Impact of outside option on managerial compensation contract and environmental strategies in polluting industries

Abstract To unveil how a manager’s outside option affects managerial compensation contracts and environmental strategies in polluting industries, this article studies an agency problem in which a risk-averse manager has private information about his ability and type-dependent outside option. A compensation contract is designed to incentivise the manager to truthfully report. Meanwhile, the firm makes an optimal choice between end-of-pipe strategy and pollution prevention strategy to maximise its profit. Based on the principal-agent theory, we establish a managerial compensation contract model and derive the optimal contract mechanism by solving its equivalent optimal control problem. The results indicate that without an outside option, the manager receives a constant bonus share rate and no information rent under the end-of-pipe strategy, whereas he obtains a downward distorted incentive and high information rent under the pollution prevention strategy. Considering outside options, the manager may receive information rent under the end-of-pipe strategy while receiving a pooling distorted incentive under the pollution prevention strategy. In a certain circumstance, the managers are pooled with the same bonus share rate and information rent. However, due to the interaction between the countervailing incentives, it is difficult to identify the change in total information rent and the pollution prevention strategy decision.

[1]  Glen Dowell,et al.  Difference in Degrees: CEO Characteristics and Firm Environmental Disclosure , 2014 .

[2]  Sílvia Gaia,et al.  Green or Greed? An Alternative Look at CEO Compensation and Corporate Environmental Commitment , 2017 .

[3]  A. Reisner,et al.  Impact of manager characteristics on corporate environmental behavior at heavy-polluting firms in Shaanxi, China , 2015 .

[4]  Jorge Rivera,et al.  Chief executive officers and voluntary environmental performance: Costa Rica's certification for sustainable tourism , 2005 .

[5]  Qintao Fan,et al.  Equilibrium earnings management and managerial compensation in a multiperiod agency setting , 2014 .

[6]  Nilanjana Dutt,et al.  The Judgment of Garbage: End-of-Pipe Treatment and Waste Reduction , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Erwei Xiang,et al.  Executives' excess compensation, legitimacy, and environmental information disclosure in Chinese heavily polluting companies: The moderating role of media pressure , 2018, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[8]  Yanping Li,et al.  Integrated assessment of process pollution prevention and end-of-pipe control in secondary lead smelting , 2017 .

[9]  Xavier Gabaix,et al.  Is CEO Pay Really Inefficient? A Survey of New Optimal Contracting Theories , 2009 .

[10]  Xinghao Yan,et al.  An analysis of contract form for supply chains with quality improvement , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[11]  Canice Prendergast The Provision of Incentives in Firms , 1999 .

[12]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Participation Constraints in Adverse Selection Models , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[13]  Tiaojun Xiao,et al.  Risk sharing and information revelation mechanism of a one-manufacturer and one-retailer supply chain facing an integrated competitor , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Yi Han,et al.  Supply chain coordination based on return contracts with a threshold ordering quantity , 2015, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[15]  Giovanni Maggi,et al.  On Countervailing Incentives , 1995 .

[16]  Sunil Dutta,et al.  Capital Budgeting and Managerial Compensation: Incentive and Retention Effects , 2003 .

[17]  Silvia Sonderegger,et al.  The role of the agent's outside options in principal-agent relationships , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  Kai Yang,et al.  Impacts of uncertain project duration and asymmetric risk sensitivity information in project management , 2016, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[19]  A. Goktan Impact of green management on CEO compensation: interplay of the agency theory and institutional theory perspectives , 2014 .

[20]  Juan Alberto Aragón-Correa,et al.  Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment , 2004 .

[21]  Su-Yol Lee,et al.  From end-of-pipe technology towards pollution preventive approach: the evolution of corporate environmentalism in Korea , 2005 .

[23]  Jianxiong Zhang,et al.  Coordinating a supply chain for deteriorating items with a revenue sharing and cooperative investment contract , 2015 .

[24]  R. Nayak,et al.  Sustainable development of eco-industrial parks in China: effects of managers' environmental awareness on the relationships between practice and performance , 2015 .

[25]  James J. Cordeiro,et al.  Does explicit contracting effectively link CEO compensation to environmental performance , 2008 .

[26]  H. Zou,et al.  Are Top Executives Rewarded for Environmental Performance? The Role of the Board of Directors in the Context of China , 2015 .

[27]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  Environmental Performance and Executive Compensation: An Integrated Agency-Institutional Perspective , 2009 .

[28]  Wansheng Tang,et al.  A Supplier Switching Model With the Competitive Reactions and Economies of Scale Effects , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[29]  Ying-Ju Chen Risk–incentives trade-off and outside options , 2013, OR Spectr..

[30]  A. Mol,et al.  Why small and medium chemical companies continue to pose severe environmental risks in rural China. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[31]  Liu Yang,et al.  Optimal pricing contracts and level of information asymmetry in a supply chain , 2018, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..