Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilities

In society today, people experiencing disability can face discrimination. As artificial intelligence solutions take on increasingly important roles in decision-making and interaction, they have the potential to impact fair treatment of people with disabilities in society both positively and negatively. We describe some of the opportunities and risks across four emerging AI application areas: employment, education, public safety, and healthcare, identified in a workshop with participants experiencing a range of disabilities. In many existing situations, non-AI solutions are already discriminatory, and introducing AI runs the risk of simply perpetuating and replicating these flaws. We next discuss strategies for supporting fairness in the context of disability throughout the AI development lifecycle. AI systems should be reviewed for potential impact on the user in their broader context of use. They should offer opportunities to redress errors, and for users and those impacted to raise fairness concerns. People with disabilities should be included when sourcing data to build models, and in testing, to create a more inclusive and robust system. Finally, we offer pointers into an established body of literature on human-centered design processes and philosophies that may assist AI and ML engineers in innovating algorithms that reduce harm and ultimately enhance the lives of people with disabilities.

[1]  Anupam Chander The Racist Algorithm , 2016 .

[2]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Design for user empowerment , 2015, Interactions.

[3]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  Toward fairness in AI for people with disabilities SBG@a research roadmap , 2019, ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput..

[4]  Jutta Treviranus,et al.  Designing interaction, voice, and inclusion in AAC research , 2017, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[5]  Danielle Wilde,et al.  University of Southern Denmark Exploring aesthetic enhancement of wearable technologies for deaf women , 2018 .

[6]  Susan Wyche,et al.  Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery , 2009, CHI.

[7]  Cristiano Storni,et al.  Multiple Forms of Appropriation in Self-Monitoring Technology: Reflections on the Role of Evaluation in Future Self-Care , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Laurianne Sitbon,et al.  Co-designing interactive applications with adults with intellectual disability: a case study , 2017, OZCHI.

[9]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[10]  Newton M. Campos The Lean Startup: How today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses , 2014 .

[11]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Ability-based design , 2018, Commun. ACM.

[12]  Julius Adebayo,et al.  CREDIT SCORING IN THE ERA OF BIG DATA , 2017 .

[13]  N. Glickman Do you hear voices? Problems in assessment of mental status in deaf persons with severe language deprivation. , 2007, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[14]  B. Fadeel,et al.  A journey of hope: lessons learned from studies on rare diseases and orphan drugs , 2006, Journal of internal medicine.

[15]  Leah Findlater,et al.  "Accessibility Came by Accident": Use of Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants by People with Disabilities , 2018, CHI.

[16]  Jutta Treviranus,et al.  Life-long learning on the inclusive web , 2016, W4A.

[17]  David Geerts,et al.  The Tactics of Everyday Practice: A Semiotic Approach to Appropriation , 2016, IxD&A.

[18]  Peter Graf,et al.  Insights from the aphasia project: designing technology for and with people who have aphasia , 2002 .

[19]  Myriam Lewkowicz,et al.  Engaging with Users and Stakeholders: The Emotional and the Personal , 2016, GROUP.

[20]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes , 2017, Philosophy & Technology.

[21]  Irene Rogan Shaffer,et al.  Exploring the Performance of Facial Expression Recognition Technologies on Deaf Adults and Their Children , 2018, ASSETS.

[22]  Colin B. D. Clark Many more stories: Co-design and creative communities , 2018 .

[24]  S. Burgstahler Opening Doors or Slamming Them Shut? Online Learning Practices and Students with Disabilities , 2015 .

[25]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Does Technology Have Race? , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Values, Identity, and Social Translucence: Neurodiverse Student Teams in Higher Education , 2018, CHI.

[27]  Kristine Holbø,et al.  Safe walking technology for people with dementia: what do they want? , 2013, ASSETS.

[28]  Mark Ryan,et al.  Implementing an ethical approach to big data analytics in assistive robotics for elderly with dementia , 2016, CSOC.

[29]  Rachel K. E. Bellamy,et al.  AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Bias , 2018, ArXiv.

[30]  G. Krahn,et al.  A cascade of disparities: health and health care access for people with intellectual disabilities. , 2006, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[31]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples , 2011, TACC.

[32]  M. Fox,et al.  Health disparities of adults with intellectual disabilities: what do we know? What do we do? , 2014, Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID.

[33]  Ansgar Koene,et al.  IEEE P7003™ standard for algorithmic bias considerations: work in progress paper , 2018 .

[34]  Ben Hutchinson,et al.  Fairness-Aware Machine Learning: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned , 2019, WSDM.

[35]  Robin Brewer,et al.  Understanding the Power of Control in Autonomous Vehicles for People with Vision Impairment , 2018, ASSETS.

[36]  Matthew A. Bruckner,et al.  The Promise and Perils of Algorithmic Lenders' Use of Big Data , 2018 .

[37]  Deborah Klein Walker,et al.  Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[38]  C. Dudley-Marling,et al.  Two Perspectives on Inclusion in the United States. , 2014 .

[39]  Pascal Guitton,et al.  Online e-learning and cognitive disabilities: A systematic review , 2019, Comput. Educ..

[40]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Public policy and the global public inclusive infrastructure project , 2013, INTR.

[41]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems , 2019, FAT.

[42]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[43]  Alan Borning,et al.  Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.

[44]  Rebecca Fiebrink,et al.  Using Interactive Machine Learning to Support Interface Development Through Workshops with Disabled People , 2015, CHI.

[45]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Reframing Assistive Robots to Promote Successful Aging , 2018, ACM Trans. Hum. Robot Interact..

[46]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory Design: The Third Space in Human– Computer Interaction , 2012 .

[47]  Shari Trewin,et al.  AI Fairness for People with Disabilities: Point of View , 2018, ArXiv.

[48]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design: the third space in HCI , 2002 .

[49]  Pollard,et al.  Public mental health service and diagnostic trends regarding individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing. , 1994 .

[50]  Gaurav Parmar,et al.  Affordable Smart Wheelchair , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[51]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Potentials of the "Unexpected": Technology Appropriation Practices and Communication Needs , 2014, GROUP.

[52]  Yotam Shmargad,et al.  How Algorithms Discriminate Based on Data They Lack: Challenges, Solutions, and Policy Implications , 2018, Journal of Information Policy.

[53]  L. Iezzoni,et al.  Eliminating health and health care disparities among the growing population of people with disabilities. , 2011, Health affairs.

[54]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Broadening accessibility through special interests: a new approach for software customization , 2010, ASSETS '10.

[55]  Os Keyes,et al.  The Misgendering Machines , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[56]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[57]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Incorporating Social Factors in Accessible Design , 2018, ASSETS.

[58]  Ben Hutchinson,et al.  Fairness-Aware Machine Learning: Practical Challenges and Lessons Learned , 2019, WWW.

[59]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  (In)Visibility in Disability and Assistive Technology , 2017, ACM Trans. Access. Comput..

[60]  A. Rotatori,et al.  Making Inclusion Work in General Education Classrooms , 2012 .

[61]  Eric Ries The lean startup : how today's entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses , 2011 .

[62]  Chengqi Zhang,et al.  Data preparation for data mining , 2003, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[63]  Kush R. Varshney,et al.  Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairness , 2018, ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[64]  Charles A. Scherbaum,et al.  The Assessment of Attitudes Toward Individuals With Disabilities in the Workplace , 2003, The Journal of psychology.

[65]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  Designing technology for and with developmentally diverse children: a systematic literature review , 2015, IDC.

[66]  Morgan Klaus Scheuerman,et al.  "Is Someone There? Do They Have a Gun": How Visual Information about Others Can Improve Personal Safety Management for Blind Individuals , 2017, ASSETS.

[67]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities , 2007, UIST.

[68]  Jo Herstad,et al.  Three tensions in participatory design for inclusion , 2013, CHI.

[69]  Meera Adya,et al.  The Disability Employment Puzzle: A Field Experiment on Employer Hiring Behavior , 2015 .

[70]  Jutta Treviranus The Value of Being Different , 2019, W4A.

[71]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[72]  Morgan Klaus Scheuerman,et al.  Gender Recognition or Gender Reductionism?: The Social Implications of Embedded Gender Recognition Systems , 2018, CHI.

[73]  S. Bruyere,et al.  Perspectives on Disability Disclosure: The Importance of Employer Practices and Workplace Climate , 2014 .

[74]  Gregory John Downey,et al.  Closed Captioning: Subtitling, Stenography, and the Digital Convergence of Text with Television , 2008 .

[75]  EunJeong Cheon,et al.  Integrating roboticist values into a Value Sensitive Design framework for humanoid robots , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[76]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Collaborative Appropriation: How Couples, Teams, Groups and Communities Adapt and Adopt Technologies , 2016, CSCW Companion.

[77]  Sushil K. Oswal Participatory design: barriers and possibilities , 2014, CDQR.