Uranus and Neptune missions: A study in advance of the next Planetary Science Decadal Survey

Abstract The ice giant planets, Uranus and Neptune, represent an important and relatively unexplored class of planet. Most of our detailed information about them comes from fleeting looks by the Voyager 2 spacecraft in the 1980s. Voyager, and ground-based work since then, found that these planets, their satellites, rings, and magnetospheres, challenge our understanding of the formation and evolution of planetary systems. We also now know that Uranus-Neptune size planets are common around other stars. These are some of the reasons ice giant exploration was a high priority in NASA's most recent Planetary Science Decadal Survey. In preparation for the next Decadal Survey, NASA, with ESA participation, conducted a broad study of possible ice giant missions in the 2024–2037 timeframe. This paper summarizes the key results of the study, and addresses questions that have been raised by the science community and in a recent NASA review. Foremost amongst these are questions about the science objectives, the science payload, and the importance of an atmospheric probe. The conclusions of the NASA/ESA study remain valid. In particular, it is a high priority to send an orbiter and atmospheric probe to at least one of the ice giants, with instrumentation to study all components of an ice giant system. Uranus and Neptune are found to be equally compelling as science targets. The two planets are not equivalent, however, and each system has things to teach us the other cannot. An additional mission study is needed to refine plans for future exploration of these worlds.

[1]  M. R. Haas,et al.  Time-series Analysis of Broadband Photometry of Neptune from K2 , 2017, 1702.02943.

[2]  D. Banfield,et al.  Planetary descent probes: polarization nephelometer and hydrogen ortho/para instruments , 2005, 2005 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[3]  P. Nicholson,et al.  KRONOSEISMOLOGY: USING DENSITY WAVES IN SATURN'S C RING TO PROBE THE PLANET'S INTERIOR , 2013, 1304.3735.

[4]  K. Tsiganis,et al.  Explaining why the uranian satellites have equatorial prograde orbits despite the large planetary obliquity , 2012, 1208.4685.

[5]  E. Chiang,et al.  BREEDING SUPER-EARTHS AND BIRTHING SUPER-PUFFS IN TRANSITIONAL DISKS , 2015, 1510.08855.

[6]  D. Turrini,et al.  Planetesimals and Satellitesimals: Formation of the Satellite Systems , 2009, 0906.0353.

[7]  M. Horányi,et al.  Dust Observations by the Radio and Plasma Wave Science Instrument During Cassini's Grand Finale , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[8]  Giuseppe Piccioni,et al.  The comparative exploration of the ice giant planets with twin spacecraft: Unveiling the history of our Solar System , 2014 .

[9]  T. Spilker,et al.  A Joint NASA/ESA Mission Concept for In Situ Probe Explorations of the Ice Giants , 2018 .

[10]  Sona Hosseini,et al.  The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds , 2018, Astrobiology.

[11]  P. Nicholson,et al.  More Kronoseismology with Saturn's rings , 2014, 1407.6702.

[12]  Nikku Madhusudhan,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Saturn, with Exoplanet Perspective , 2016, Saturn in the 21st Century.

[13]  Tristan Guillot THE INTERIORS OF GIANT PLANETS: Models and Outstanding Questions , 2001 .

[14]  Jonathan D. Cryer,et al.  Time Series Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  T. Encrenaz,et al.  Scientific rationale for Uranus and Neptune in situ explorations , 2017, Planetary and Space Science.

[16]  M. Marley,et al.  Cassini Ring Seismology as a Probe of Saturn’s Interior. I. Rigid Rotation , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[17]  T. Owen,et al.  Jupiter’s interior and deep atmosphere: The initial pole-to-pole passes with the Juno spacecraft , 2017, Science.

[18]  A. Coradini,et al.  From Gas to Satellitesimals: Disk Formation and Evolution , 2009, 0906.3435.

[19]  Patrick Gaulme,et al.  Detection of Jovian seismic waves: a new probe of its interior structure , 2011, 1106.3714.

[20]  S. Stern,et al.  Outer Solar System Exploration: A Compelling and Unified Dual Mission Decadal Strategy for Exploring Uranus, Neptune, Triton, Dwarf Planets, and Small KBOs and Centaurs , 2018, 1807.08769.

[21]  J. Fortney,et al.  New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data , 2012, 1207.2309.

[22]  P. Gaulme,et al.  Seismology of giant planets , 2014, 1411.1740.

[23]  R. Murray-Clay,et al.  The Formation of Uranus and Neptune: Fine-tuning in Core Accretion , 2017, 1708.00862.

[24]  G. Schubert,et al.  Planetary magnetic fields: Observations and models , 2011 .

[25]  J. Fuller Saturn ring seismology: Evidence for stable stratification in the deep interior of Saturn , 2014, 1406.3343.

[26]  R. H. Brown,et al.  Triton's Geyser-Like Plumes: Discovery and Basic Characterization , 1990, Science.

[27]  J. Fortney,et al.  Uranus evolution models with simple thermal boundary layers , 2016, 1605.00171.