Ethics in social media marketing

Purpose Consumer-generated online product reviews (OPRs) have become a crucial source of information for consumers; however, OPRs are increasingly being incentivized. The purpose of this paper is to find a method of sponsorship and disclosure that could be considered ethically sound. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a quasi-experimental approach to clarifying how the method of sponsorship impacts reader perceptions of OPRs in terms of helpfulness, credibility and purchase intention. Two experiments were performed on an online platform using data from 480 participants. Hypotheses were tested using analysis of covariance. Findings Meaning under the premise that sponsorship information is disclosed and not withheld from the readers, Study 1 revealed that experiential sponsorship is the best sponsorship. Study 2 revealed that featuring reviewers with greater influence in the online community increases the positive influence of disclosing experiential sponsorship on OPR persuasiveness. Originality/value The findings in this study provide rational incentives for firms to disclose sponsorship information, i.e. demonstrate high ethical standards in marketing. This was shown to create a win-win-win situation for consumers, firms and reviewers. Managerial implications for online marketing managers are also discussed.

[1]  James Ryan O. Jonas.  SOURCE CREDIBILITY OF COMPANY-PRODUCED AND USER-GENERATED CONTENT ON THE INTERNET: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY ON THE FILIPINO YOUTH , 2010 .

[2]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Effects of conflicting aggregated rating on eWOM review credibility and diagnosticity: The moderating role of review valence , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  A. Stephen,et al.  Does Paying for Online Product Reviews Pay Off? The Effects of Monetary Incentives on Consumers’ Product Evaluations , 2012 .

[4]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[5]  Do-Hyung Park,et al.  eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[6]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Helpfulness of Online Product Reviews as Seen by Consumers: Source and Content Features , 2013, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[7]  Tryvertising - What Makes Consumers Share Product Innovations With Others? , 2014 .

[8]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  Receiver responses to rewarded referrals: the motive inferences framework , 2013 .

[9]  Ling Peng,et al.  The Comparative Impact of Critics and Consumers: Applying the Generalisability Theory to Online Movie Ratings , 2013 .

[10]  R. Busse,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of an Accountable Care Organization on Population Health: The Quasi-Experimental Design of the German Gesundes Kinzigtal. , 2017, Population health management.

[11]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[12]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Virtual Community Informatics: A Review and Research Agenda , 2003 .

[14]  Yue Pan,et al.  Born Unequal: A Study of the Helpfulness of User-Generated Product Reviews , 2011 .

[15]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[16]  Saad A. Alhoqail,et al.  How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis , 2014 .

[17]  Feng Li,et al.  Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Huaping Chen,et al.  Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[20]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  Understanding how bloggers feel: recognizing affect in blog posts , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[21]  William B. Dodds,et al.  Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations , 1991 .

[22]  Chris Fullwood,et al.  Blog Function Revisited: A Content Analysis of MySpace Blogs , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[23]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effects of Consumer Knowledge on Message Processing of Electronic Word of Mouth via Online Consumer Reviews , 2008, ECIS.

[24]  Yongjun Sung,et al.  Shifting Selves and Product Reviews: How the Effects of Product Reviews Vary Depending on the Self-Views and Self-Regulatory Goals of Consumers , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[25]  C. Carr,et al.  The Effect of Disclosure of Third-Party Influence on an Opinion Leader's Credibility and Electronic Word of Mouth in Two-Step Flow , 2014 .

[26]  Sarah J. S. Wilner,et al.  Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities , 2009 .

[27]  Yoori Hwang,et al.  "This is a sponsored blog post, but all opinions are my own": The effects of sponsorship disclosure on responses to sponsored blog posts , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Matthew L. Jensen,et al.  Prominence and Interpretation of Online Conflict of Interest Disclosures , 2017, MIS Q..

[29]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Understanding the Intention of Information Contribution to Online Feedback Systems from Social Exchange and Motivation Crowding Perspectives , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[30]  Savita Bhat,et al.  The Effects of Credible Online Reviews on Brand Equity Dimensions and Its Consequence on Consumer Behavior , 2018 .

[31]  Wen-Chin Tsao,et al.  eWOM persuasiveness: do eWOM platforms and product type matter? , 2015, Electron. Commer. Res..

[32]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Information Transparency Pays: Evidence from European Property Shares , 2001 .

[33]  Doori Song,et al.  When brand-related UGC induces effectiveness on social media: the role of content sponsorship and content type , 2018, Electronic Word of Mouth as a Promotional Technique.

[34]  Yong Cao,et al.  Opinions, Recommendations and Endorsements: The New Regulatory Framework for Social Media , 2010 .

[35]  Wen-Chin Tsao,et al.  Intensifying online loyalty! The power of website quality and the perceived value of consumer/seller relationship , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[36]  Jason Q. Zhang,et al.  When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews☆ , 2010 .

[37]  Joon Yeon Choeh,et al.  The interactive impact of online word-of-mouth and review helpfulness on box office revenue , 2018 .

[38]  Nick Hajli,et al.  Ethical Environment in the Online Communities by Information Credibility: A Social Media Perspective , 2016, Journal of Business Ethics.

[39]  Hsiu-Hua Chang,et al.  Consumer attitudes toward blogger's sponsored recommendations and purchase intention: The effect of sponsorship type, product type, and brand awareness , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Nancy Spears,et al.  Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions , 2004 .

[41]  Wen-Chin Tsao,et al.  Compliance with eWOM: the influence of hotel reviews on booking intention from the perspective of consumer conformity. , 2015 .

[42]  Wen-Chin Tsao,et al.  Which type of online review is more persuasive? The influence of consumer reviews and critic ratings on moviegoers , 2014, Electron. Commer. Res..