Barriers Associated With Door-to-Balloon Delay in Contemporary Japanese Practice.

BACKGROUND Door-to-balloon (DTB) time ≤90 min is an important quality indicator in the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but a considerable number of patients still do not meet this goal, particularly in countries outside the USA and Europe.Methods and Results:We analyzed 2,428 STEMI patients who underwent primary PCI ≤12 h of symptom onset who were registered in an ongoing prospective multicenter database (JCD-KiCS registry), between 2008 and 2013. We analyzed both the time trend in DTB time within this cohort in the registry, and independent predictors of delayed DTB time >90 min. Median DTB time was 90 min (IQR, 68-115 min) during the study period and there were no significant changes with year. Predictors for delay in DTB time included peripheral artery disease, prior revascularization, off-hour arrival, age >75 years, heart failure at arrival, and use of IABP or VA-ECMO. Notably, high-volume PCI-capable institutions (PCI ≥200/year) were more adept at achieving shorter DTB time compared with low-volume institutions (PCI <200/year). CONCLUSIONS Half of the present STEMI patients did not achieve DTB time ≤90 min. Targeting the elderly and patients with multiple comorbidities, and PCI performed in off-hours may aid in its improvement.

[1]  Neel M. Butala,et al.  Association of Guideline-Based Admission Treatments and Life Expectancy After Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  J. D. de Lemos,et al.  The Association of Previous Revascularization With In-Hospital Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: Results From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  H. Miyata,et al.  An international comparison of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A collaborative study of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) and Japan Cardiovascular Database-Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies (JCD-KiCS). , 2015, American heart journal.

[4]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Relation between door-to-balloon times and mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention over time: a retrospective study , 2015, The Lancet.

[5]  Leora I. Horwitz,et al.  Association of hospital volume with readmission rates: a retrospective cross-sectional study , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Kristine M. Thompson,et al.  Off-hour presentation and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  J. Messenger,et al.  Lower Hospital Volume Is Associated With Higher In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the NCDR , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[8]  John S Rumsfeld,et al.  Door-to-balloon time and mortality among patients undergoing primary PCI. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  R. Swaminathan,et al.  Nonsystem reasons for delay in door-to-balloon time and associated in-hospital mortality: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  塩見 紘樹 Association of onset to balloon and door to balloon time with long term clinical outcome in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction having primary percutaneous coronary intervention : observational study , 2013 .

[11]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[12]  Takeshi Kimura,et al.  Current treatment of ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Japan: door-to-balloon time and total ischemic time from the J-AMI registry , 2013, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

[13]  Naoki Ikegami,et al.  Japanese universal health coverage: evolution, achievements, and challenges , 2011, The Lancet.

[14]  Jodi Thomson,et al.  System Delay and Mortality among Patients with STEMI Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2011 .

[15]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Relationship between hospital volume and outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2011, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[16]  Thomas D. Scott,et al.  Predictors of reperfusion delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. , 2010, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  H. Gurm,et al.  Trends in door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, Archives of internal medicine.

[18]  M. Jeong,et al.  Suboptimal use of evidence-based medical therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry: prescription rate, predictors, and prognostic value. , 2010, American heart journal.

[19]  Elisa M. Dannemiller Association of Hospital Primary Angioplasty Volume in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Quality and Outcomes , 2010 .

[20]  C. Davis Prehospital Delay in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events [GRACE]) , 2009 .

[21]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Association of door-to-balloon time and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with ST elevation myocardial infarction: national cohort study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Regionalization of care for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: is it too soon? , 2008, Annals of emergency medicine.

[23]  W. Weaver,et al.  Trends in reperfusion strategies, door-to-needle and door-to-balloon times, and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction from 1990 to 2006. , 2008, American heart journal.

[24]  K. Eagle,et al.  Trends in acute reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from 1999 to 2006: we are getting better but we have got a long way to go. , 2008, European heart journal.

[25]  J. Cigarroa,et al.  Treatment delay in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a key process analysis of patient and program factors. , 2008, American heart journal.

[26]  H. Krumholz,et al.  A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon: An Alliance for Quality. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[27]  Peter Moyer,et al.  Recommendation to Develop Strategies to Increase the Number of ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With Timely Access to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2006, Circulation.

[28]  T. Isshiki,et al.  Rates of primary percutaneous coronary intervention worldwide. , 2005, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[29]  L. Parsons,et al.  Hospital outcomes in patients presenting with congestive heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2). , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  P. Touboul,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study , 2002, The Lancet.

[31]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Predictors of door-to-balloon delay in primary angioplasty. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  W. Rogers,et al.  The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.