Reply to Szuwalski: Policies robust to uncertainty in causes of productivity changes are needed

Szuwalski (1) has greatly misinterpreted the principal message of our report (2). We did not claim you could reliably estimate regime shifts for individual stocks. Table 2 in our report (2) clearly shows that the chance of improper assignment of the hypothesis is very high, even when you have a long time-series of data in hand. At any point in time, managers will rarely know if observed changes in productivity are a result of regime changes, changes in biomass, or random.