Smooth movers: perceptually guided human motion simulation

To animate a character, a number of poses are displayed in quick succession in order to create the illusion of motion. For most real-time applications, such as games, the pose update rate is largely constrained by the available hardware and overall simulation complexity. To date, no analysis of the factors that affect the perceived smoothness of animated virtual characters has been presented. In the first perceptual studies aimed at identifying such factors and their interactions, we have determined some thresholds that could be used to produce acceptably smooth human animations in a variety of conditions. Some interesting results were found, e.g., that character type, clothing, scene complexity or motion synchronicity had no effect on smoothness perception in our experiments, but cycle rate, linear velocity, motion complexity and group size all had a significant effect, with slower or lower intensity movements generally requiring fewer updates. Our results should be of real practical use to character animators in various application areas, but in particular to developers of real-time applications where Simulation Levels Of Detail (SLOD) need to be employed.

[1]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Synthesizing physically realistic human motion in low-dimensional, behavior-specific spaces , 2004, ACM Trans. Graph..

[2]  W. Dittrich Action Categories and the Perception of Biological Motion , 1993, Perception.

[3]  C. Landis Determinants of the critical flicker-fusion threshold. , 1954, Physiological reviews.

[4]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[5]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Simulation Levels of Detail for Real-time Animation , 1997, Graphics Interface.

[6]  Bobby Bodenheimer,et al.  Computing the duration of motion transitions: an empirical approach , 2004, SCA '04.

[7]  Okan Arikan Compression of motion capture databases , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[8]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Perception of Human Motion With Different Geometric Models , 1998, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[10]  Nancy S. Pollard,et al.  Perceptual metrics for character animation: sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[11]  B. E. Rogowitz The human visual system: a guide for the display technologist , 1983 .

[12]  Markus Oesker,et al.  Psychological Evidence for Unconscious Processing of Detail in Real‐time Animation of Multiple Characters , 2000 .

[13]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Psychological Evidence for Unconscious Processing of Detail in Real-time Animation of Multiple Characters , 2000, Comput. Animat. Virtual Worlds.

[14]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/cav.147 , 2022 .

[15]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Window of visibility: a psychophysical theory of fidelity in time-sampled visual motion displays , 1986 .

[16]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of LOD clothing for virtual humans , 2006, SCA '06.

[17]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Obscuring length changes during animated motion , 2004, ACM Trans. Graph..

[18]  Jean-Paul Laumond,et al.  Real-time navigating crowds: scalable simulation and rendering: Research Articles , 2006 .

[19]  Carol O'Sullivan,et al.  Geopostors: a real-time geometry/impostor crowd rendering system , 2005, SIGGRAPH 2005.