Systemic eco-efficiency assessment of meso-level water use systems

Eco-efficiency has recently become an important concept of environmental decision making, serving as a policy objective and, if linked with resource efficiency, can be a measure of progress towards sustainability. The need for improving eco-efficiency leads to the challenge of identifying the most promising alternative solutions which improve both the economic and the environmental performance of a given system (“eco-innovations”). A methodological framework for the eco-efficiency assessment of a water use system at the meso level has been developed in the context of the EcoWater research project and consists of four distinct steps. The first step leads to a clear, transparent mapping of the system at hand and the respective value chain, while the second step provides the means to assess its eco-efficiency, following a life-cycle oriented approach using the midpoint impact categories. An important novelty is the distribution of economic costs/benefits and environmental pressures over different stages and stakeholders in the value chain. The third step includes the selection of innovative technologies, which are assessed in the last step and combined with mid-term scenarios in order to determine the feasibility of their implementation. The proposed methodological framework has been applied to eight alternative water use systems, revealing all their environmental weaknesses and identifying potential opportunities for eco-efficiency improvement. At the same time, through the systemic approach all the involved actors are urged to cooperate in order to (a) propose and build innovative technological solutions that will improve the overall eco-efficiency of the system; and (b) make suggestions on the necessary policy framework that will facilitate and promote their uptake. This ensures that upstream decisions in the value chain are coordinated with downstream activities and all potential synergies are identified, leading to the creation of “meso-level closed resource loops” and thus the promotion of a circular economy.

[1]  Marileena Koskela,et al.  Measuring eco-efficiency in the Finnish forest industry using public data , 2015 .

[2]  J. Seppälä,et al.  Regional eco-efficiency indicators – a participatory approach , 2006 .

[3]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Eco‐efficiency and Its xsTerminology , 2005 .

[4]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  Eco‐efficiency in corporate budgeting , 2001 .

[5]  Ottar Michelsen,et al.  Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: a case study of furniture production. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Roland Clift,et al.  Consider a Spherical Man - A Simple Model to Include Human Excretion in Life Cycle Assessment of Food Products , 2008 .

[7]  G. Gereffi,et al.  The governance of global value chains , 2005 .

[8]  H. Schmitz,et al.  Governance and Upgrading: Linking Industrial Cluster and Global Value Chain Research , 2000 .

[9]  Matti Melanen,et al.  The eco‐efficiency of regions – case Kymenlaakso: ECOREG project 2002‐2004 , 2004 .

[10]  Humberto Heluane,et al.  Water and wastewater eco-efficiency indicators for the sugar cane industry , 2009 .

[11]  J. C. Jansen Resource Efficiency: What does it mean and why is it relevant? , 2013 .

[12]  W. Poganietz,et al.  Economic-environmental monitoring indicators for European countries: A disaggregated sector-based approach for monitoring eco-efficiency , 2011 .

[13]  A. Chapagain,et al.  Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: Part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways , 2009 .

[14]  Jason Potts,et al.  Micro-meso-macro , 2004 .

[15]  Roland Clift,et al.  Consider a Spherical Man , 2008 .

[16]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Improving eco-efficiency in the steel industry: The ArcelorMittal Gent case. , 2010 .

[17]  Andreas Kicherer,et al.  Eco‐efficiency: inside BASF and beyond , 2005 .

[18]  J. Guinée Handbook on life cycle assessment — operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[19]  Ian Vázquez-Rowe,et al.  Eco-efficiency assessment of the Peruvian anchoveta steel and wooden fleets using the LCA+DEA framework , 2014 .

[20]  Les Levidow,et al.  Process eco-innovation: assessing meso-level eco-efficiency in industrial water-service systems , 2016 .

[21]  Cross-comparison of Case-study Outcomes , 2015 .

[22]  Bing Zhu,et al.  A Material Flow Analysis (MFA)-based potential analysis of eco-efficiency indicators of China's cement and cement-based materials industry , 2016 .

[23]  Ivan Muoz,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Water Supply Plans in Mediterranean Spain , 2010 .

[24]  Murray Patterson,et al.  Aggregate eco-efficiency indices for New Zealand--a principal components analysis. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.