A watershed-based method for environmental vulnerability assessment with a case study of the Mid-Atlantic region

Abstract The paper presents a method for environmental vulnerability assessment with a case study of the Mid-Atlantic region. The method is based on the concept of “self-/peer-appraisal” of a watershed in term of vulnerability. The self-/peer-appraisal process is facilitated by two separate linear optimization programs. The analysis provided insights on the environmental conditions, in general, and the relative vulnerability pattern, in particular, of the Mid-Atlantic region. The suggested method offers a simple but effective and objective way to perform a regional environmental vulnerability assessment. Consequently the method can be used in various steps in environmental assessment and planning.

[1]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  D. Lobell,et al.  A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico , 2003 .

[3]  S. Cutter.  Vulnerability to environmental hazards , 1996 .

[4]  M. Rounsevell,et al.  The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change , 2006 .

[5]  Grete Swensen,et al.  Assessing environmental vulnerability in EIA—The content and context of the vulnerability concept in an alternative approach to standard EIA procedure , 2006 .

[6]  Kurt H. Riitters,et al.  Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation , 2000 .

[7]  M. Watts,et al.  The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine , 1993 .

[8]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  The assessment of vulnerability to natural disasters in China by using the DEA method , 2004 .

[9]  J. Benayas,et al.  Identifying areas of high-value vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation , 2003 .

[10]  Robert V. O'Neill,et al.  Integrated Environmental Assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region with Analytical Network Process , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[11]  Liem T. Tran,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps for Integrated Environmental Assessment of the Mid-Atlantic Region , 2003, Environmental management.

[12]  J. Alwang.  Vulnerability : a view from different disciplines , 2001 .

[13]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[14]  P. Harrison,et al.  Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation , 2006 .

[15]  Elizabeth R. Smith,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: An Integrated Environmental Assessment of the US Mid-Atlantic Region , 1999, Environmental management.

[16]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  James D. Wickham,et al.  An ecological assessment of the United States mid-Atlantic region , 1997 .

[18]  R. Leemans,et al.  A Multidisciplinary multi-scale framework for assessing vulnerability to global change , 2004 .

[19]  L. Gunderson.  Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application , 2000 .

[20]  P. Harrison,et al.  Future environmental change impacts on rural land use and biodiversity: a synthesis of the ACCELERATES project , 2006 .

[21]  Elizabeth L. Malone,et al.  VULNERABILITY TO CLIMATE CHANGE A Quantitative Approach , 2001 .

[22]  J. Morduch.  Poverty and Vulnerability , 1994 .

[23]  Jesse C. Ribot.  Climate Variability, Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the Semi-arid Tropics: Introduction. Climate Variability, Climate Change and Vulnerability: Moving Forward by Looking Back , 1996 .

[24]  W. Adger.  Social Vulnerability to Climate Change and Extremes in Coastal Vietnam , 1999 .