Performance study of co-located IEEE 802.15.4-TSCH networks: Interference and coexistence

With the large deployment of smart and heterogeneous devices, interest of researchers to define new protocols to meet Internet of Things (IoT) requirements is growing. A particular interest was accorded to define a robust MAC layer for wireless sensor networks, in order to reduce interference caused by other co-located networks and applications using the ISM band. This paper gives a comprehensive study of the Time Slotted channel Hopping IEEE802.15.4, part of the 6TiSCH stack and explains how its TDMA approach improves the reliability with performance guarantees. We also investigate analytically and experimentally the impact of the scheduling algorithm on the reliability. Then, we provide an experimental evaluation of co-located WSN using the FiT-IoT LAB testbed and the OpenWSN Stack. Performance analysis of IEEE802.15.4e-TSCH is achieved with a variable number of co-located synchronized or unsynchronized instances. While this standard is robust for lightly loaded networks, new mechanisms have to be proposed when we have too much traffic or too many interfering networks.

[1]  Fabrice Theoleyre,et al.  Adaptive IEEE 802.15.4 MAC for Throughput and Energy Optimization , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems.

[2]  Lawrence Wai-Choong Wong,et al.  A lightweight inter-user interference mitigation method in Body Sensor Networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[3]  Andreas Terzis,et al.  Surviving wi-fi interference in low power ZigBee networks , 2010, SenSys '10.

[4]  Thiemo Voigt,et al.  SoNIC: Classifying interference in 802.15.4 sensor networks , 2013, 2013 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN).

[5]  Thomas Watteyne,et al.  Adaptive synchronization in multi-hop TSCH networks , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[6]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  A survey of wireless technologies coexistence in WBAN: analysis and open research issues , 2014, Wireless Networks.

[7]  Janne Riihijärvi,et al.  Performance study of IEEE 802.15.4 using measurements and simulations , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006..

[8]  Chiara Buratti,et al.  Capture effect in IEEE 802.15.4 networks: Modelling and experimentation , 2010, IEEE 5th International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing 2010.

[9]  Roger Wattenhofer,et al.  Towards a zero-configuration wireless sensor network architecture for smart buildings , 2009, BuildSys '09.

[10]  João Carlos Giacomin,et al.  DynMAC: A resistant MAC protocol to coexistence in wireless sensor networks , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Gennaro Boggia,et al.  Standardized Protocol Stack for the Internet of (Important) Things , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Matteo Bertocco,et al.  Experimental Study of Coexistence Issues Between IEEE 802.11b and IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[13]  Youssef Iraqi,et al.  Prevention of collisions among two Wireless Personal Area Networks , 2014, 2014 7th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC).