Phenomics analysis of drought responses in Miscanthus collected from different geographical locations

Miscanthus is a genus of C4 perennial grasses capable of high biomass potential even in temperate regions making it an ideal industrial crop for the renewable supply of energy and chemicals. Yield is strongly linked to water availability, and many environments have limited water supply where otherwise irradiation and temperature are favourable. A total of 47 Miscanthus genotypes, diverse regarding collection site and genotype, were screened in a high‐throughput phenomics facility under drought to generate high‐quality time‐course data for biomass accumulation and water use. Plants were subjected to three treatments: a watered control, mild drought (20% of field capacity) and a severe drought (water completely withdrawn). Daily visual spectrum images were calibrated to harvested biomass and used to assess biomass accumulation over the experiment. Image analyses were used to determine growth and senescence as functions of time and treatment, plant survival and to relate responses to geographical data. An accurate prediction of plant biomass (R2 = 0.92***) was made by comparing actual harvested biomass and projected shoot area. Dynamic responses in senescence between the multiple genotypes under the three treatments demonstrated stay‐green and senescence responses were not associated with species. Microclimate/geographical modelling indicated that origin of genotype was associated with drought tolerance and this helped explain the different responses within the same species. Water‐use efficiency (WUE), the amount of dry biomass accumulated per kg of water, correlated with summer rainfall. Phenomic analysis of drought responses was shown to have the potential to improve the selection of breeding candidates in Miscanthus and has identified interesting Miscanthus genotypes combining high biomass and high WUE for further characterization.

[1]  S. Munné-Bosch,et al.  Drought‐induced senescence is characterized by a loss of antioxidant defences in chloroplasts , 2001 .

[2]  S. Anthony,et al.  Identifying the yield potential of Miscanthus x giganteus: an assessment of the spatial and temporal variability of M. x giganteus biomass productivity across England and Wales , 2004 .

[3]  T. Sang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide characterization of candidate genes for improving the water use efficiency of energy crops grown on semiarid land , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[4]  Dynamics of senescence-related QTLs in potato , 2012, Euphytica.

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[6]  Christina Gloeckner,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics With S , 2003 .

[7]  P. Ciais,et al.  Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003 , 2005, Nature.

[8]  Abraham Blum,et al.  Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress , 2009 .

[9]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[10]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[11]  R. Richards.  Crop improvement for temperate Australia: Future opportunities , 1991 .

[12]  S. Wood.  Modelling and smoothing parameter estimation with multiple quadratic penalties , 2000 .

[13]  A. Blum.  Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential-are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? , 2005 .

[14]  Yuhua Jiao,et al.  Functional approach to high-throughput plant growth analysis , 2013, BMC Systems Biology.

[15]  H. Rennenberg,et al.  The effect of drought on C and N stable isotopes in different fractions of leaves, stems and roots of sensitive and tolerant beech ecotypes. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[16]  E. Mazzucotelli,et al.  Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics , 2008 .

[17]  K. Folta,et al.  Unexpected roles for cryptochrome 2 and phototropin revealed by high-resolution analysis of blue light-mediated hypocotyl growth inhibition. , 2001, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[18]  Ross A Frick,et al.  Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants , 2011, Plant Methods.

[19]  M B Jones,et al.  Comparative responses to water stress in stay-green, rapid- and slow senescing genotypes of the biomass crop, Miscanthus. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[20]  H. Thomas.  Senescence, ageing and death of the whole plant. , 2013, The New phytologist.

[21]  A. Stead,et al.  Defining senescence and death. , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[22]  Avi C. Knecht,et al.  Integrating Image-Based Phenomics and Association Analysis to Dissect the Genetic Architecture of Temporal Salinity Responses in Rice1[OPEN] , 2015, Plant Physiology.

[23]  R. Tuberosa.  Phenotyping for drought tolerance of crops in the genomics era , 2012, Front. Physio..

[24]  S. Christensen,et al.  Plant phenomics and the need for physiological phenotyping across scales to narrow the genotype-to-phenotype knowledge gap. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[25]  N. Alexandrov,et al.  High Resolution Genetic Mapping by Genome Sequencing Reveals Genome Duplication and Tetraploid Genetic Structure of the Diploid Miscanthus sinensis , 2012, PloS one.

[26]  A. Greenberg,et al.  Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[27]  François Tardieu,et al.  Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[28]  L. Mur,et al.  Physiological and growth responses to water deficit in the bioenergy crop Miscanthus x giganteus , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[29]  Daniel Felten,et al.  Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany , 2013 .

[30]  M. Cooper,et al.  Modeling biomass accumulation in maize kernels , 2013 .

[31]  M. Chase,et al.  Characterization of a genetic resource collection for Miscanthus (Saccharinae, Andropogoneae, Poaceae) using AFLP and ISSR PCR. , 2002, Annals of botany.

[32]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Water Use Efficiency and Biomass Partitioning of Three Different Miscanthus Genotypes with Limited and Unlimited Water Supply , 2000 .

[33]  M. Tester,et al.  Image-based phenotyping for non-destructive screening of different salinity tolerance traits in rice , 2014, Rice.

[34]  Rodger P. White,et al.  Sequestration of C in soils under Miscanthus can be marginal and is affected by genotype-specific root distribution , 2015 .

[35]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  Ae Hall,et al.  Drought and Pot Size Effects on Transpiration Efficiency and Carbon Isotope Discrimination of Cowpea Accessions and Hybrids , 1994 .

[37]  Keith A. Smith,et al.  N 2 O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels , 2007 .

[38]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[39]  R. Hunt.  Plant Growth Analysis: Second Derivatives and Compounded Second Derivatives of Splined Plant Growth Curves , 1982 .

[40]  R. Furbank,et al.  C4 rice: a challenge for plant phenomics. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[41]  I. Linde-Laursen,et al.  Cytogenetic Analysis of Miscanthus‘Giganteus’, an Interspecific Hybrid , 2004 .

[42]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Accelerating the domestication of a bioenergy crop: identifying and modelling morphological targets for sustainable yield increase in Miscanthus , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[43]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Utilization of a high-throughput shoot imaging system to examine the dynamic phenotypic responses of a C4 cereal crop plant to nitrogen and water deficiency over time , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[44]  S. Wood.  Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models , 2011 .

[45]  Physiological requirements for wheat ideotypes in response to drought threat , 2015, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum.

[46]  M. Stephens,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles , 2007, Molecular ecology notes.

[47]  A. Hastings,et al.  The development of MISCANFOR, a new Miscanthus crop growth model: towards more robust yield predictions under different climatic and soil conditions , 2009 .

[48]  F. J. Richards.  A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use , 1959 .

[49]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Phenotypic Variation in Senescence in Miscanthus: Towards Optimising Biomass Quality and Quantity , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[50]  S. Wood.  Stable and Efficient Multiple Smoothing Parameter Estimation for Generalized Additive Models , 2004 .

[51]  P. Mullineaux,et al.  Improving water use in crop production , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  A. Hastings,et al.  Land use change from C3 grassland to C4 Miscanthus: effects on soil carbon content and estimated mitigation benefit after six years , 2014 .

[53]  A. Mäkelä,et al.  Optimal Control of Gas Exchange during Drought: Theoretical Analysis , 1996 .

[54]  Drought and drought tolerance , 1996 .

[55]  Iain S. Donnison,et al.  Environmental costs and benefits of growing Miscanthus for bioenergy in the UK , 2015, Global change biology. Bioenergy.

[56]  Tracy Lawson,et al.  Phenotyping in Plants. Preface. , 2015, Journal of experimental botany.

[57]  J. Boyer.  Plant Productivity and Environment , 1982, Science.

[58]  C. Tonelli,et al.  Survival and growth of Arabidopsis plants given limited water are not equal , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[59]  Shane A. Richards,et al.  Dealing with overdispersed count data in applied ecology , 2007 .

[60]  F. Berninger,et al.  Drought responses of Eucalyptus microtheca provenances depend on seasonality of rainfall in their place of origin , 2000 .

[61]  M. Westgate,et al.  Source/sink ratio and the relationship between maximum water content, maximum volume, and final dry weight of maize kernels , 2007 .

[62]  C. Klukas,et al.  Dissecting the Phenotypic Components of Crop Plant Growth and Drought Responses Based on High-Throughput Image Analysis[W][OPEN] , 2014, Plant Cell.

[63]  S. Munné-Bosch,et al.  Do perennials really senesce? , 2008, Trends in plant science.

[64]  Roberto Tuberosa,et al.  Translational research impacting on crop productivity in drought-prone environments. , 2008, Current opinion in plant biology.

[65]  Lindsay A. Turnbull,et al.  A new method for measuring relative growth rate can uncover the costs of defensive compounds in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[66]  A. Condon,et al.  Improving Intrinsic Water-Use Efficiency and Crop Yield. , 2002, Crop science.

[67]  M. Tester,et al.  High-throughput shoot imaging to study drought responses. , 2010, Journal of experimental botany.

[68]  S. Cosentino,et al.  Effects of soil water content and nitrogen supply on the productivity of Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deu. in a Mediterranean environment , 2007 .

[69]  Gordon G. Allison,et al.  Contrasting geographic patterns of genetic variation for molecular markers vs. phenotypic traits in the energy grass Miscanthus sinensis , 2013 .

[70]  J. Weng.  Photosynthesis of different ecotypes of Miscanthus spp. as affected by water stress , 1993 .

[71]  H. Zub,et al.  Agronomic and physiological performances of different species of Miscanthus, a major energy crop. A review , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[72]  J. Passioura.  Drought and drought tolerance , 1996, Plant Growth Regulation.

[73]  Marta Dondini,et al.  The potential of Miscanthus to sequester carbon in soils: comparing field measurements in Carlow, Ireland to model predictions , 2009 .

[74]  G. Farquhar,et al.  13C discrimination during CO2 assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere , 1994, Oecologia.

[75]  A. Hastings,et al.  Potential of Miscanthus grasses to provide energy and hence reduce greenhouse gas emissions , 2008, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[76]  M. Tester,et al.  High-Throughput Phenotyping to Detect Drought Tolerance QTL in Wild Barley Introgression Lines , 2014, PloS one.

[77]  G. F. Arkin,et al.  Sorghum root growth and water-use as affected by water supply and growth duration , 1984 .

[78]  I. T. Parsons,et al.  Plant Growth Analysis: a Program for the Fitting of Lengthy Series of Data by the Method of B-splines , 1981 .

[79]  D. R. Causton,et al.  The Biometry of Plant Growth , 1982 .

[80]  Analysis of soil moisture variations in an irrigated orchard root zone , 2001, Plant and Soil.

[81]  Kevin R. Fingerman,et al.  Miscanthus biomass productivity within US croplands and its potential impact on soil organic carbon , 2013 .

[82]  T. Voigt,et al.  Miscanthus × giganteus productivity: the effects of management in different environments , 2012 .

[83]  G. Evans,et al.  The quantitative analysis of plant growth , 1972 .

[84]  Carl J. Bernacchi,et al.  A comparison of canopy evapotranspiration for maize and two perennial grasses identified as potential bioenergy crops , 2010 .

[85]  I. Donnison,et al.  Variation in canopy duration in the perennial biofuel crop Miscanthus reveals complex associations with yield , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[86]  Hato Schmeiser,et al.  THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH , 2018, Robustness Theory and Application.