Mapping of Chromosome 1p Deletions in Myeloma Identifies FAM46C at 1p12 and CDKN2C at 1p32.3 as Being Genes in Regions Associated with Adverse Survival

Purpose: Regions on 1p with recurrent deletions in presenting myeloma patients were examined with the purpose of defining the deletions and assessing their survival impact. Experimental Design: Gene mapping, gene expression, FISH, and mutation analyses were conducted on patient samples from the MRC Myeloma IX trial and correlated with clinical outcome data. Results: 1p32.3 was deleted in 11% of cases, and deletion was strongly associated with impaired overall survival (OS) in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In patients treated less intensively, del(1)(p32.3) was not associated with adverse progression-free survival (PFS) or OS. The target of homozygous deletions was CDKN2C, however its role in the adverse outcome of cases with hemizygous deletion was less certain. 1p22.1-21.2 was the most frequently deleted region and contained the candidate genes MTF2 and TMED5. No mutations were identified in these genes. 1p12 was deleted in 19% of cases, and deletion was associated with impaired OS in univariate analysis. The target of homozygous deletion was FAM46C, which was mutated in 3.4% of cases. When cases with FAM46C deletion or mutation were considered together, they were strongly associated with impaired OS in the intensive treatment setting. Conclusion: Deletion of 1p32.3 and 1p12 was associated with impaired OS in myeloma patients receiving ASCT. FAM46C was identified as a gene with potential pathogenic and prognostic significance based on the occurrence of recurrent homozygous deletions and mutations. Clin Cancer Res; 17(24); 7776–84. ©2011 AACR.

[1]  G. Morgan,et al.  A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial , 2011, Leukemia.

[2]  G. Morgan,et al.  The clinical impact and molecular biology of del(17p) in multiple myeloma treated with conventional or thalidomide‐based therapy , 2011, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[3]  G. Morgan,et al.  Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) as initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma unsuitable for autologous transplantation. , 2011, Blood.

[4]  Trevor J Pugh,et al.  Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma , 2011, Nature.

[5]  Fiona M Ross,et al.  Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. , 2011, Blood.

[6]  G. Morgan,et al.  First-line treatment with zoledronic acid as compared with clodronic acid in multiple myeloma (MRC Myeloma IX): a randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[7]  G. Morgan,et al.  A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value. , 2010, Blood.

[8]  G. Morgan,et al.  The t(14;20) is a poor prognostic factor in myeloma but is associated with long-term stable disease in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance , 2010, Haematologica.

[9]  J. Carpten,et al.  Correlation between array-comparative genomic hybridization-defined genomic gains and losses and survival: identification of 1p31-32 deletion as a prognostic factor in myeloma , 2010, Leukemia.

[10]  G. Morgan,et al.  Homozygous Deletion Mapping in Myeloma Samples Identifies Genes and an Expression Signature Relevant to Pathogenesis and Outcome , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  N. Cross,et al.  Timing of acquisition of deletion 13 in plasma cell dyscrasias is dependent on genetic context , 2009, Haematologica.

[12]  B. Barlogie,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: spotlight review , 2009, Leukemia.

[13]  G. Morgan,et al.  Deletions of CDKN2C in Multiple Myeloma: Biological and Clinical Implications , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  G. Morgan,et al.  Gene mapping and expression analysis of 16q loss of heterozygosity identifies WWOX and CYLD as being important in determining clinical outcome in multiple myeloma. , 2007, Blood.

[15]  Michael L. Wang,et al.  Deletion of the short arm of chromosome 1 (del 1p) is a strong predictor of poor outcome in myeloma patients undergoing an autotransplant. , 2007, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[16]  R. Bataille,et al.  Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. , 2007, Blood.

[17]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Abnormalities of chromosome 1p/q are highly associated with chromosome 13/13q deletions and are an adverse prognostic factor for the outcome of high‐dose chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma , 2007, British journal of haematology.

[18]  F. Zhan,et al.  Paradoxical expression of INK4c in proliferative multiple myeloma tumors: bi-allelic deletion vs increased expression , 2006, Cell Division.

[19]  Cheng Li,et al.  Integration of global SNP-based mapping and expression arrays reveals key regions, mechanisms, and genes important in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. , 2006, Blood.

[20]  Yongsheng Huang,et al.  Frequent gain of chromosome band 1q21 in plasma-cell dyscrasias detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization: incidence increases from MGUS to relapsed myeloma and is related to prognosis and disease progression following tandem stem-cell transplantation. , 2006, Blood.

[21]  G. Morgan,et al.  Deletion of chromosome 13 detected by conventional cytogenetics is a critical prognostic factor in myeloma , 2006, Leukemia.

[22]  P. L. Bergsagel,et al.  Molecular pathogenesis and a consequent classification of multiple myeloma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  M. Rue,et al.  Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma. , 2003, Blood.