Using uncertain preferential information from stakeholders to assess the acceptability of alternative forest management plans

All material supplied via JYX is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, and duplication or sale of all or part of any of the repository collections is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for your research use or educational purposes in electronic or print form. You must obtain permission for any other use. Electronic or print copies may not be offered, whether for sale or otherwise to anyone who is not an authorised user. Using uncertain preferential information from stakeholders to assess the acceptability of alternative forest management plans Eyvindson, Kyle; Öhman, Karin; Nordström, Eva‐Maria

[1]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Aggregation of preferences in participatory forest planning with multiple criteria: an application to the urban forest in Lycksele, Sweden , 2009 .

[3]  David P. Morton,et al.  A Sequential Sampling Procedure for Stochastic Programming , 2011, Oper. Res..

[4]  Ian N. Durbach,et al.  Modelling uncertainty in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis , 2016 .

[5]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[6]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  Multicriteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons , 1989 .

[7]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[8]  Alexander Shapiro,et al.  The Sample Average Approximation Method for Stochastic Discrete Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[9]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms , 2006 .

[10]  S. Sheppard,et al.  Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups , 2005 .

[11]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  SMAA - Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  J. Kangas,et al.  Interactive decision analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences from state owned boreal forests. , 1999 .

[13]  N. Khabarov,et al.  Global bioenergy scenarios – Future forest development, land-use implications, and trade-offs , 2013 .

[14]  Teppo Hujala,et al.  Computer-based tools for supporting forest management. The experience and the expertise world-wide , 2014 .

[15]  Tommi Tervonen,et al.  Hit-And-Run enables efficient weight generation for simulation-based multiple criteria decision analysis , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  EyvindsonKyle,et al.  Stochastic goal programming in forest planning , 2014 .

[17]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Rank-based modelling of preferences in multi-criteria decision making , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Mikko Kurttila,et al.  Mesta: An internet-based decision-support application for participatory strategic-level natural resources planning , 2009 .

[19]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  SMAA-2: Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis for Group Decision Making , 2001, Oper. Res..

[20]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning , 2003 .

[21]  Pekka Leskinen,et al.  Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences gained from western Finland , 2007 .

[22]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Applying Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis to Forest Ecosystem Management with Both Cardinal and Ordinal Criteria , 2003 .

[23]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[24]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[25]  Tommi Tervonen,et al.  Implementing stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Keun-Tae Cho,et al.  A loss function approach to group preference aggregation in the AHP , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[27]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning , 2009 .

[28]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment , 2008 .

[29]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  A participatory approach to tactical forest planning , 1996 .

[30]  Valerie Belton,et al.  A Framework for Group Decision Using a MCDA Model: Sharing, Aggregating or Comparing Individual Information? , 1997 .

[31]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning , 2001 .

[32]  Eva-Maria Nordström,et al.  Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden , 2010 .

[33]  M. T. Escobar,et al.  Aggregation of Individual Preference Structures in Ahp-Group Decision Making , 2007 .

[34]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .

[35]  C. Romero.  Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach , 2001 .

[36]  Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson,et al.  Generating consensus priority point vectors: a logarithmic goal programming approach , 1999, Comput. Oper. Res..

[37]  Jacinto González-Pachón,et al.  Inferring consensus weights from pairwise comparison matrices without suitable properties , 2007, Ann. Oper. Res..

[38]  R. Keeney.  Decision analysis: an overview. , 1982, Operations research.

[39]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Feature Article - Decision Analysis: An Overview , 1982, Oper. Res..