Mobile phone brief intervention applications for risky alcohol use among university students: a randomized controlled study

BackgroundBrief interventions via the internet have been shown to reduce university students’ alcohol intake. This study tested two smartphone applications (apps) targeting drinking choices on party occasions, with the goal of reducing problematic alcohol intake among Swedish university students.MethodsStudents were recruited via e-mails sent to student union members at two universities. Those who gave informed consent, had a smartphone, and showed risky alcohol consumption according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) were randomized into three groups. Group 1 had access to the Swedish government alcohol monopoly’s app, Promillekoll, offering real-time estimated blood alcohol concentration (eBAC) calculation; Group 2 had access to a web-based app, PartyPlanner, developed by the research group, offering real-time eBAC calculation with planning and follow-up functions; and Group 3 participants were controls. Follow-up was conducted at 7 weeks.ResultsAmong 28574 students offered participation, 4823 agreed to join; 415 were excluded due to incomplete data, and 1932 fulfilled eligibility criteria for randomization. Attrition was 22.7–39.3 percent, higher among heavier drinkers and highest in Group 2. Self-reported app use was higher in Group 1 (74%) compared to Group 2 (41%). Per-protocol analyses revealed only one significant time-by-group interaction, where Group 1 participants increased the frequency of their drinking occasions compared to controls (p = 0.001). Secondary analyses by gender showed a significant difference among men in Group 1 for frequency of drinking occasions per week (p = 0.001), but not among women. Among all participants, 29 percent showed high-risk drinking, over the recommended weekly drinking levels of 9 (women) and 14 (men) standard glasses.ConclusionsSmartphone apps can make brief interventions available to large numbers of university students. The apps studied using eBAC calculation did not, however, seem to affect alcohol consumption among university students and one app may have led to a negative effect among men. Future research should: 1) explore ways to increase user retention, 2) include apps facilitating technical manipulation for evaluation of added components, 3) explore the effects of adapting app content to possible gender differences, and 4) offer additional interventions to high-risk users.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov: NCT01958398.

[1]  M. Berglund,et al.  Alcohol involvement in Swedish University freshmen related to gender, age, serious relationship and family history of alcohol problems. , 2007, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[2]  K. Carey,et al.  Screening and Brief Interventions for Alcohol Use in College Health Centers: A Review , 2010, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[3]  James G. Murphy,et al.  Changes in protective behavioral strategies and alcohol use among college students. , 2011, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[4]  K. Carey,et al.  Computer-delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analysis. , 2009, Addiction.

[5]  Hans Bergman,et al.  Svenska kvinnor har fått mer riskfyllda och skadligare alkoholvanor: Undersôkning av förändringar i svenskarnas alkoholvanor åren 1997-2001 , 2003 .

[6]  W. Miller,et al.  Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a review. , 1993, Addiction.

[7]  A. H. Berman,et al.  Internet-based assessment and self-monitoring of problematic alcohol and drug use. , 2010, Addictive behaviors.

[8]  K. Carey,et al.  The theory of planned behavior as a model of heavy episodic drinking among college students. , 2007, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[9]  M. Martens,et al.  Do protective behavioral strategies mediate the relationship between drinking motives and alcohol use in college students? , 2007, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[10]  Maristela Monteiro,et al.  AUDIT - The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. , 2001 .

[11]  Kate B. Carey,et al.  Computer-based interventions for college drinking: a qualitative review. , 2008, Addictive behaviors.

[12]  Patrick M. O'Malley,et al.  Monitoring the Future National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings, 2004. , 2003 .

[13]  H. Bergman,et al.  Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the alcohol use disorders identification test. , 2002, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[14]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Curbing problem drinking with personalized-feedback interventions: a meta-analysis. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  P. Nilsen Brief alcohol intervention--where to from here? Challenges remain for research and practice. , 2010, Addiction.

[16]  E. Hannah,et al.  Preventing high-risk drinking in youth in the workplace: a web-based normative feedback program. , 2008, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[17]  N. Jensen,et al.  Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials Addressing Brief Interventions in Heavy Alcohol Drinkers , 1997, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[18]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[19]  Rebecca Jenkinson,et al.  “Let’s get Wasted!” and Other Apps: Characteristics, Acceptability, and Use of Alcohol-Related Smartphone Applications , 2013, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[20]  M. Carta,et al.  The stigma of alcohol dependence compared with other mental disorders: a review of population studies. , 2011, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[21]  A. Öjehagen,et al.  Intervention for hazardous alcohol use and high level of stress in university freshmen A comparison between an intervention and a control University , 2009, Brain Research.

[22]  P. Monti,et al.  Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[23]  A. Team Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials Addressing Brief Interventions in Heavy Alcohol Drinkers , 2010 .

[24]  Zarnie Khadjesari,et al.  On-line Randomized Controlled Trial of an Internet Based Psychologically Enhanced Intervention for People with Hazardous Alcohol Consumption , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  A. H. Berman,et al.  Population screening of risky alcohol and drug use via Internet and Interactive Voice Response (IVR): a feasibility and psychometric study in a random sample. , 2011, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[26]  Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the Drinking Motivations of Social, High-Risk, and Extreme Drinkers on Game Day , 2010, Journal of Community Health.

[27]  M. Larimer,et al.  An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. , 1992, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[28]  Zarnie Khadjesari,et al.  Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review. , 2011, Addiction.

[29]  M. Larimer,et al.  Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. , 2002, Journal of studies on alcohol. Supplement.

[30]  Amy M. Cohn,et al.  Promoting behavior change from alcohol use through mobile technology: the future of ecological momentary assessment. , 2011, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[31]  T. Adams,et al.  Protective Behavioral Strategies and Negative Alcohol-Related Consequences in College Students , 2008, Journal of drug education.

[32]  Mark Conner,et al.  Alcohol Consumption and the Theory of Planned Behavior: An Examination of the Cognitive Mediation of Past Behaviorid , 1999 .

[33]  Claes Andersson Comparison of Automated Technologies to Deliver Brief Alcohol Interventions to University Students , 2012 .

[34]  Mark T. Fillmore PhD and,et al.  Defining “Binge” Drinking as Five Drinks per Occasion or Drinking to a .08% BAC: Which Is More Sensitive to Risk? , 2011 .

[35]  H. Bergman,et al.  [Swedish women have developed more risky and more harmful alcohol drinking habits. A survey of alcohol drinking changes among Swedes between 1997-2001]. , 2003, Lakartidningen.

[36]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[37]  Judy Drennan,et al.  Online Alcohol Interventions: A Systematic Review , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[38]  D. Foxcroft,et al.  Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in university or college students. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[39]  A. González-Pinto,et al.  Brief interventions for hazardous drinkers delivered in primary care are equally effective in men and women. , 2004, Addiction.

[40]  D. Kivlahan,et al.  The Alcohol Skills Training Program: a group intervention for young adult drinkers. , 1994, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[41]  M. Larimer,et al.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[42]  Anne E. Ray,et al.  Social-cognitive correlates of protective drinking behaviors and alcohol-related consequences in college students. , 2009, Addictive behaviors.

[43]  Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[44]  Marc-Dennan Tensil,et al.  Two Fully Automated Web-Based Interventions for Risky Alcohol Use: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[45]  M. Webb Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in University or College students , 2009 .

[46]  Daniel R. Kivlahan,et al.  Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (Basics): A Harm Reduction Approach , 1999 .