Air-Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Part IV: Airframe Shadowing

Applications of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are expected to expand dramatically in the coming decades. In order to provide safe and reliable links for UAS, NASA Glenn Research Center sponsored a measurement campaign in 2013 to characterize air-ground (AG) channels. In the first three of our AG channel characterization series papers, path loss, small scale fading, stationarity distance, root mean square (RMS) delay spread, spatial correlations, and tapped delay line models were presented for a range of ground site environment. In this paper, we expand the results to a unique and little-studied characteristic of the AG channels—airframe shadowing—for a medium-sized aircraft. Airframe shadowing occurs when the line-of-sight signal is obstructed by the airplane itself in some specific maneuvers. Based on over 200 aircraft wing/engine shadowing events in both C-band (5060 MHz) and L-band (968 MHz) collected in the measurement campaign, shadowing depth, duration, multiple antenna diversity gain, and small scale fading results and their statistics are reported. Algorithms are proposed to simulate a random shadowing event based upon shadowing depth and duration cumulative density functions. Airframe shadowing characteristics are independent of the local ground site conditions and link distance. The shadowing loss is modeled as a function of aircraft roll angle, but shadowing loss and duration are essentially uncorrelated. The maximum shadowing loss measured was over 35 dB and the duration was up to 74 s. As expected, deployment of multiple aircraft antennas is shown helpful to mitigate this shadowing.

[1]  Axel Jahn,et al.  Narrow- and wide-band channel characterization for land mobile satellite systems: Experimental results at L-band , 1995 .

[2]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Part II: Hilly and Mountainous Settings , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  David W. Matolak,et al.  L- and C-band airframe shadowing measurements and statistics for a medium-sized aircraft , 2017, 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[4]  Yu Song Meng,et al.  Study of shadowing effect by aircraft maneuvering for air-to-ground communication , 2012 .

[5]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Spatial and frequency correlations in two-ray air-ground SIMO channels , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Ruoyu Sun,et al.  Dual-band non-stationary channel modeling for the air-ground channel , 2015 .

[7]  M. Holzbock,et al.  Aeronautical Multimedia Service Demonstration at K/KA Band , 1999 .

[8]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Part I: Methods, Measurements, and Models for Over-Water Settings , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[9]  Stephan Freytag An Introduction To Splines For Use In Computer Graphics And Geometric Modeling , 2016 .

[10]  M. Eube,et al.  Wideband time-variant air-to-ground radio channel measurements at 5 GHz , 2011, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[11]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Air–Ground Channel Characterization for Unmanned Aircraft Systems—Part III: The Suburban and Near-Urban Environments , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[12]  M.A. Jensen,et al.  Aeronautical telemetry using multiple-antenna transmitters , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[13]  Matthias Holzbock,et al.  An Aeronautical Multimedia Service Demonstration at High Frequencies , 1999, IEEE Multim..

[14]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Initial results for airframe shadowing in L- and C-band air-ground channels , 2015, 2015 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS).