Cotton responses to simulated insect damage: Radiation-use efficiency, canopy architecture and leaf nitrogen content as affected by loss of reproductive organs

Abstract Key cotton pests feed preferentially on reproductive organs which are normally shed after injury. Loss of reproductive organs in cotton may decrease the rate of leaf nitrogen depletion associated with fruit growth and increase nitrogen uptake and reduction by extending the period of root and leaf growth compared with undamaged plants. Higher levels of leaf nitrogen resulting from more assimilation and less depletion could increase the photosynthetic capacity of damaged crops in relation to undamaged controls. To test this hypothesis, radiation-use efficiency (RUE = g dry matter per MJ of photosynthetically active radiation intercepted by the canopy) of crops in which flowerbuds and young fruits were manually removed was compared with that of undamaged controls. Removal of fruiting structures did not affect RUE when cotton was grown at low nitrogen supply and high plant density. In contrast, under high nitrogen supply and low plant density, fruit removal increased seasonal RUE by 20–27% compared to controls. Whole canopy measurements, however, failed to detect the expected variations in foliar nitrogen due to damage. Differences in RUE between damaged and undamaged canopies were in part associated with changes in plant and canopy structure (viz. internode number and length, canopy height, branch angle) that modified light distribution within the canopy. These structural responses and their influence on canopy light penetration and photosynthesis are synthetised in coefficients of light extinction ( k ) that were 10 to 30% smaller in damaged crops than in controls and in a positive correlation between RUE −1 and k for crops grown under favourable conditions (i.e. high nitrogen, low density). Changes in plant structure and their effects on canopy architecture and RUE should be considered in the analysis of cotton growth after damage by insects that induce abscission of reproductive organs.

[1]  P. Staswick.  Storage Proteins of Vegetative Plant Tissues , 1994 .

[2]  S. Wullschleger,et al.  Canopy development and photosynthesis of cotton as influenced by nitrogen nutrition , 1990 .

[3]  V. Sadras.  Compensatory growth in cotton after loss of reproductive organs , 1995 .

[4]  R. Karban,et al.  Induced Plant Responses to Herbivory , 1989 .

[5]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[6]  J. Hanan,et al.  Module and metamer dynamics and virtual plants , 1994 .

[7]  Glyn M. Rimmington,et al.  Modelling plant growth and development , 1986 .

[8]  A. Hearn,et al.  Response of Cotton to Damage by Insect Pests in Australia: Compensation for Early Season Fruit Damage , 1992 .

[9]  A. Marani,et al.  Penetration of Radiation into Cotton Crop Canopies1 , 1985 .

[10]  S. Peng,et al.  Single Leaf and Canopy Photosynthesis Response to Plant Age in Cotton , 1991 .

[11]  I. Rochester,et al.  Cycling of fertilizer and cotton crop residue nitrogen , 1993 .

[12]  H. Rawson,et al.  Effect of Leaf Position, Expansion and Age on Photosynthesis, Transpiration and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton , 1980 .

[13]  Bruce A. Kimball,et al.  COTCO2: a cotton growth simulation model for global change , 1994 .

[14]  J. L. Monteith,et al.  Validity of the correlation between intercepted radiation and biomass , 1994 .

[15]  S. Milroy,et al.  A model to simulate the development, growth and yield of irrigated sunflower , 1993 .

[16]  J. Trumble,et al.  Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory , 1993 .

[17]  G. Constable.  Growth and light receipt by mainstem cotton leaves in relation to plant density in the field , 1986 .

[18]  Takeshi Horie,et al.  Leaf Nitrogen, Photosynthesis, and Crop Radiation Use Efficiency: A Review , 1989 .

[19]  J. Rosenthal,et al.  Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  V. Sadras,et al.  Ontogenetic changes in radiation use efficiency of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) crops , 1992 .

[21]  Karl J Niklas,et al.  THE ROLE OF PHYLLOTACTIC PATTERN AS A “DEVELOPMENTAL CONSTRAINT” ON THE INTERCEPTION OF LIGHT BY LEAF SURFACES , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  A. Hearn,et al.  Cotton cropping systems , 1992 .

[23]  J. Dale.  Some Effects of the Continuous Removal of Floral Buds on the Growth of the Cotton Plant , 1959 .

[24]  F. Crowther.  Studies in Growth Analysis of the Cotton Plant under Irrigation in the Sudan , 1934 .

[25]  D. Charles-Edwards,et al.  Light interception by grain legume row crops , 1984 .

[26]  C. J. Pearson,et al.  Field crop ecosystems. , 1992 .

[27]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Leaf orientation of a cotton plant , 1973 .

[28]  D. J. Finney.  Was This in Your Statistics Textbook? VI. Regression and Covariance , 1989, Experimental Agriculture.