Age distribution of dengue cases in southern Vietnam from 2000 to 2015

Background Dengue is the most common vector-borne viral infection. In recent times, an increase in the age of cases with clinical dengue has been reported in the national surveillance system and published literature of Vietnam. This change not only alter the risk of transmission and disease burden in different populations but also will impact for prevention and control strategies. A retrospective study was conducted from 2000 to 2015 in 19 provinces of southern Vietnam to describe the changes in age distribution of dengue cases and circulating serotypes. Methodology/Principal findings The study is a time trend analysis of the data aggregated from the database of dengue surveillance system. The database consisted of clinically diagnosed and laboratory-confirmed cases of dengue in southern Vietnam from 2000 to 2015. In the study period, the mean age of dengue cases increased from 12.2 ± 8.8 years old (y/o) to 16.8 ± 13.3 y/o between 2000 and 2015. Majority of severe cases were observed in the age group of 5–9 y/o and 10–14 y/o. Overall, the mortality and case fatality rates (CFR) were lowest during 2010 to 2015, and all four serotypes of dengue were observed. Conclusions/Significance With the exception of severe form, the age distribution of clinical cases of dengue appears to be shifting towards older age groups. An increase in the mean age of clinical cases of dengue has been observed in southern Vietnam over the past decade, and the highest incidence was observed in age group of 5–14 y/o. All serotypes of dengue were in circulation.

[1]  N. van Kinh,et al.  Epidemiological and Clinical Features of Dengue Infection in Adults in the 2017 Outbreak in Vietnam , 2019, BioMed research international.

[2]  I. Dorigatti,et al.  Cross-serotype interactions and disease outcome prediction of dengue infections in Vietnam , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[3]  K. Koelle,et al.  Transmission-clearance trade-offs indicate that dengue virulence evolution depends on epidemiological context , 2018, Nature Communications.

[4]  Simon I Hay,et al.  The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. , 2016, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[5]  Eva Harris,et al.  Dengue , 2015, The Lancet.

[6]  A. Hoes,et al.  The changing incidence of Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever in Indonesia: a 45-year registry-based analysis , 2014, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[7]  John S. Brownstein,et al.  The global distribution and burden of dengue , 2013, Nature.

[8]  Edward C. Holmes,et al.  Endemic Dengue Associated with the Co-Circulation of Multiple Viral Lineages and Localized Density-Dependent Transmission , 2011, PLoS pathogens.

[9]  R. Souza-Santos,et al.  Change in Age Pattern of Persons with Dengue, Northeastern Brazil , 2011, Emerging infectious diseases.

[10]  R. Rico-Hesse,et al.  Dengue Virus Virulence and Transmission Determinants , 2009, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[11]  Aidan McDermott,et al.  The Impact of the Demographic Transition on Dengue in Thailand: Insights from a Statistical Analysis and Mathematical Modeling , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[12]  Mauricio L. Barreto,et al.  Recent Shift in Age Pattern of Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever, Brazil , 2008, Emerging infectious diseases.

[13]  Lee Ching Ng,et al.  The 2005 dengue epidemic in Singapore: epidemiology, prevention and control. , 2008, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[14]  A. Failloux,et al.  Aedes aegypti in south Vietnam: ecology, genetic structure, vectorial competence and resistance to insecticides. , 2003, The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health.

[15]  D. Ha,et al.  Predictive Indicators for Forecasting Epidemic of Dengue/Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever Through Epidemiological, Virological and Entomological Surveillance , 2002 .

[16]  M. Guzmán,et al.  Dengue: an update. , 2002, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[17]  D. Ha,et al.  Dengue epidemic in southern Vietnam, 1998. , 2000, Emerging infectious diseases.