Closing the gap: towards a process model of post‐merger knowledge sharing

Abstract.  We develop a process model of post‐merger knowledge sharing based on distributed cognition, a systems perspective and path dependence. The framework conceptualizes knowledge sharing by layers of management choice and employee appropriation of knowledge resources seen as knowledge as content and knowledge as connection. We use the framework to study a merger of two polymer companies. The study reveals that mergers represent a discontinuity in knowledge sharing. Yet, chosen strategies often mirror the learned knowledge‐sharing practices of one of the merged companies and match poorly with the post‐merger knowledge‐sharing needs. Five factors emerged contribute to this knowledge gap: (a) the nature of the merger; (b) a lack of shared context; (c) the incompatibility of existing knowledge systems; (d) the tacit dimension of knowledge; and (e) time pressures of the merger. Our study shows that, employees enacted knowledge new sharing practices that differed significantly from the official strategy to close to the post‐merger knowledge gap.

[1]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[2]  D. Teece.  Research Directions for Knowledge Management , 1998 .

[3]  Mani R. Subramani,et al.  Situated Learning and the Situated Knowledge Web: Exploring the Ground Beneath Knowledge Management , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[5]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[6]  W. Pasmore,et al.  Sociotechnical Systems: A North American Reflection on Empirical Studies of the Seventies , 1982 .

[7]  R NidumoluSarma,et al.  Situated Learning and the Situated Knowledge Web , 2001 .

[8]  Jean-Paul A. Barthès,et al.  Knowledge Management , 1994, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[10]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Industry Boundaries: Human Expertise, Diversification and Resource-Related Industry Groups , 1994 .

[11]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[12]  Roberto A. Weber,et al.  Cultural Conflict and Merger Failure: An Experimental Approach , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[13]  John L. Graham.  Book Review: The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances , 1993 .

[14]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Understanding Acquisition Performance: The Role of Transfer Effects , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[15]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[16]  Mark E. Nissen,et al.  Dynamic Knowledge Patterns to Inform Design: A Field Study of Knowledge Stocks and Flows in an Extreme Organization , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing the knowledge life cycle , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[18]  Rod Coombs,et al.  `Knowledge management practices' and path-dependency in innovation , 1998 .

[19]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[20]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[21]  H. Barkema,et al.  Learning Through Acquisitions , 2001 .

[22]  Klaus E. Meyer,et al.  Post‐Acquisition Restructuring as Evolutionary Process* , 2003 .

[23]  A. Seth.  Value creation in acquisitions: A re‐examination of performance issues , 1990 .

[24]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[25]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing the Post-acquisition Integration Process: How the Human Iintegration and Task Integration Processes Interact to Foster Value Creation , 2000 .

[26]  M. C. Jensen.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, And The Failure Of Internal Control Systems , 1994 .

[27]  Thomas H. Brush.  PREDICTED CHANGE IN OPERATIONAL SYNERGY AND POST‐ACQUISITION PERFORMANCE OF ACQUIRED BUSINESSES , 1996 .

[28]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[29]  R. Rommetveit.  On Message Structure: A Framework for the Study of Language and Communication , 1976, Dance Research Journal.

[30]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation , 2013 .

[31]  James E. Short,et al.  SIM Paper Competition: Managing the Merger: Building Partnership Through IT Planning at the New Baxter , 1989, MIS Q..

[32]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[33]  R CarlilePaul.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries , 2002 .

[34]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Takeovers in the '60s and the '80s: Evidence and Implications , 1991 .

[35]  Linda Argote,et al.  Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. , 1996 .

[36]  M. Hammer,et al.  How process enterprises really work. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[37]  H. Smalley.  The systems approach. , 1972, Hospitals.

[38]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[39]  P. Blau.  Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure , 1978 .

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[41]  R. Olie,et al.  Shades of Culture and Institutions-in International Mergers , 1994 .

[42]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[44]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[45]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[46]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[47]  Alice Lam.  Embedded Firms, Embedded Knowledge: Problems of Collaboration and Knowledge Transfer in Global Cooperative Ventures , 1997 .

[48]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[49]  R. Grant.  Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[50]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[51]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Management of Knowledge: The Case of Infosys Technologies , 2005, MIS Q..

[52]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[53]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Beyond socio-technical systems: introduction to the special issue , 2001 .

[54]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[56]  S. Finkelstein,et al.  Integrating Strategic, Organizational, and Human Resource Perspectives on Mergers and Acquisitions: a Case Study of Synergy Realization , 1999 .

[57]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[58]  Annette L. Ranft,et al.  Acquiring New Technologies and Capabilities: A Grounded Model of Acquisition Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[59]  M. Lubatkin,et al.  CULTURAL DIFFERENCES AND SHAREHOLDER VALUE IN RELATED MERGERS: LINKING EQUITY AND HUMAN CAPITAL , 1992 .

[60]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[61]  Toru Yoshikawa,et al.  Technology development and acquisition strategy , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[62]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[63]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[64]  L. Sproull,et al.  Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams , 2000 .

[65]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[66]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[67]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[68]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[69]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[70]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[71]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[72]  Anca Mândruleanu.  Knowledge Dynamics , 2008 .

[73]  FinkelsteinSydney,et al.  Understanding Acquisition Performance , 2002 .

[74]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions , 2002, MIS Q..

[75]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[76]  Tadao Sumi,et al.  Ramp new enterprise information systems in a merger & acquisition environment: a case study , 2002 .

[77]  Aaron M. Brower,et al.  What's Social about Social Cognition?: Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups , 1996 .

[78]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .