campaign-style crisis regime: how China responded to the shock of COVID-19 , 2021, Policy Studies.

[30]  R. Vickerman Will Covid-19 put the public back in public transport? A UK perspective , 2021, Transport Policy.

[31]  J. Vencovský,et al.  Plasma Hsp90 levels in patients with systemic sclerosis and relation to lung and skin involvement: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[32]  David Sheldon Policing the Pandemic: Maintaining Compliance and Legitimacy during Covid-19 , 2021 .

[33]  Sotirios Thanos,et al.  Forced homeward: the COVID-19 implications for housing , 2020, Town Planning Review: Volume 92, Issue 1.

[34]  N. Gatto,et al.  Topic Analysis of Traditional and Social Media News Coverage of the Early COVID-19 Pandemic and Implications for Public Health Communication , 2020, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.

[35]  M. Brewer,et al.  Did the UK policy response to Covid-19 protect household incomes? , 2020, The Journal of Economic Inequality.

[36]  E. Carafoli,et al.  History of the COVID-19 pandemic: Origin, explosion, worldwide spreading , 2020, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

[37]  Felicity Matthews The value of ‘between-election’ political participation: Do parliamentary e-petitions matter to political elites? , 2020, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.

[38]  P. Cairney The UK government’s COVID-19 policy: assessing evidence-informed policy analysis in real time , 2020, British Politics.

[39]  M. Nyashanu,et al.  Triggers of mental health problems among frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in private care homes and domiciliary care agencies: Lived experiences of care workers in the Midlands region, UK. , 2020, Health & social care in the community.

[40]  D. Houston Local resistance to rising unemployment in the context of the COVID‐19 mitigation policies across Great Britain , 2020 .

[41]  C. Hall,et al.  COVID-19 and international travel restrictions: the geopolitics of health and tourism , 2020, Tourism Geographies.

[42]  J. Lazarus,et al.  COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10) , 2020, PloS one.

[43]  Stephen D. Clark,et al.  Linguistic and semantic factors in government e-petitions: A comparison between the United Kingdom and the United States of America , 2020, Gov. Inf. Q..

[44]  Jack Blumenau Online Activism and Dyadic Representation: Evidence from the UK E‐Petition System , 2020 .

[45]  C. Goodman,et al.  THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN UK CARE HOMES – REVEALING THE CRACKS IN THE SYSTEM , 2020, The Journal of Nursing Home Research Sciences.

[46]  J. Bryson,et al.  COVID‐19, Virtual Church Services and a New Temporary Geography of Home , 2020, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie = Journal of economic and social geography = Revue de geographie economique et humaine = Zeitschrift fur okonomische und soziale Geographie = Revista de geografia economica y social.

[47]  P. Anand,et al.  Covid-19 And The Uk Labour Market , 2020, Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

[48]  Chen Chen,et al.  Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[49]  Brendan J. Carroll,et al.  Government capacity, societal trust or party preferences: what accounts for the variety of national policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe? , 2020, Journal of European Public Policy.

[50]  A. Sayburn Are UK doctors getting sufficient protective equipment against covid-19? , 2020, BMJ.

[51]  K. Jeffery,et al.  Challenges for NHS hospitals during covid-19 epidemic , 2020, BMJ.

[52]  Taha Yasseri,et al.  What, when and where of petitions submitted to the UK government during a time of chaos , 2019, Policy Sciences.

[53]  Jesse Heley,et al.  Volunteering in the bath? The rise of microvolunteering and implications for policy , 2019, Policy Studies.

[54]  Martin Almbjär The problem with early-modern petitions: safety valve or powder keg? , 2019, European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire.

[55]  Cristina Leston-Bandeira,et al.  Do Parliamentary Debates of e-Petitions Enhance Public Engagement With Parliament? An Analysis of Twitter Conversations , 2019, Policy & Internet.

[56]  Loni Hagen,et al.  Content analysis of e-petitions with topic modeling: How to train and evaluate LDA models? , 2018, Inf. Process. Manag..

[57]  Scott A. Hale,et al.  How digital design shapes political participation: A natural experiment with social information , 2018, PloS one.

[58]  Stephen Clark,et al.  Classification of Westminster Parliamentary constituencies using e-petition data , 2017, EPJ Data Science.

[59]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Early detection of promoted campaigns on social media , 2017, EPJ Data Science.

[60]  Loni Hagen,et al.  E-petition popularity: Do linguistic and semantic factors matter? , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[61]  C. Bochel Process matters: petitions systems in Britain’s legislatures , 2016 .

[62]  Danny MacKinnon,et al.  Devolution, state restructuring and policy divergence in the UK , 2015 .

[63]  Malika Charrad,et al.  NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set , 2014 .

[64]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion? , 2011, Journal of Classification.

[65]  Jan-Hinrik Schmidt,et al.  On the Use of the E-Petition Platform of the German Bundestag , 2014 .

[66]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  topicmodels : An R Package for Fitting Topic Models , 2016 .

[67]  Henrik Serup Christensen Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? , 2011, First Monday.

[68]  Sheng Tang,et al.  A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[69]  Gwilym Dodd Justice and grace , 2007 .

[70]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.