Curriculum differentiation: multiple perspectives and developments in education

This paper examines curriculum differentiation (i.e. streaming or ability‐grouping). After placing curriculum differentiation in an international perspective, it outlines the main conclusions from empirical research on differentiation over several decades. Against this empirical background, it describes and considers the three specific orientations towards curriculum differentiation: a genetic perspective, a cultural perspective, and a sociological perspective. The insights from the various perspectives are integrated and expanded in a framework of curriculum theory, research, and practice.

[1]  Jan Terwel,et al.  Hans Freudenthal: A mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory , 2000 .

[2]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  Ability Grouping and Student Learning , 2003 .

[3]  J. Douglas Willms,et al.  The Balance Thesis: contextual effects of ability on pupils’ O‐grade examination results , 1985 .

[4]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .

[5]  J. Douglas Willms,et al.  Social Class Segregation and Its Relationship to Pupils' Examination Results in Scotland , 1986 .

[6]  Vu,et al.  Real Maths in Cooperative Groups in Secondary Education , 1990 .

[7]  Christine Keitel.  What Are the Goals of Mathematics For All , 1987 .

[8]  R. Burns,et al.  Class Composition and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools , 2002 .

[9]  Jan Terwel,et al.  Curriculum and Curriculum Differentiation , 2004 .

[10]  J. Dewey.  The child and the curriculum , 1902 .

[11]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  The bell curve : intelligence and class structure in American life , 1995 .

[12]  J. Oakes,et al.  Matchmaking: The Dynamics of High School Tracking Decisions , 1995 .

[13]  U. Bronfenbrenner,et al.  The ecology of developmental processes. , 1998 .

[14]  Elizabeth Glennie,et al.  The Matthew effect in American education. , 1999 .

[15]  Jan Terwel,et al.  Evaluation of a mathematics curriculum: Differential effects , 1994 .

[16]  Jan Terwel,et al.  Co-operative learning and adaptive instruction in a mathematics curriculum , 1994 .

[17]  R. Gillies,et al.  Co-operative learning processes of students: a longitudinal multilevel perspective. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[18]  Vu,et al.  Curriculum as a shaping force. Toward a principled approach in curriculum theory and practice , 2004 .

[19]  Hans Freudenthal,et al.  Weeding and Sowing: Preface to a Science of Mathematical Education , 1977 .

[20]  Mieke Brekelmans,et al.  Student characteristics and learning environment interactions in mathematics and physics education: a resource perspective , 1997 .

[21]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  The Bell Curve , 1994 .

[22]  Diane Reay,et al.  Setting the Agenda: The Growing Impact of Market Forces on Pupil Grouping in British Secondary Schooling. , 1998 .

[23]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Contemporary research on parenting. The case for nature and nurture. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[24]  Karin Westerbeek,et al.  The colours of my classroom : a study into the effects of the ethnic composition of classrooms on the achievement of pupils from different ethnic backgrounds , 1999 .

[25]  A. Wells,et al.  Choosing Tracks:“Freedom of Choice” in Detracking Schools , 2002 .

[26]  Michael Wertheimer,et al.  The Raising of Intelligence: A Selected History of Attempts to Raise , 1986 .

[27]  Hugh Lauder,et al.  School Composition and Peer Effects. , 2002 .

[28]  Marian Perkins,et al.  The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Willem Wardekker,et al.  Curriculum as Vision , 2004 .

[30]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Durable Inequality , 2004 .

[31]  Michael H. Harris,et al.  : The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life , 1996 .

[32]  Marc Stears.  Education as Politics , 2006 .

[33]  Nura Resh,et al.  Injustice in Schools: Perception of Deprivation and Classroom Composition , 1999 .

[34]  Linda Valli,et al.  Curriculum differentiation : interpretive studies in U.S. secondary schools , 1990 .

[35]  Charles Edison,et al.  Education in politics , 1943 .

[36]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  Curriculum Differentiation and High School Achievement , 1999 .

[37]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  The Social organization of schools : new conceptualizations of the learning process , 1987 .

[38]  B.H.A.M. van Hout-Wolters,et al.  Effecten van een didactische interventie bij het leren in kleine groepen in de basisvorming. , 2000 .

[39]  Richard A. Weinberg,et al.  The raising of intelligence: A selected history of attempts to raise retarded intelligence: Spitz, Herman H. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1986 , 1988 .

[40]  Alfred Yates.  Grouping in education : a report sponsored by the Unesco Institute for Education, Hamburg. , 1966 .

[41]  J. Dewey.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[42]  N. Webb.  Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[43]  Jan Terwel,et al.  Cooperative learning in secondary education: a curriculum perspective. , 2003 .

[44]  Saul B Robinsohn,et al.  Schulreform und Gesellschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1946-1966 : die Differenzierung der Bildungswege als Problem der westdeutschen Schulpolitik , 1970 .

[45]  R. Mickelson.  Subverting Swann: First- and Second-Generation Segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools , 2001 .

[46]  Robert Plomin.  The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do , 1999 .

[47]  Gary Orfield,et al.  Resegregation in American Schools. , 1999 .

[48]  Carol D. Lee.  Is October Brown Chinese? A Cultural Modeling Activity System for Underachieving Students , 2001 .

[49]  H. Freudenthal.  Mathematics as an Educational Task , 1972 .

[50]  J. Hattie.  Classroom Composition and Peer Effects. , 2002 .

[51]  Roy Lowe.  The educational impact of the eugenics movement , 1998 .