Proposal of the “Total Error Minimization Method” for robust design

Abstract We propose a new approach for the robust design of a product with single or multiple performances/outputs without axioms. When there are no theoretical models, experimental methods (e.g., the popular and robust Taguchi and Nakazawa design methods) with an orthogonal array are important. Meanwhile, if mathematical or physical models are available, other robust design approaches using, for example, a genetic algorithm, are applicable. The proposed approach is compatible with both experimental and theoretical approaches. The approach is proposed through the minimization of the total difference (i.e., error) between the required specification and experimental output for different variables with noise. We applied the approach to an electric circuit problem to obtain the required specification and target cost. The optimal results are the same as those obtained using the Nakazawa method. Additionally, a genetic-algorithm-based design with a proposed metric, namely the optimal design under contentious variables, is presented. The obtained performance/output better matches the required specification when using the proposed approach than when using the discrete approach. Employing the proposed method, we expect a united robust design without an axiom.

[1]  Messias Borges Silva,et al.  Electrodeposition of copper on titanium wires: Taguchi experimental design approach , 2009 .

[2]  Erdem Koç,et al.  A guide for genetic algorithm based on parallel machine scheduling and flexible job-shop scheduling , 2012 .

[3]  G. Taguchi Quality engineering in japan , 1985 .

[4]  Tomoyuki Hiroyasu,et al.  NCGA: Neighborhood Cultivation Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems , 2002, GECCO Late Breaking Papers.

[5]  Hasan Köten,et al.  Effects of the diesel engine parameters on the ignition delay , 2018 .

[6]  K. K. Prasad,et al.  Xylitol production by Candida sp.: parameter optimization using Taguchi approach , 2004 .

[7]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Evolutionary Computation.

[8]  Manoj Kumar,et al.  Genetic Algorithm: Review and Application , 2010 .

[9]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization , 1993, ICGA.

[10]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  principles in design , 1990 .

[11]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[12]  Kazuo Tatebayashi,et al.  Robustness-Preceded Multi-Criteria Design Optimization – Proposition of New Method Based on Combinational Use of Taguchi Method Concept and Nakazawa Method – , 2007 .

[13]  Phil J Hobbs,et al.  The Taguchi methodology as a statistical tool for biotechnological applications: A critical appraisal , 2008, Biotechnology journal.

[14]  Hiromu Nakazawa,et al.  Study on Product Development Method by Design Navigation Method (Process in Consideration of Interaction Effects among Design Parameters) , 2007 .

[15]  弘 中沢 デザイン・ナビゲーション・メソッドによる製品開発法の研究 , 2001 .

[16]  Genichii Taguchi,et al.  Introduction to quality engineering. designing quality into products a , 1986 .

[17]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[18]  Mustafa Yilmaz,et al.  Compressed Biogas-Diesel Dual-Fuel Engine Optimization Study for Ultralow Emission , 2014 .