Endotoxin and dust at respirable and nonrespirable particle sizes are not consistent between cage- and floor-housed poultry operations.

BACKGROUND Individuals engaged in work in intensive animal houses experience some of the highest rates of occupationally related respiratory symptoms. Organic dust and in particular endotoxin has been most closely associated with respiratory symptoms and lung function changes in workers. It has previously been shown that for intensive poultry operations, type of poultry housing [cage-housed (CH) versus floor-housed (FH)] can influence the levels of environmental contaminants. The goal of the study was to determine the differences in endotoxin and dust levels at different size fractions between CH and FH poultry operations. METHODS Fifteen CH and 15 FH poultry operations were sampled for stationary measurements (area) of dust and associated endotoxin. Fractioned samples were collected utilizing Marple cascade impactors. Gravimetric and endotoxin analysis were conducted on each of the filters. RESULTS When assessed by individual Marple stage, there was significantly greater airborne endotoxin concentration (endotoxin units per cubic meter) in the size fraction >9.8 μm for the FH operations whereas at the size fraction 1.6-3.5 μm, the CH operations had significantly greater airborne endotoxin concentration than the FH operations. Endotoxin concentration in the dust mass (endotoxin units per milligram) was significantly greater in the CH operations as compared to the FH operations for all size fractions >1.6 μm. As such, endotoxin in the respirable fraction accounted for 24% of the total endotoxin in the CH operations whereas it accounted for only 11% in the FH operations. There was significantly more dust in all size fractions in the FH operations as compared to the CH poultry operations. CONCLUSIONS There is more endotoxin in the presence of significantly lower dust levels in the respirable particle size fractions in CH poultry operations as compared to the FH poultry operations. This difference in respirable endotoxin may be important in relation to the differential respiratory response experienced by CH and FH poultry operation workers.

[1]  Sara E. Wagner,et al.  Endotoxin Exposure and Inflammation Markers Among Agricultural Workers in Colorado and Nebraska , 2009, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[2]  C. Duchaine,et al.  Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology an Aerobiological Perspective of Dust in Cage-housed and Floor-housed Poultry Operations , 2009 .

[3]  Anne Oppliger,et al.  Exposure to Bioaerosols in Poultry Houses at Different Stages of Fattening; Use of Real-time PCR for Airborne Bacterial Quantification , 2008, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  Marija Vučemilo,et al.  The effect of animal age on air pollutant concentration in a broiler house , 2018 .

[5]  D. Nowak,et al.  Endotoxin concentration in modern animal houses in southern Bavaria. , 2007, Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM.

[6]  J. Lawson,et al.  Respiratory response to endotoxin and dust predicts evidence of inflammatory response in volunteers in a swine barn. , 2006, American journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  S. Reynolds,et al.  Total Dust and Endotoxin in Poultry Operations: Comparison Between Cage and Floor Housing and Respiratory Effects in Workers , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[8]  Stephen J Reynolds,et al.  Respiratory symptoms and lung function in poultry confinement workers in Western Canada. , 2003, Canadian respiratory journal.

[9]  T. Keefe,et al.  Evaluation of airborne dust and endotoxin in corn storage and processing facilities in Colorado. , 2002, International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health.

[10]  S Laitinen,et al.  Evaluation of exposure to airborne bacterial endotoxins and peptidoglycans in selected work environments. , 2001, Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM.

[11]  H. Takai,et al.  Dust levels and control methods in poultry houses. , 2000, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[12]  Patrick T. O'Shaughnessy,et al.  A Comparison of Cascade Impactor Data Reduction Methods , 2000 .

[13]  Braun‐Fahrländer,et al.  Exposure to endotoxin or other bacterial components might protect against the development of atopy , 2000, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[14]  S. Reynolds,et al.  Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: recommendations for exposure limits. , 2000, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[15]  F Golbabaei,et al.  Evaluation of workers' exposure to dust, ammonia and endotoxin in poultry industries at the province of Isfahan, Iran. , 2000, Industrial health.

[16]  L. Palmberg,et al.  Airway responses in naive subjects to exposure in poultry houses: comparison between cage rearing system and alternative rearing system for laying hens. , 1999, American journal of industrial medicine.

[17]  C. Pickering,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of work related respiratory symptoms in workers exposed to organic dusts. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[18]  V. R. Phillips,et al.  Concentrations and emission rates of aerial ammonia, nitrous oxide, methane, carbon dioxide, dust and endotoxin in UK broiler and layer houses. , 1997, British poultry science.

[19]  L. Burmeister,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers. , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[20]  S. Reynolds,et al.  Occupational exposure to organic dusts and gases in the turkey growing industry , 1994 .

[21]  J. Dosman,et al.  Respiratory health status in swine producers relates to endotoxin exposure in the presence of low dust levels. , 1994, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[22]  J. Feddes,et al.  Characterization of airborne dust particles in turkey housing , 1992 .

[23]  J S Boleij,et al.  A study of the relationship between airborne contaminants and environmental factors in Dutch swine confinement buildings. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[24]  E O Terho,et al.  Total concentrations of dust in the air during farm work. , 1987, European journal of respiratory diseases. Supplement.

[25]  R Rylander,et al.  Lung reactions during poultry handling related to dust and bacterial endotoxin levels. , 1984, European journal of respiratory diseases.

[26]  R Rylander,et al.  Airborne bacteria, endotoxin and fungi in dust in poultry and swine confinement buildings. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[27]  R. Rylander,et al.  Pulmonary toxicity of endotoxins: comparison of lipopolysaccharides from various bacterial species , 1982, Infection and immunity.