ERP evidence on the interaction between information structure and emotional salience of words
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Ulrike Toepel,et al. Catching the news: Processing strategies in listening to dialogs as measured by ERPs , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.
[2] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: the role of inter- versus intrasentential predictions. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[3] T. Allison,et al. Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[4] A. Jacobs,et al. Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[5] Peter Hagoort,et al. Semantic illusion depends on information structure: ERP evidence , 2009, Brain Research.
[6] Margaret Bradley,et al. Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: words, phrases, and task effects. , 2006, Progress in brain research.
[7] Mark H. Davis. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .
[8] R. Dolan,et al. Distant influences of amygdala lesion on visual cortical activation during emotional face processing , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[9] J. Fodor,et al. Semantic focus and sentence comprehension , 1979, Cognition.
[10] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: Differential ERP effects , 2007, Cognition.
[11] H. Leuthold,et al. The on-line processing of socio-emotional information in prototypical scenarios: inferences from brain potentials. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[12] Marcel Bastiaansen,et al. The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: How focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[13] J. Kissler,et al. Emotion and attention in visual word processing—An ERP study , 2009, Biological Psychology.
[14] Joseph Dien,et al. The neurocognitive basis of reading single words as seen through early latency ERPs: A model of converging pathways , 2009, Biological Psychology.
[15] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[16] Sonja A. Kotz,et al. Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study , 2007, Brain Research.
[17] Stefan J. Kiebel,et al. Amygdala damage affects event‐related potentials for fearful faces at specific time windows , 2009, Human brain mapping.
[18] Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al. Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2007, Biological Psychology.
[19] Brigitte Rockstroh,et al. Processing of emotional adjectives: Evidence from startle EMG and ERPs. , 2006, Psychophysiology.
[20] Karl J. Friston,et al. A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[21] M. Bradley,et al. Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. , 1997 .
[22] W. Sommer,et al. Time course and task dependence of emotion effects in word processing , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[23] S. Caharel,et al. Sensitivity of N170 and late positive components to social categorization and emotional valence , 2008, Brain Research.
[24] A. Anderson,et al. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events , 2001, Nature.
[25] Anita Steube,et al. Information structure : theoretical and empirical aspects , 2004 .
[26] M. Corbetta,et al. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[27] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[28] Laura D’Antuono,et al. Impulsivity and semantic/emotional processing: An examination of the N400 wave , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[29] M. Halliday. NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .
[30] G. V. Simpson,et al. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.
[31] R. H. Baayen,et al. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .
[32] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective , 2007, Brain Research.
[33] R. Jackendoff. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .
[34] K. Rayner,et al. Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[35] Petra B. Schumacher,et al. Pitch accent type affects the N400 during referential processing , 2010, Neuroreport.
[36] Marcel Bastiaansen,et al. Information Structure Influences Depth of Syntactic Processing: Event-Related Potential Evidence for the Chomsky Illusion , 2012, PloS one.
[37] Maria Polinsky,et al. Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions , 2007, Brain and Language.
[38] A. N. Gusev,et al. Categorization of unilaterally presented emotional words: an ERP analysis. , 2000, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.
[39] Christopher K. Kovach,et al. Rapid Interactions between the Ventral Visual Stream and Emotion-Related Structures Rely on a Two-Pathway Architecture , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[40] Anne Lacheret,et al. On-line Processing of Pop-Out Words in Spoken French Dialogues , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[41] Peter Hagoort,et al. Event-related Potential Evidence on the Influence of Accentuation in Spoken Discourse Comprehension in Chinese , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[42] M. Ruz,et al. Category expectations: A differential modulation of the N170 potential for faces and words , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[43] Christoph M. Michel,et al. Electrical neuroimaging reveals early generator modulation to emotional words , 2004, NeuroImage.
[44] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[45] Gina R. Kuperberg,et al. Neurophysiological Correlates of Comprehending Emotional Meaning in Context , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[46] S Lehéricy,et al. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[47] Michael J. Spivey,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: Preface , 2012 .
[48] E. Stern,et al. Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[49] J. Russell. A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .
[50] Ramin Assadollahi,et al. Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies. , 2006, Progress in brain research.
[51] E. Bernat,et al. Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[52] Z. Harris,et al. Foundations of language , 1941 .
[53] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.
[54] Kai Alter,et al. Prosody in Dialogues and Single Sentences: How Prosody can influence Speech Perception , 2004 .
[55] C. Vázquez,et al. Will the glass be half full or half empty? Brain potentials and emotional expectations , 2011, Biological Psychology.
[56] Bruno Rossion,et al. Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.
[57] Werner Sommer,et al. Reading emotional words within sentences: the impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[58] M. A. Pozo,et al. Looking at emotional words is not the same as reading emotional words: Behavioral and neural correlates. , 2010, Psychophysiology.
[59] Manfred Herrmann,et al. Time course of implicit processing and explicit processing of emotional faces and emotional words , 2011, Biological Psychology.
[60] Francesca M. M. Citron. Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies , 2012, Brain and Language.
[61] Sara C. Sereno,et al. Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2009, Biological Psychology.
[62] Dinkar Sharma,et al. Neural correlates of intrusion of emotion words in a modified Stroop task. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[63] Line Burholt Kristensen,et al. The interface between language and attention: prosodic focus marking recruits a general attention network in spoken language comprehension. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[64] M. de Vega,et al. Discourse-based emotional consistency modulates early and middle components of event-related potentials. , 2010, Emotion.
[65] Colin M. Brown,et al. Electrophysiological Evidence for Early Contextual Influences during Spoken-Word Recognition: N200 Versus N400 Effects , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[66] C. Spielberger,et al. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .
[67] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Brain responses to focus-related prosodic mismatch in Japanese , 2004, Speech Prosody 2004.
[68] Bruce D. McCandliss,et al. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[69] P. Vuilleumier,et al. How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[70] Urs Maurer,et al. The face-specific N170 component is modulated by emotional facial expression , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.