Quantitative probabilistic modeling of environmental control and life support System resilience for long-duration human spaceflight

The future of human space exploration will see crews travel farther and remain in space for longer durations than ever before. For the first time in the history of human spaceflight, the Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) that sustain the crew in their habitat will have to function without rapid resupply or abort-to-Earth capability in the event of an emergency. In this environment, reliability and resilience will become more dominant design drivers, and will need to be considered alongside traditional system metrics such as mass and cost early in the design process in order to select the optimal ECLSS design for a given mission. This thesis presents the use of semi-Markov process (SMP) models to quantify the resilience of long-duration ECLSS. An algorithm is defined to translate ECLSS design data including system architecture, buffer sizes, and component reliability information into an SMP and then use that SMP to calculate resilience metrics such as the probability of system failure before the end of mission and the number of spares for each component that are required to achieve a certain probability of success. This methodology is demonstrated on a notional ECLSS, and then used to determine logistics requirements for a Mars One surface habitat Life Support Unit and examine the trade between resupply mass and the probability that sufficient spares are supplied. This case study found that, if sparing is performed at the processor level, 10,410 kg of spares would have to be provided in each resupply mission in order to provide a probability greater than 0.999 that sufficient spares are available to complete all required repairs. This is equivalent to over 75% of the mass of consumables that would be required to sustain an open loop system for the same duration. When coupled with the increased uncertainty associated with regenerative systems, the low mass savings associated with the selection of regenerative rather than open loop indicate that, at current reliability levels and with spares implemented at the processor level, regenerative ECLSS may not be the optimal design choice for a given mission. The SMP methodology described in this thesis provides an analytical means to quantify

[1]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[2]  William Cirillo,et al.  Supportability for Beyond Low Earth Orbit Missions , 2011 .

[3]  Min Xie,et al.  Reliability analysis using an additive Weibull model with bathtub-shaped failure rate function , 1996 .

[4]  I. Y. Kim,et al.  Adaptive weighted-sum method for bi-objective optimization: Pareto front generation , 2005 .

[5]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Introduction to Probability , 2002 .

[6]  Michael K. Ewert,et al.  Advanced Life Support--Baseline Values and Assumptions Document , 2005 .

[7]  Harry Jones,et al.  Life Support for Deep Space and Mars , 2014 .

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[9]  Harry W. Jones Design and Analysis of a Flexible, Reliable Deep Space Life Support System , 2012 .

[10]  Jacques Janssen,et al.  Processus semi-markoviens bivariés. Applications à la théorie du risque , 1978 .

[11]  R. Pyke Markov Renewal Processes with Finitely Many States , 1961 .

[12]  Irem Y. Tumer,et al.  The function-failure design method , 2005 .

[13]  R. Pyke Markov renewal processes: Definitions and preliminary properties , 1961 .

[14]  Andrew Owens,et al.  An Independent Assessment of the Technical Feasibility of the Mars One Mission Plan , 2014 .

[15]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World , 2011 .

[16]  Charles E Ebeling,et al.  An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering , 1996 .

[17]  Walter L. Smith,et al.  Regenerative stochastic processes , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  William David Compton Where No Man Has Gone Before: A History of Apollo Lunar Exploration Missions , 1989 .

[19]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Prediction of Reliability for Environmental Control and Life Support Systems , 2011 .

[20]  Harry Jones,et al.  Ultra Reliable Closed Loop Life Support for Long Space Missions , 2010 .

[21]  Michel D. Ingham,et al.  Fault Management at JPL: Past, Present and Future , 2011 .

[22]  Ward Whitt,et al.  Numerical Inversion of Laplace Transforms of Probability Distributions , 1995, INFORMS J. Comput..

[23]  Alessandro Birolini Reliability Engineering: Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[24]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Normal-Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating the Pareto Surface in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[25]  Carol Norberg,et al.  History of human spaceflight , 2013 .

[26]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Hazard Analysis of Complex Spacecraft Using Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis , 2014 .

[27]  Julie Wertz Expected productivity-based risk analysis in conceptual design : with application to the Terrestrial Planet Finder Interferometer mission , 2005 .

[28]  Peter C. Kiessler,et al.  A critical look at the bathtub curve , 2003, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[29]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Use of Genetic Algorithms and Transient Models for Life-Support Systems Analysis , 2006 .

[30]  Dov Dori,et al.  Object-process methodology - a holistic systems paradigm , 2013 .

[31]  David Clark,et al.  Model-driven development of reliable avionics architectures for Lunar Surface Systems , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[32]  Andrew Owens,et al.  Multidisciplinary Hybrid Surface Habitat Tradespace Exploration and Optimization , 2014 .

[33]  Diane L. Linne,et al.  NASA Technology Area 07: Human Exploration Destination Systems Roadmap , 2011 .

[34]  P. O. Wieland,et al.  Living Together in Space: The Design and Operation of the Life Support Systems on the International Space Station , 1998 .

[35]  Rüdiger Wirth,et al.  Knowledge-based support of system analysis for the analysis of Failure modes and effects , 1996 .

[36]  Paul Wieland Designing For Human Presence in Space: An Introduction to Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS) , 2005 .

[37]  Walter R Nunn,et al.  Semi-Markov Processes: An Introduction, , 1977 .

[38]  David H. Collins,et al.  An Introduction to Solving for Quantities of Interest in Finite-State Semi-Markov Processes , 2012 .

[39]  Harry Jones Life Support Dependability for Distant Space Missions , 2010 .

[40]  Harry W. Jones,et al.  Advanced Life Support Equivalent System Mass Guidelines Document , 2013 .

[41]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Engineering Resilient Space Systems , 2015 .

[42]  M. B. Kline Suitability of the lognormal distribution for corrective maintenance repair times , 1984 .

[43]  Thomas W DeLong,et al.  A Fault Tree Manual , 1970 .

[44]  Sean Kenny,et al.  Reliability and Productivity Modeling for the Optimization of Separated Spacecraft Interferometers , 2013 .

[45]  Sung-Hoon Ahn,et al.  Practical aspects of a condition monitoring system for a wind turbine with emphasis on its design, system architecture, testing and installation , 2010 .

[46]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Design of Long-Endurance Systems With Inherent Robustness to Partial Failures During Operations , 2012 .

[47]  Jeremy S. Agte,et al.  Multistate analysis and design : case studies in aerospace design and long endurance systems , 2011 .