The process capability model for governance of the Election Organizer Ethics Court system

The capability level assesment for governance of the Election Organizer Ethics Court Information System [SIPEPP] is necessary to ensure strategic planning allignment, value delivery, risk management, resources management and performance measurement. SIPEPP implementation has special problems in optimizing human resources and weak supervision management, so it is important to asess capability levels to provide solutions to these problems. The purpose of this paper is to assess the current and expected capability level conditions, gap analysis and recommendations for SIPEPP good governance. This research method uses the Process Assessment Model (PAM) from Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT 5) which consists of stages of initiation, planning the assessment, briefing, data collection, data validation, process attribute level, and result and recommendation. The results of this study indicate the level of optimization of resources and performance monitoring processes are level 2 (Managed Process) which means that the process has been recorded, measured and in accordance with the objectives. The process of managing human resources, assets and operations are at level 1 (Performed Process), meaning that both processes have been applied to SIPEPP governance. Recommendations related human resources are the selection of appropriate human resources by involving management, while related assets require a priority list of implementation systems, and related supervision requires detailed monitoring schedules. This study result can be taken into consideration for improving good governance of SIPEPP implementation.

[1]  W. V. Grembergen,et al.  Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms for IT Governance , 2004 .

[2]  Maurício Gregianin Testa,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Culture on IT Governance: Perception of a Group of IT Managers from Latin American Companies , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Maturity models in business process management , 2012, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[4]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers , 2015, MIS Q..

[5]  Mohamad Shanudin Zakaria,et al.  Developing factors for effective IT governance mechanism , 2015, 2015 9th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC).

[6]  Shengnan Han,et al.  The Influence of Organizational Culture on IT Governance Performance: Case of the IT Department in a Large Swedish Company , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[7]  C. McDonald,et al.  IT Governance in Public and Private Sector Organisations: Examining the Differences and Defining Future Research Directions , 2007, ACIS.

[8]  Paul H. Barnes,et al.  Optimising COBIT 5 for IT governance : examples from the public sector , 2012 .

[9]  Alex Pasquini,et al.  COBIT 5 and the Process Capability Model. Improvements Provided for IT Governance Process , 2013 .

[10]  Shengnan Han,et al.  The Influence of Culture on IT Governance: A Literature Review , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Narayanan Kulathuramaiyer,et al.  An IT governance framework for achieving the development of academic programme in higher institutions: A case of Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) , 2014, The 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for The Muslim World (ICT4M).

[12]  Marcus Vinicius Borela De Castro,et al.  A Metric of Software Size as a Tool for IT Governance , 2013, SBES.

[13]  Jörg Becker,et al.  Developing Maturity Models for IT Management , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[14]  Steven De Haes,et al.  COBIT 5 and Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Building Blocks and Research Opportunities , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Mike Gregory,et al.  The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability , 2002, IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[16]  Kexin Zhao,et al.  Impact of IT Governance and IT Capability on Firm Performance , 2016, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo,et al.  Planning and Implementing IT Governance in Brazilian Public Organizations , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo,et al.  Implementation of information technology (IT) governance through IT strategic planning , 2012 .

[19]  Syopiansyah Jaya Putra,et al.  Usulan model tata kelola teknologi informasi pada domain plan and organise dengan menggunakan framework cobit 4.1 , 2014 .