Use of force and civil–military relations in Russia: an automated content analysis

Russia's intervention in the Georgian–South Ossetian conflict has highlighted the need to rigorously examine trends in the public debate over the use of force in Russia. Approaching this debate through the prism of civil–military relations, we take advantage of recent methodological advances in automated content analysis and generate a new dataset of 8000 public statements made by Russia's political and military leaders during the Putin period. The data show little evidence that military elites exert a restraining influence on Russian foreign and defence policy. Although more hesitant than their political counterparts to embrace an interventionist foreign policy agenda, Russian military elites are considerably more activist in considering the use of force as an instrument of foreign policy.

[1]  Jack Snyder The Ideology of the Offensive: Military Decision Making and the Disasters of 1914 , 1984 .

[2]  Todd S. Sechser,et al.  Are Soldiers Less War-Prone than Statesmen? , 2004 .

[3]  Robert Axelrod,et al.  The Soviet Press on Soviet Foreign Policy: A Usually Reliable Source , 1981 .

[4]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .

[5]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  W. Zimmerman The Russian People and Foreign Policy , 2002 .

[7]  G. V. Damme,et al.  The Soldier and the State: An Analysis of Samuel Huntington’s View on Military Obedience Toward Political Authority , 2002 .

[8]  W. Domke,et al.  War and the changing global system , 1988 .

[9]  Yiming Yang,et al.  A re-examination of text categorization methods , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[10]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[11]  W. Zimmerman,et al.  Words and Deeds in Soviet Foreign Policy: The Case of Soviet Military Expenditures , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[12]  J. Levy Declining Power and the Preventive Motivation for War , 1987, World Politics.

[13]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States and Social Revolutions , 1979 .

[14]  Andrew Scobell Show of Force: Chinese Soldiers, Statesmen, and the 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis , 2000 .

[15]  Howard E. Frost A Content Analysis of Recent Soviet Party-Military Relations , 1989 .

[16]  Keith T. Poole,et al.  Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting , 2005 .

[17]  O. Spaulding The History of Militarism. , 1938, American Journal of International Law.

[18]  C. Wallander Third-World Conflict in Soviet Military Thought: Does the “New Thinking” Grow Prematurely Grey? , 1989, World Politics.

[19]  Klaus Hechenbichler,et al.  Weighted k-Nearest-Neighbor Techniques and Ordinal Classification , 2004 .

[20]  Georg Simmel,et al.  The Persistence of Social Groups. II , 1898, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  N. Polsby Congress and the Presidency , 1971 .

[22]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[23]  Prisoners of War?: Nation-States in the Modern Era , 1990 .

[24]  W. Zimmerman Slavophiles and Westernizers Redux: Contemporary Russian Elite Perspectives , 2005 .

[25]  Georg Simmel,et al.  The Persistence of Social Groups , 1898, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Justin Grimmer A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts : Supplemental Appendix , 2009 .

[27]  T. Skocpol,et al.  States and social revolutions : a comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China , 1979 .

[28]  Steven Skiena,et al.  Large-Scale Sentiment Analysis for News and Blogs (system demonstration) , 2007, ICWSM.

[29]  Issue Salience and Foreign Policy Role Specialization in the Soviet Politburo of the 1970s , 1984 .

[30]  J. Azrael,et al.  U.S. and Russian Policymaking with Respect to the Use of Force , 1997 .

[31]  Jonathan Wilkenfeld,et al.  Conflict Behavior and Linkage Politics , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[32]  Dustin Hillard,et al.  Computer-Assisted Topic Classification for Mixed-Methods Social Science Research , 2008 .

[33]  W. Sheppard WAR and POLITICS , 1973, A history of Ireland in 100 words.

[34]  Laurence I. Radway,et al.  Book Review: The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations, Defence and Diplomacy: The Soldier and the Conduct of Foreign Relations , 1959 .

[35]  D. Herspring Russian Civil-Military Relations: Putin's Legacy , 2011 .

[36]  Brian L. Job,et al.  The President and the Political Use of Force , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[37]  Andrew Scobell Soldiers, statesmen, strategic culture and China's 1950 intervention in Korea , 1999 .

[38]  T. Colton Commissars, Commanders, and Civilian Authority: The Structure of Soviet Military Politics , 1979 .

[39]  M. F.,et al.  Bibliography , 1985, Experimental Gerontology.

[40]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs , 2010 .

[41]  Janet Fleetwood,et al.  Editor's Introduction , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[42]  Peter D. Feaver,et al.  Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force , 2003 .

[43]  R. Polikar,et al.  Ensemble based systems in decision making , 2006, IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine.

[44]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[45]  D. Herspring,et al.  Russian Civil-Military Relations , 1996 .

[46]  Christopher Gelpi,et al.  Democratic Diversions , 1997 .

[47]  Tonya L. Putnam,et al.  State Militarism and Its Legacies: Why Military Reform Has Failed in Russia , 2004, International Security.

[48]  George W. Breslauer Is there a generation gap in the Soviet political establishment?: Demand articulation by RSFSR provincial party first secretaries , 1984 .

[49]  Thomas G. Mahnken,et al.  Causes of War: Power and the Roots of Conflict , 2000 .

[50]  Burt L. Monroe,et al.  Fightin' Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict , 2008, Political Analysis.

[51]  Gary King,et al.  A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science , 2010 .

[52]  L. Holland Choosing Your Battles: American Civil–Military Relations and the Use of Force , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[53]  Kurt Dassel Civilians, Soldiers, and Strife: Domestic Sources of International Aggression , 1998, International Security.

[54]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press Releases , 2010, Political Analysis.

[55]  Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick? Veterans in the Political Elite and the American Use of Force , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[56]  R. Buckley Speak softly and carry a big stick , 2000 .

[57]  M. Freedman,et al.  The Functions of Social Conflict , 1959 .