Turn-taking and the local management of conversation in a highly simultaneous computer-mediated communication system

Ongoing inquiry in communication technology research includes the questions of whether and how users adapt communication to the relatively restricted codes provided by text-based computer-mediated communication (CMC). This study proposes that adaptations may be affected by the level of simultaneity in messaging that CMC systems afford users. This suggestion is examined through an analysis of the particular conversational management strategies afforded by a fully synchronous computermediated communication system in which message transmission is keystroke-bykeystroke. Conversation analyses performed on the transcript of a three-person online conversation suggest several conclusions: Despite the novelty of the system, the CMC users appropriated and adapted many techniques from face-to-face conversations for the local management of conversations, including turn taking, turn allocation, and explicit interruption management. At the time, turn exchange was accomplished by the use of overlapping intermittent talk followed by lengthy strategic pauses, rather than according to the “no gap, no overlap” ideal of spoken conversation. Overall, the computer-mediated exchanges appeared resilient to modality change, and users spontaneously and creatively employed both traditional and technical features of conversation management.

[1]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[2]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[3]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[4]  Jerry R. Hobbs Interactive Discourse: Influence of the Social Context , 1980, ACL.

[5]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[6]  G. Salton,et al.  The network nation , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[8]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[9]  Margaret McLaughlin,et al.  Conversation: How Talk Is Organized , 1984 .

[10]  Dixie Goswami,et al.  Writing in Non-Academic Settings. , 1981 .

[11]  C. Steinfield Computer-Mediated Communication in an Organizational Setting: Explaining Task-Related and Socioemotional Uses , 1986 .

[12]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[13]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[14]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[15]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[16]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[17]  H. L. Capron,et al.  Computers: Tools for an Information Age , 1987 .

[18]  Gene H. Lerner Notes on overlap management in conversation: The case of delayed completion , 1989 .

[19]  H. L. Capron Computers: tools for an information age (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[20]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[21]  R. Daft,et al.  Understanding Managers' Media Choices: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 1990 .

[22]  Davis Albert Foulger,et al.  Medium as process: the structure, use, and practice of computer conferencing on ibm's ibmpc computer conferencing facility. (volumes i and ii) , 1990 .

[23]  A. Newell,et al.  A Study of Conversational Turn-Taking in a Communication Aid for the Deaf , 1991 .

[24]  J. Arnott,et al.  A Study of Conversational Turn-taking in a Communication Aid for the Disabled , 1991 .

[25]  J. Valacich,et al.  Group Size and Anonymity Effects on Computer-Mediated Idea Generation , 1992 .

[26]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[27]  John L. Arnott,et al.  A Study of Turn-taking in a Computer-Supported Group Task , 1993 .

[28]  J. McGrath,et al.  Group Task Performance and Communication Technology , 1993 .

[29]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[30]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  Identifying and analyzing multiple threads in computer-mediated and face-to-face conversations , 1996, CSCW '96.

[31]  Angela Cora Garcia,et al.  The Eyes of the Beholder: Understanding the Turn-Taking System in Quasi-Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication , 1999 .

[32]  Lynn Cherny Conversation and Community: Chat in a Virtual World , 1999 .

[33]  Susan C. Herring Interactional Coherence in CMC , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Sherri L. Condon,et al.  Profiling turns in interaction: discourse structure and function , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Computer-mediated communication on the internet , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Herbert H. Clark Conversation, Structure of , 2006 .

[37]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Validation and Application of Electronic Propinquity Theory to Computer-Mediated Communication in Groups , 2008, Commun. Res..