On theoretical and realizable ideal conditions in psychophysics: Magnitude and category scales and their relation

By spacing 10 stimuli (white noise) between 40 and 110 dB according to two criteria [equal response ambiguity (ERA) and equal discriminability (ED)], an attempt was made to construct an “ideal” case for magnitude estimation and category rating. The “ideal” case is defined by linear and constant Weber functions (SDs as a function of scale values) for the two scales, respectively. Altogether, three group and two individual magnitude and category rating experiments were run with these two spacings. It was found that the ERA spacing approximated the ideal case well for both Weber functions and the ED spacing only for the Weber function of the category scale. The general psychophysical differential equation that relates scale values and Weber functions for the two scales allowed good prediction of the category scales from the magnitude scales and the Weber functions. The data suggested a distinction between phenotypic (empirical) and genotypic Weber functions, analogous to “real” and “ideal” cases in physics.

[1]  W. Siegel,et al.  Absolute Judgment and Paired-Associate Learning: Kissing Cousins or Identical Twins?. , 1972 .

[2]  J. C. Stevens.  Stimulus spacing and the judgment of loudness. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  William Siegel,et al.  Memory effects in the method of absolute judgment. , 1972 .

[4]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[5]  H. Eisler.  A GENERAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION IN PSYCHO‐PHYSICS: DERIVATION AND EMPIRICAL TEST , 1963 .

[6]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[7]  Hannes Eisler,et al.  ON PSYCHOPHYSICS IN GENERAL AND THE GENERAL PSYCHOPHYSICAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION IN PARTICULAR , 1965 .

[8]  Hannes Eisler,et al.  SIMILARITY IN THE CONTINUUM OF HEAVINESS WITH SOME METHODOLOGICAL AND THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1960 .

[9]  W. R. Garner,et al.  The amount of information in absolute judgments. , 1951 .

[10]  H. Eisler.  HOW PROTHETIC IS THE CONTINUUM OF SMELL?: A further comment on the relation between magnitude and category scales , 1963 .

[11]  H. Eisler,et al.  ON THE PROBLEM OF HYSTERESIS IN PSYCHOPHYSICS. , 1963 .

[12]  Hannes Eisler,et al.  ON THE PROBLEM OF CATEGORY SCALES IN PSYCHOPHYSICS , 1962 .

[13]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  Hannes Eisler,et al.  Magnitude scales, category scales, and Fechnerian integration. , 1963 .

[15]  L. Tucker,et al.  Psychological models for relating discrimination and magnitude estimation scales. , 1961, Psychological review.

[16]  W. R. Garner.  Applications of Information Theory to Psychology , 1959 .

[17]  H Eisler,et al.  The connection between magnitude and discrimination scales and direct and indirect scaling methods , 1965, Psychometrika.

[18]  H. Eisler.  EMPIRICAL TEST OF A MODEL RELATING MAGNITUDE AND CATEGORY SCALES , 1962 .