Aerial performance of Drosophila melanogaster from populations selected for upwind flight ability.

A computerized system for three-dimensional tracking of large numbers of individual free-flying insects was used to assess the performance of Drosophila melanogaster from populations that had undergone 160 generations of selection for upwind flight ability. Compared with control lines, the selected lines showed significant increases in mean flight velocity, decreases in angular trajectory and a significant change in the interaction between velocity and angular trajectory. Maximal flight velocity was apparent as a sharply defined upper boundary of the distribution of horizontal and vertical velocity as a function of angular trajectory; this upper bound (0.85 ms-1) differed little between the selected and control lines, although individuals from the selected lines attained maximal performance levels much more frequently. Maximum induced power output was calculated directly from the product of maximum vertical velocity and body weight. This measure (28 W kg-1 muscle) was closely predicted by a scaling relationship derived from the load-lifting limits of larger insects and vertebrates, as well as tethered D. melanogaster stimulated via their optomotor reflex to produce maximal lift. These results indicate that selection for flight performance can readily alter the relative effort and/or the frequency of phenotypes capable of attaining population-wise maximal performance levels, but shows little ability to increase population-wise maximal performance.

[1]  R. Dudley,et al.  Limits to vertebrate locomotor energetics suggested by hummingbirds hovering in heliox , 1995, Nature.

[2]  Dudley Extraordinary flight performance of orchid bees (Apidae: Euglossini) hovering in heliox (80% He/20% O2) , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  A. R. Ennos The kinematics and aerodynamics of the free flight of some diptera , 1989 .

[4]  M. R. Fuller,et al.  Climbing performance of Harris' hawks ( Parabuteo unicinctus ) with added load: implications for muscle mechanics and for radiotracking , 1989 .

[5]  Wind-controlled selection of motion detectors in the eyes of Drosophila melanogaster , 1983 .

[6]  James H. Marden,et al.  Aerial Predation and Butterfly Design: How Palatability, Mimicry, and the Need for Evasive Flight Constrain Mass Allocation , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[7]  K. Weber Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: rethinking fitness surfaces. , 1996, Genetics.

[8]  C. H. Blake,et al.  Locomotor Mechanisms of Birds , 1962 .

[9]  C. Ellington Limitations on Animal Flight Performance , 1991 .

[10]  C. David The relationship between body angle and flight speed in free‐flying Drosophila , 1978 .

[11]  J. Marden Bodybuilding Dragonflies: Costs and Benefits of Maximizing Flight Muscle , 1989, Physiological Zoology.

[12]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The changes in power requirements and muscle efficiency during elevated force production in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  J. Marden Maximum Lift Production During Takeoff in Flying Animals , 1987 .

[14]  J. Marden Short Communication: Maximum Load-Lifting and Induced Power Output of Harris' Hawks are General Functions of Flight Muscle Mass , 1990 .

[15]  J. Curtsinger,et al.  Genetic Variability of Flight Metabolism in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. Characterization of Power Output during Tethered Flight. , 1981, Genetics.

[16]  S. Vogel Flight in Drosophila : I. Flight Performance of Tethered Flies , 1966 .

[17]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Muscle efficiency and elastic storage in the flight motor of Drosophila. , 1995, Science.

[18]  R Dudley,et al.  Transient hovering performance of hummingbirds under conditions of maximal loading. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  K. Götz,et al.  The Wing Beat of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Dynamics , 1990 .

[20]  S. Vogel Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow , 1981 .

[21]  J. Marden From damselflies to pterosaurs: how burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  Mark W. Denny,et al.  The largest, smallest, highest, lowest, longest, and shortest: extremes in ecology , 1993 .