Magnocellular Deficit in Dyslexia: A Preliminary Analysis of Possible Patternsof Visual Field Deficit Tested with Frequency Doubling Illusion

Purpose: To identify distinguishing visual field (VF) deficiencies in dyslexic children by exploring responses to spatial frequency doubling illusions, characteristically involving the magnocellular visual pathway. Methods: Eighteen dyslexic subjects and nine controls [mean age 8.4 ± 1.4 years (range, 7-13 years)] were consecutively enrolled and underwent VF examination on a Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) Visual Field Instrument. Among the 19 locations of the right eye (RE) and left eye (LE) VFs, 7 topographic patterns were identified: central (CE), superior-temporal (ST), and outer superior-nasal (OSN), inner superior-nasal (ISN), inner inferior-nasal (IIN), outer inferior-nasal (OIN), inferiortemporal (IT). The default settings included measurements of both eyes separately at all 19 VF locations, exploring the central 30-degree radius of eccentricity. For each pattern indicated the thresholds of contiguous 5 point clusters of the VF in both eyes were averaged: the 7 threshold averages obtained were compared for each eye between the control and dyslexic groups. Results: For RE and LE there was non-statistically significant difference between control and affected cases for all patterns except for CE, IIN, IT patterns in the left eye (P<0.05). The two groups were comparable for loss of fixation, false positive error, and false negative error. These data indicate that the dyslexic reader's left eye presents less sensitivity to FD illusions in almost all inferior retinal hemifield. Conclusion: Dyslexics analyzed using FD illusions may be less sensitive in specific sections of the VF. This topographic failure may help to confirm that a deficit in the magnocellular visual pathway is correlated to reading difficulties.

[1]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Lateralization of the Human Mirror Neuron System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Ibbotson,et al.  The effects of adaptation to visual stimuli on the velocity of subsequent ocular following responses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  M. Ibbotson,et al.  Human ocular following responses are plastic: evidence for control by temporal frequency-dependent cortical adaptation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  J. Stein,et al.  The magnocellular theory of developmental dyslexia. , 2001, Dyslexia.

[5]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Responses of primate retinal ganglion cells to perimetric stimuli. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  C. Wood,et al.  Sensitivity to visual and auditory stimuli in children with developmental dyslexia. , 2008, Dyslexia.

[7]  F. Previc.  Origins and Implications of Frequency‐Doubling in the Visual Evoked Potential , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[8]  Alison R. Davis,et al.  Differential changes of magnocellular and parvocellular visual function in early- and late-onset strabismic amblyopia. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  S. Sutherland.  Eye, brain and vision , 1993, Nature.

[10]  J. B. Demb,et al.  Normal planum temporale asymmetry in dyslexics with a magnocellular pathway deficit. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[11]  K. Pammer,et al.  Isolating the M(y)-cell response in dyslexia using the spatial frequency doubling illusion , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  L. Craighero,et al.  Peripheral oculomotor palsy affects orienting of visuospatial attention , 2001, Neuroreport.

[13]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  A. Facoetti,et al.  The spatial distribution of visual attention in developmental dyslexia , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  A. Metha,et al.  Spatial structure of the frequency doubling illusion , 2007, Vision Research.

[17]  Geoffrey W Stuart,et al.  Can contrast sensitivity functions in dyslexia be explained by inattention rather than a magnocellular deficit? , 2001, Vision Research.

[18]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Perceived Spatial Frequency of Sinusoidal Gratings , 2008, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.