Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration

Abstract Head tilt is a rotation of the head relative to gravity, as exemplified by head roll or pitch from the natural upright orientation. Tilt stimulates both the otolith organs, owing to shifts in gravitational orientation, and the semicircular canals in response to head rotation, which in turn drive a variety of behavioral and perceptual responses. Studies of tilt perception typically have not adequately isolated otolith and canal inputs or their dynamic contributions. True tilt cannot readily dissociate otolith from canal influences. Alternatively, centrifugation generates centripetal accelerations that simulate tilt, but still entails a rotatory (canal) stimulus during important periods of the stimulus profiles. We reevaluated the perception of head tilt in humans, but limited the stimulus to linear forces alone, thus isolating the influence of otolith inputs. This was accomplished by employing a centrifugation technique with a variable-radius spinning sled. This allowed us to accelerate the sled to a constant angular velocity (128°/s), with the subject centered, and then apply dynamic centripetal accelerations after all rotatory perceptions were extinguished. These stimuli were presented in the subjects’ naso-occipital axis by translating the subjects 50 cm eccentrically either forward or backward. Centripetal accelerations were thus induced (0.25 g), which combined with gravity to yield a dynamically shifting gravitoinertial force simulating pitch-tilt, but without actually rotating the head. A magnitude-estimation task was employed to characterize the dynamic perception of pitch-tilt. Tilt perception responded sluggishly to linear acceleration, typically reaching a peak after 10–30 s. Tilt perception also displayed an adaptation phenomenon. Adaptation was manifested as a per-stimulus decline in perceived tilt during prolonged stimulation and a reversal aftereffect upon return to zero acceleration (i.e., recentering the subject). We conclude that otolith inputs can produce tilt perception in the absence of canal stimulation, and that this perception is subject to an adaptation phenomenon and low-pass filtering of its otolith input.

[1]  H SCHOENE,et al.  ON THE ROLE OF GRAVITY IN HUMAN SPATIAL ORIENTATION. , 1964, Aerospace medicine.

[3]  R S Kennedy,et al.  The effect of water immersion on perception of the oculogravic illusion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects. , 1968, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  S Glasauer,et al.  Linear acceleration perception: frequency dependence of the hilltop illusion. , 1995, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[5]  G D Paige,et al.  Influence of Sensorimotor Context on the Linear Vestibulo‐Ocular Reflex a , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M J Correia,et al.  Elicitation of horizontal nystagmus by periodic linear acceleration. , 1966, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  G. Paige,et al.  Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. I. Basic characteristics. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  F. Guedry Psychophysics of Vestibular Sensation , 1974 .

[9]  F E GUEDRY,et al.  The perception of the vertical; adaptation effects in four planes. , 1949, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  F E Guedry,et al.  The effect of semicircular cana stimulation during tilting on the subsequent perception of the visual vertical. , 1970, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  C. Markham,et al.  Ocular counter-rolling as a test of otolith function. , 1989, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[13]  W Bles,et al.  Ocular rotation and perception of the horizontal under static tilt conditions in patients without labyrinthine function. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  I S Curthoys,et al.  Binocular counterrolling in humans during dynamic rotation. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  V. J. Wilson,et al.  Mammalian Vestibular Physiology , 1979, Springer US.

[16]  S Lechner-Steinleitner,et al.  The effect of preceding tilt on the perceived vertical. Hysteresis in perception of the vertical. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[17]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  PERCEPTION OF THE POSTURAL VERTICAL FOLLOWING PROLONGED BODILY TILT IN NORMALS AND SUBJECTS WITH LABYRINTHINE DEFECTS. , 1964, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[18]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Factors contributing to the delay in the perception of the oculogravic illusion. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[19]  L. Snyder,et al.  Effect of viewing distance and location of the axis of head rotation on the monkey's vestibuloocular reflex. I. Eye movement responses. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R D Yee,et al.  The dynamics of vertical eye movements in normal human subjects. , 1983, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[21]  D E Angelaki,et al.  Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. I. Linear acceleration responses during off-vertical axis rotation. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Clegg Wc,et al.  Nonvisual perception of the postural vertical. I. Sagittal plane. , 1954 .

[23]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Validity of the oculogravic illusion as a specific indicator of otolith function. , 1965 .

[24]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  L. Young,et al.  Model for vestibular adaptation to horizontal rotation. , 1969, Aerospace medicine.

[27]  W. Clegg Non-visual perception of the postural vertical. III. Diagonal planes. , 1954, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  C. W. Mann,et al.  The perception of the vertical: V. Adjustment to the postural vertical as a function of the magnitude of postural tilt and duration of exposure. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  R. Mayne,et al.  A Systems Concept of the Vestibular Organs , 1974 .