The development of knowledge embeddedness in CASE technologies within organizations

Computer-aided software engineering (CASE) has become an important part of the information technology landscape and software development activities. While researchers have examined the productivity gains associated with CASE, relatively little attention has been accorded to one of the critical elements of CASE: the repository. The CASE repository is considered to be the cornerstone of CASE technology platforms. Therefore, any plan for CASE tool implementation must include a plan for building and managing the repository. Yet, significant challenges are encountered in efforts to fashion the CASE repository as an active source of relevant systems development knowledge in organizations. This study investigates the influence of factors that are believed to facilitate knowledge embeddedness within the CASE repository. Knowledge embeddedness refers to the extent to which relevant systems development knowledge in an organization has been codified and stored within the CASE repository. Data drawn from 176 firms employing CASE environments are used to investigate the relative influence of these factors. The results indicate that management support, methodology influence, time since adoption, and external knowledge links enable success in knowledge embeddedness.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Size and Innovation , 1992 .

[3]  Jahangir Karimi,et al.  A Framework for Comparing Information Engineering Methods , 1988, MIS Q..

[4]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[5]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Now the learning curve affects CASE tool adoption , 1992, IEEE Software.

[6]  R. Zmud.  An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[7]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[8]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[9]  K. Weick.  Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[10]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[11]  Carma McClure,et al.  Case is Software Automation , 1988 .

[12]  Mark N. Frolick,et al.  Computer-aided software engineering: The determinants of an effective implementation strategy , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Effects of Knowledge Embeddedness on the Diffusion of Case Technologies within Organizations , 1995, ICIS.

[15]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Dimensions of I/S Planning and Design Aids: A Functional Model of CASE Technology , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Joze Zupancic,et al.  Experiences and expectations with CASE technology - An example from Slovenia , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[17]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[18]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[19]  James Martin,et al.  Information Engineering, Book I: Introduction , 1989 .

[20]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[21]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[22]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[23]  Robert L. Dixon.  Winning with Case: Managing Modern Software Development , 1991 .

[24]  Greg Boone.  Establishing the Context of continuous Improvement for Technology Transfer , 1994, The Impact of Case Technology on Software Processes.

[25]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[26]  J. Pennings,et al.  Technological Networking and Innovation Implementation , 1992 .

[27]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[28]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[29]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[30]  Edward Yourdon.  Decline and Fall of the American Programmer , 1992 .

[31]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[32]  Ronald J. Norman,et al.  A self-assessment by the software engineering community , 1992, CACM.

[33]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Evaluation of vendor products: CASE tools as methodology companions , 1992, CACM.

[34]  John A. Stone.  Inside ADW and IEF: the promise and reality of CASE , 1993 .