Systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of positron-emission tomography in staging of non--small-cell lung cancer and management of solitary pulmonary nodules.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Peres. Lung cancer screening: ready for prime time? , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[2] J. Mortensen,et al. Preoperative staging of lung cancer with PET/CT: cost-effectiveness evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[3] A. Dirksen,et al. Multimodality approach to mediastinal staging in non-small cell lung cancer. Faults and benefits of PET-CT: a randomised trial , 2010, Thorax.
[4] F. Mottaghy,et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Hybrid PET/CT for Staging of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[5] Y. Ung,et al. Positron Emission Tomography in Staging Early Lung Cancer , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[6] L. Santambrogio,et al. Staging non-small lung cancer with positron emission tomography: diagnostic value, impact on patient management, and cost-effectiveness. , 2008, International surgery.
[7] Y. Ung,et al. 18Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer: a systematic review. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[8] M. Lock,et al. Systematic review of baseline low-dose CT lung cancer screening. , 2007, Lung cancer.
[9] I. Bradbury,et al. Overview of the clinical effectiveness of positron emission tomography imaging in selected cancers. , 2007, Health technology assessment.
[10] F. Fazio,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the clinical management of patients with known or suspected lung cancer: [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET and CT comparison. , 2007, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....
[11] H. Groen,et al. Traditional versus up-front [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch cooperative randomized study. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[12] R. Munden,et al. Imaging of the patient with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Radiology.
[13] A. Bernard,et al. Use of a decision analysis model to assess the medicoeconomic implications of FDG PET imaging in diagnosing a solitary pulmonary nodule , 2005, The European Journal of Health Economics.
[14] T. Bilfinger,et al. The impact of positron emission tomography on clinical decision making in a university-based multidisciplinary lung cancer practice. , 2005, Chest.
[15] S. Kosuda,et al. Should mediastinoscopy actually be incorporated into the FDG PET strategy for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma? , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.
[16] C. Rowe,et al. Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[17] F. Guillemin,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of strategies introducing FDG-PET into the mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer from the French healthcare system perspective. , 2005, Clinical radiology.
[18] J. Bogaert,et al. Role of computed tomography in lung cancer staging , 2004, Current opinion in pulmonary medicine.
[19] M. King,et al. Randomized controlled trial of the role of positron emission tomography in the management of stage I and II non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[20] M. Mathews,et al. Cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography for non-small cell lung carcinoma in Canada. , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.
[21] Y. Tsushima,et al. Analysis models to assess cost effectiveness of the four strategies for the work-up of solitary pulmonary nodules. , 2004, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.
[22] F. Fazio,et al. Economic analyses on the use of positron emission tomography for the work-up of solitary pulmonary nodules and for staging patients with non-small-cell-lung-cancer in Italy. , 2004, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....
[23] S. Kosuda,et al. Medical economics of whole-body FDG PET in patients suspected of having non-small cell lung carcinoma—Reassessment based on the revised Japanese national insurance reimbursement system , 2003, Annals of nuclear medicine.
[24] P. Bossuyt,et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology , 2002 .
[25] G. Bepler,et al. A systematic review and lessons learned from early lung cancer detection trials using low-dose computed tomography of the chest. , 2003, Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center.
[26] M. Boers,et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[27] Paul Barnett,et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[28] Sean D Sullivan,et al. Development and Validation of a Grading System for the Quality of Cost-Effectiveness Studies , 2003, Medical care.
[29] S. Kosuda,et al. Decision-tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of whole-body FDG PET in the management of patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma in Japan , 2002, Annals of nuclear medicine.
[30] K. Miles,et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: accuracy and cost-effectiveness of sodium iodide FDG-PET using Australian data , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[31] M. Boers,et al. Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.
[32] M. Liebow,et al. Cost-minimization analysis of alternative diagnostic approaches in a modeled patient with non-small cell lung cancer and subcarinal lymphadenopathy. , 2002, Mayo Clinic proceedings.
[33] K. Miles. An approach to demonstrating cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging modalities in Australia illustrated by positron emission tomography. , 2001, Australasian radiology.
[34] A. Gandjour,et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[35] A. Gandjour,et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of solitary pulmonary nodules: a decision analysis based on cost reimbursement in Germany , 2000, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[36] S. Sone,et al. Characteristics of small lung cancers invisible on conventional chest radiography and detected by population based screening using spiral CT. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.
[37] S. Kosuda,et al. Decision-tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of chest 2-fluoro-2-D-[(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with pulmonary nodules (non-small cell lung carcinoma) in Japan. , 2000, Chest.
[38] S. Kosuda,et al. [Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of chest FDG-PET in patients with a pulmonary tumor (non-small cell carcinoma)]. , 1998, Kaku igaku. The Japanese journal of nuclear medicine.
[39] J. Shepherd,et al. Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for staging non-small cell lung cancer: a decision analysis. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[40] P. Valk,et al. Analytical decision model for the cost-effective management of solitary pulmonary nodules. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[41] S S Gambhir,et al. Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[42] P. Valk,et al. Cost-effectiveness of PET imaging in clinical oncology. , 1996, Nuclear medicine and biology.
[43] N. Müller,et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma: utility of CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected lesions. , 1994, Radiology.
[44] A S Detsky,et al. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.
[45] E H Moore,et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma: analysis of staging in the mediastinum with CT by correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. , 1992, Radiology.
[46] B J McNeil,et al. CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: report of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group. , 1991, Radiology.
[47] M. Drummond,et al. Health Care Technology: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Public Policy@@@Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes , 1988 .
[48] F MURRAY,et al. Diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. , 1955, Geriatrics.
[49] F. Kee,et al. The value of positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2010, European journal of radiology.
[50] Y. Lacasse,et al. Cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer in Quebec. , 2005, Canadian respiratory journal.
[51] J. Hay,et al. Examining the Value and Quality of Health Economic Analyses: Implications of Utilizing the QHES , 2003, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.
[52] V Kalff,et al. Clinical impact of (18)F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[53] R. Peto,et al. Tobacco—the growing epidemic , 1999, Nature Medicine.
[54] Douglas L. Weed,et al. Methodologic Guidelines for Review Papers , 1997 .