Image-guided surgical navigation for removal of foreign bodies in the deep maxillofacial region.

PURPOSE Most trauma surgeons encounter numerous penetrating injuries. Some foreign bodies can cause pain, infection, and discomfort to the patient. Serious functional disorders also are likely to occur. Foreign bodies in critical areas must be removed. This report describes the use of image-guided technology for the removal of foreign bodies deep in the maxillofacial region. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2008 through 2011, 5 patients with foreign bodies in the maxillofacial area underwent image-guided removal at the authors' department. The STN navigation system (Stryker-Leibinger, Freiburg, Germany) was used for surgical planning and intraoperative navigation. Preoperatively, computerized tomography and digital subtraction angiography were used to create 3-dimensional views of the region to aid surgeons in more accurately defining the spatial location of the foreign object. During surgery, the foreign objects and surgical instruments were visualized on the screen. RESULTS In all 5 cases, the foreign bodies were removed by minimally invasive access without any complications. Surgical time was approximately 40% shorter compared with the conventional technique of not using image-guided navigation. A 1-year postoperative evaluation showed that the patients' complaints and symptoms had resolved, function was restored, and esthetics were remarkably improved. CONCLUSION Navigation-guided removal of foreign bodies in the complex, deep maxillofacial region in proximity to vital areas can be regarded an ideal and valuable option for these potentially complicated procedures.

[1]  S. Graham,et al.  The Transcaruncular Approach to the Medial Orbital Wall , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  P. Pohlenz,et al.  Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in the treatment of gunshot wounds of the viscerocranium , 2011, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[3]  H. Kärcher,et al.  Removal of a pellet from the left orbital cavity by image-guided endoscopic navigation. , 2007, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[4]  G. Sundar,et al.  Computer-Assisted Navigational Surgery Improves Outcomes in Orbital Reconstructive Surgery , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[5]  D. Burke,et al.  Things that go beep: experience with an ED guideline for use of a handheld metal detector in the management of ingested non-hazardous metallic foreign bodies , 2006, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[6]  J. Olver,et al.  Image Guidance Removal of a Foreign Body in the Orbital Apex , 2009, Orbit.

[7]  J. Ellis,et al.  Endoscopic transnasal removal of orbital foreign body , 1999, Eye.

[8]  J. Pyhtinen,et al.  Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study. , 1993, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[9]  D. He,et al.  Navigation-Guided Resection for a Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Involving the Temporomandibular Joint and Skull Base , 2012, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[10]  R. Goldberg,et al.  The Transconjunctival Approach to the Orbital Floor and Orbital Fat A Prospective Study , 1990, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[11]  Yanping Lin,et al.  Navigation-guided correction of midfacial post-traumatic deformities (Shanghai experience with 40 cases). , 2012, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.