Modulation of the Foreign Body Reaction for Implants in the Subcutaneous Space: Microdialysis Probes as Localized Drug Delivery/Sampling Devices

Modulation of the foreign body reaction is considered to be an important step toward creation of implanted sensors with reliable long-term performance. In this work, microdialysis probes were implanted into the subcutaneous space of Sprague-Dawley rats. The probe performance was evaluated by comparing collected endogenous glucose concentrations with internal standard calibration (2-deoxyglucose, antipyrine, and vitamin B12). Probes were tested until failure, which for this work was defined as loss of fluid flow. In order to determine the effect of fbrous capsule formation on probe function, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/CC chemokine ligand 2 (MCP-1/CCL2) was delivered locally via the probe to increase capsule thickness and dexamethasone 21-phosphate was delivered to reduce capsule thickness. Probes delivering MCP-1 had a capsule that was twice the thickness (500–600 μm) of control probes (200–225 μm) and typically failed 2 days earlier than control probes. Probes delivering dexamethasone 21-phosphate had more fragile capsules and the probes typically failed 2 days later than controls. Unexpectedly, extraction efficiency and collected glucose concentrations exhibited minor differences between groups. This is an interesting result in that the foreign body capsule formation was related to the duration of probe function but did not consistently relate to probe calibration.

[1]  P F Morrison,et al.  Steady-state theory for quantitative microdialysis of solutes and water in vivo and in vitro. , 1990, Life sciences.

[2]  Diffusion of [3H]Dexamethasone in Rat Subcutaneous Slices after Injection Measured by Digital Autoradiography , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[3]  P. Vonk,et al.  Microdialysis of Glucose in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue up to 3 Weeks in Healthy Volunteers , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[4]  S. Amini,et al.  Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. , 2009, Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research.

[5]  Francis Moussy,et al.  An investigation of long-term performance of minimally invasive glucose biosensors. , 2007, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[6]  J. B. Justice,et al.  Microdialysis of dopamine interpreted with quantitative model incorporating probe implantation trauma , 2003, Journal of neurochemistry.

[7]  N. Wisniewski,et al.  Decreased analyte transport through implanted membranes: differentiation of biofouling from tissue effects. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  P Vadgama Biosensors in the Body. Continuous In Vivo Monitoring , 1998 .

[9]  P. Garris Advancing neurochemical monitoring , 2010, Nature Methods.

[10]  W Kenneth Ward,et al.  A review of the foreign-body response to subcutaneously-implanted devices: the role of macrophages and cytokines in biofouling and fibrosis. , 2008, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[11]  J. Stenken,et al.  Long-term calibration considerations during subcutaneous microdialysis sampling in mobile rats. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[12]  W M Reichert,et al.  Vascular endothelial growth factor and dexamethasone release from nonfouling sensor coatings affect the foreign body response. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[13]  G. Rao,et al.  Histologic evaluation of the inflammatory response around implanted hollow fiber membranes. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  G. Reach,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring: physiological and technological challenges. , 2008, Current diabetes reviews.

[15]  Francis Moussy,et al.  A novel porous collagen scaffold around an implantable biosensor for improving biocompatibility. II. Long-term in vitro/in vivo sensitivity characteristics of sensors with NDGA- or GA-crosslinked collagen scaffolds. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[16]  William M Reichert,et al.  Modeling the relative impact of capsular tissue effects on implanted glucose sensor time lag and signal attenuation , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[17]  S. Woodward How Fibroblasts and Giant Cells Encapsulate Implants: Considerations in Design of Glucose Sensors , 1982, Diabetes Care.

[18]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Quantitative in vivo cytokine analysis at synthetic biomaterial implant sites. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  G. Coté,et al.  Development of a self-cleaning sensor membrane for implantable biosensors. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[20]  K. Sakai,et al.  An improvement on the method of determining the solute permeability of hollow-fiber dialysis membranes photometrically using optical fibers and comparison of the method with ordinary techniques , 1994 .

[21]  J. Santerre,et al.  Polycarbonate-urethane hard segment type influences esterase substrate specificity for human-macrophage-mediated biodegradation , 2005, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[22]  H. Möllmann,et al.  HPLC determination of glucocorticoid alcohols, their phosphates and hydrocortisone in aqueous solutions and biological fluids. , 1986, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.

[23]  G. Karakiulakis,et al.  Corticosteroids inhibit the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in human vascular smooth muscle cells. , 1998, European journal of pharmacology.

[24]  B. Sidell,et al.  A method for the determination of diffusion coefficients for small molecules in aqueous solution. , 1987, Analytical biochemistry.

[25]  K. L. Snyder,et al.  Diffusion and calibration properties of microdialysis sampling membranes in biological media. , 2001, The Analyst.

[26]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  In vivo Electrochemistry: What Can We Learn about Living Systems? , 2008 .

[27]  E. M. Renkin,et al.  FILTRATION, DIFFUSION, AND MOLECULAR SIEVING THROUGH POROUS CELLULOSE MEMBRANES , 1954, The Journal of general physiology.

[28]  N Wisniewski,et al.  Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane biofouling , 2000, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry.

[29]  Kevin H. Hazen,et al.  Comparison of glucose concentration in interstitial fluid, and capillary and venous blood during rapid changes in blood glucose levels. , 2001, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[30]  W Kenneth Ward,et al.  Controlled release of dexamethasone from subcutaneously-implanted biosensors in pigs: localized anti-inflammatory benefit without systemic effects. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[31]  Udo Hoss,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring in subcutaneous tissue using factory-calibrated sensors: a pilot study. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[32]  David D. Cunningham,et al.  In Vivo Glucose Sensing , 2009 .

[33]  J. Brauker,et al.  Continuous glucose sensing: future technology developments. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[34]  K. Wientjes,et al.  A model for transport of glucose in adipose tissue to a microdialysis probe. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[35]  F Moussy,et al.  Dexamethasone/PLGA microspheres for continuous delivery of an anti-inflammatory drug for implantable medical devices. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[36]  M. Schoenfisch,et al.  Reducing Implant-Related Infections: Active Release Strategies , 2006 .

[37]  R. Andrew Byrd,et al.  ASSOCIATION OF BIOMOLECULAR SYSTEMS VIA PULSED FIELD GRADIENT NMR SELF-DIFFUSION MEASUREMENTS , 1995 .

[38]  J. Edelman,et al.  Corticosteroids inhibit VEGF-induced vascular leakage in a rabbit model of blood-retinal and blood-aqueous barrier breakdown. , 2004, Experimental eye research.

[39]  J. Bancroft,et al.  Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques , 1990 .

[40]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Chronic inflammatory responses to microgel-based implant coatings. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[41]  C. Highley,et al.  Anti-inflammatory function of an in situ cross-linkable conjugate hydrogel of hyaluronic acid and dexamethasone. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[42]  Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos,et al.  Biomaterials/Tissue Interactions: Possible Solutions to Overcome Foreign Body Response , 2010, The AAPS Journal.

[43]  U. Ungerstedt,et al.  Analyte flux through chronically implanted subcutaneous polyamide membranes differs in humans and rats. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[44]  W M Reichert,et al.  Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. III. Effective tissue response times. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[45]  U. Ungerstedt,et al.  Analyte Flux at a Biomaterial-Tissue Interface over Time: Implications for Sensors for Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[46]  K. Jarnagin,et al.  Monomeric Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1) Binds and Activates the MCP-1 Receptor CCR2B* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Pradyot Nandi,et al.  Recent trends in microdialysis sampling integrated with conventional and microanalytical systems for monitoring biological events: a review. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[48]  G. S. Wilson,et al.  Biosensors for real-time in vivo measurements. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[49]  P. Maloney,et al.  In vivo and in vitro effects of dexamethasone on leukocyte migration in the rat adjuvant arthritis model , 1982, Inflammation.

[50]  N. Gretz,et al.  Tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of glucose-oxidase-based glucose sensors in rats. , 2007, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[51]  R. Auerbach,et al.  Angiogenesis inhibition: a review. , 1994, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[52]  James M. Anderson,et al.  Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.