Predicting personality traits from resting-state fMRI

Personality neuroscience aims to find associations between brain measures and personality traits. Findings to date have been severely limited by a number of factors, including small sample size and omission of out-of-sample prediction. We capitalized on the recent availability of a large database, together with the emergence of specific criteria for best practices in neuroimaging studies of individual differences. We analyzed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 867 young healthy adults in the Human Connectome Project (HCP) database. We attempted to predict personality traits from the "Big Five", as assessed with the NEO-FFI test, using individual functional connectivity matrices. After regressing out potential confounds such as age, sex, and IQ, we used a cross-validated framework, together with test-retest replication, to quantify how well the neuroimaging data could predict each of the five personality factors, as well as two superordinate factors ("α" and "β"). To obtain a more comprehensive set of findings, we tested three different preprocessing pipelines for the fMRI data, two brain parcellation schemes, and two different linear models for prediction. Across all 24 results (test/retest; 3 processing pipelines; 2 parcellation schemes; 2 models) we found no consistent evidence for predictability for any of the five personality traits with the exception of Openness, and the superordinate β factor ("personal growth/ plasticity"). As a benchmark, we showed that we could replicate prior reports of predicting IQ from the same dataset. Best predictions in all cases were around r=0.2, thus only accounting for about 4% of the variance. We conclude with a discussion of the potential for predicting personality from neuroimaging data and make specific recommendations for the field.

[1]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Amygdalar and hippocampal substrates of anxious temperament differ in their heritability , 2010, Nature.

[3]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Data Quality Influences Observed Links Between Functional Connectivity and Behavior , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  C. DeYoung Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[6]  M McGue,et al.  Common SNPs explain some of the variation in the personality dimensions of neuroticism and extraversion , 2012, Translational Psychiatry.

[7]  Hong Chen,et al.  Extraversion is encoded by scale-free dynamics of default mode network , 2013, NeuroImage.

[8]  Michael Erb,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry studies of personality: Issue of statistical model specification—effect of nuisance covariates , 2011, NeuroImage.

[9]  N. Maurits,et al.  A Brain-Wide Study of Age-Related Changes in Functional Connectivity. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  James Jaccard,et al.  Predicting social behavior from personality traits , 1974 .

[11]  Tal Yarkoni,et al.  Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  J. O'Gorman,et al.  Effects of faking set on validity of the NEO-FFI , 1997 .

[13]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[14]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[15]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Brain network dynamics are hierarchically organized in time , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Yutaka Ono,et al.  Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  I. Deary,et al.  The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E , 2000 .

[18]  M. Folstein,et al.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. , 1993, JAMA.

[19]  P. Costa,et al.  Clinical Assessment Can Benefit From Recent Advances In Personality Psychology , 1986 .

[20]  Sampo V. Paunonen,et al.  Big Five personality factors and the prediction of behavior: A multitrait–multimethod approach , 2008 .

[21]  Boris Egloff,et al.  Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Ken Kelley,et al.  Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty , 2017, Psychological science.

[23]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[24]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Orbitofrontal thickness, retention of fear extinction, and extraversion , 2005, Neuroreport.

[25]  Anders M. Fjell,et al.  Neuronal correlates of the five factor model (FFM) of human personality: Multimodal imaging in a large healthy sample , 2013, NeuroImage.

[26]  P. Vernon,et al.  Heritability of the big five personality dimensions and their facets: a twin study. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[27]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  A comparison between voxel-based cortical thickness and voxel-based morphometry in normal aging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[28]  C. Phillips,et al.  NeuroImage: Clinical , 2022 .

[29]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  P-Curve: A Key to the File Drawer , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  T. Yarkoni Neurobiological substrates of personality: A critical overview. , 2015 .

[31]  Håkon Grydeland,et al.  Linking an anxiety-related personality trait to brain white matter microstructure: diffusion tensor imaging and harm avoidance. , 2011, Archives of general psychiatry.

[32]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Interpreting the BOLD signal. , 2004, Annual review of physiology.

[33]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  The relationship between spatial configuration and functional connectivity of brain regions , 2017, bioRxiv.

[34]  Robin W. Wilkins,et al.  Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  T. Yarkoni,et al.  Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning , 2017, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[36]  R. Michael Furr,et al.  Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science , 2009 .

[37]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The human connectome: Origins and challenges , 2013, NeuroImage.

[38]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Understanding and using the implicit association test: V. measuring semantic aspects of trait self‐concepts , 2008 .

[39]  A. Ramasamy,et al.  Widespread sex differences in gene expression and splicing in the adult human brain , 2013, Nature Communications.

[40]  Yasuyuki Taki,et al.  The association between resting functional connectivity and creativity. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  Steen Moeller,et al.  The Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Mathias Allemand,et al.  Age differences in five personality domains across the life span. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[43]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Prediction of Individual Brain Maturity Using fMRI , 2010, Science.

[44]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  How to produce personality neuroscience research with high statistical power and low additional cost , 2013, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  Randy L. Buckner,et al.  Individual Differences in Amygdala-Medial Prefrontal Anatomy Link Negative Affect, Impaired Social Functioning, and Polygenic Depression Risk , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Linda Geerligs,et al.  State and Trait Components of Functional Connectivity: Individual Differences Vary with Mental State , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Daniel Danner,et al.  The association between personality and cognitive ability: Going beyond simple effects , 2016 .

[48]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Functional resting-state connectivity of the human motor network: Differences between right- and left-handers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[49]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[50]  D. Ones,et al.  Measurement Error in “Big Five Factors” Personality Assessment: Reliability Generalization across Studies and Measures , 2000 .

[51]  R. Power,et al.  Heritability estimates of the Big Five personality traits based on common genetic variants , 2015, Translational Psychiatry.

[52]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Using Support Vector Machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: A critical review , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[54]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Long-term neural and physiological phenotyping of a single human , 2015, Nature Communications.

[55]  Daniele Marinazzo,et al.  Left and Right Amygdala - Mediofrontal Cortical Functional Connectivity Is Differentially Modulated by Harm Avoidance , 2014, PloS one.

[56]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality Dimensions in Nonhuman Animals , 1999 .

[57]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[58]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Methods to detect, characterize, and remove motion artifact in resting state fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[59]  B. Roberts,et al.  The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of extraversion and neuroticism. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  Benjamin Thyreau,et al.  A longitudinal study of the relationship between personality traits and the annual rate of volume changes in regional gray matter in healthy adults , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[62]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Neuroticism and extraversion are associated with amygdala resting-state functional connectivity , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[63]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[64]  A. Caspi,et al.  The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes , 2007, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[65]  César Caballero-Gaudes,et al.  Methods for cleaning the BOLD fMRI signal , 2016, NeuroImage.

[66]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  The Description of Personality: Principles and Findings in a Factor Analysis , 1945 .

[67]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Automatic denoising of functional MRI data: Combining independent component analysis and hierarchical fusion of classifiers , 2014, NeuroImage.

[68]  P. Whalen,et al.  The Structural Integrity of an Amygdala–Prefrontal Pathway Predicts Trait Anxiety , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  John P. Donnelly,et al.  Big Five or Big Two? Superordinate factors in the NEO Five Factor Inventory and the Antisocial Personality Questionnaire , 2004 .

[70]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[72]  Dimitris Samaras,et al.  Deriving reproducible biomarkers from multi-site resting-state data: An Autism-based example , 2016, NeuroImage.

[73]  Woei-Chyn Chu,et al.  The Big Five of Personality and structural imaging revisited: a VBM – DARTEL study , 2013, Neuroreport.

[74]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[75]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[76]  Mary Beth Nebel,et al.  Reduction of motion-related artifacts in resting state fMRI using aCompCor , 2014, NeuroImage.

[77]  Peter J. Gianaros,et al.  Resting state functional connectivity within the cingulate cortex jointly predicts agreeableness and stressor-evoked cardiovascular reactivity , 2011, NeuroImage.

[78]  Samuel D Gosling,et al.  Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[79]  José M. Soares,et al.  Brain correlates of pro-social personality traits: a voxel-based morphometry study , 2013, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[80]  Toniann Pitassi,et al.  The reusable holdout: Preserving validity in adaptive data analysis , 2015, Science.

[81]  Naomi R. Wray,et al.  A genome-wide association study of Cloninger's temperament scales: Implications for the evolutionary genetics of personality , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[82]  Michael S. Gazzaniga,et al.  Why share data? Lessons learned from the fMRIDC , 2013, NeuroImage.

[83]  J. Uher Developing “Personality” Taxonomies: Metatheoretical and Methodological Rationales Underlying Selection Approaches, Methods of Data Generation and Reduction Principles , 2015, Integrative psychological & behavioral science.

[84]  P. Costa,et al.  Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[85]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup , 2013, NeuroImage.

[86]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[87]  S. Gosling,et al.  Personality in its natural habitat: manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[88]  P. Costa,et al.  Domains and facets: hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO personality inventory. , 1995, Journal of personality assessment.

[89]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[90]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[91]  David A. Winkler,et al.  Beware of R2: Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[92]  A. Feingold,et al.  Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[93]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[94]  S. Gosling,et al.  Journal of , 1993 .

[95]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[96]  Felix D. Schönbrodt,et al.  At what sample size do correlations stabilize , 2013 .

[97]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains , 2017, Neuron.

[98]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[99]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[100]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Sharing the wealth: Neuroimaging data repositories , 2016, NeuroImage.

[101]  J. Desmond,et al.  An fMRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[102]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  Tests for departure from normality. Empirical results for the distributions of b2 and √b1 , 1973 .

[103]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[104]  Neuroskeptic The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[105]  J. Paruelo,et al.  How to evaluate models : Observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? , 2008 .

[106]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[107]  Paola Galdi,et al.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data , 2018 .

[108]  Jonathan S. Adelstein,et al.  Personality Is Reflected in the Brain's Intrinsic Functional Architecture , 2011, PloS one.

[109]  Karim Jerbi,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods , 2022 .

[110]  Gene M. Smith Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational Research , 1967 .

[111]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  A possible model for understanding the personality--intelligence interface. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[112]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Evolutionarily-conserved prefrontal-amygdalar dysfunction in early-life anxiety , 2014, Molecular Psychiatry.

[113]  Huafu Chen,et al.  Extraversion and neuroticism related to the resting-state effective connectivity of amygdala , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[114]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Prediction as a Humanitarian and Pragmatic Contribution from Human Cognitive Neuroscience , 2015, Neuron.

[115]  J. Block A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[116]  P. Matthews,et al.  Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[117]  Delong Zhang,et al.  Association between resting-state brain network topological organization and creative ability: Evidence from a multiple linear regression model , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[118]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Building better biomarkers: brain models in translational neuroimaging , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[119]  P. Costa,et al.  A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory , 2004 .

[120]  Turhan Canli,et al.  Amygdala gray matter concentration is associated with extraversion and neuroticism , 2005, Neuroreport.

[121]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data , 2017, NeuroImage.

[122]  Gerard Saucier,et al.  Orthogonal Markers for Orthogonal Factors: The Case of the Big Five , 2002 .

[123]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Guidelines for reporting an fMRI study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[124]  J. Gray,et al.  Testing Predictions From Personality Neuroscience , 2010, Psychological science.

[125]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  Largely typical patterns of resting-state functional connectivity in high-functioning adults with autism. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[126]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Heterogeneous impact of motion on fundamental patterns of developmental changes in functional connectivity during youth , 2013, NeuroImage.

[127]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Using Temporal ICA to Selectively Remove Global Noise While Preserving Global Signal in Functional MRI Data , 2017 .

[128]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[129]  R. Gur,et al.  Development of Abbreviated Nine-Item Forms of the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test , 2012, Assessment.

[130]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Behavioral Relevance of the Dynamics of the Functional Brain Connectome , 2014, Brain Connect..

[131]  Marc N. Potenza,et al.  White matter integrity and five-factor personality measures in healthy adults , 2012, NeuroImage.

[132]  Karen D. Davis,et al.  The complex minds of teenagers: Neuroanatomy of personality differs between sexes , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[133]  D. W. Fiske Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. , 1949, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[134]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[135]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  The five factors of personality and regional cortical variability in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[136]  M. Voracek,et al.  Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[137]  A. Furnham Knowing and Faking One's Five-Factor Personality Score , 1997 .

[138]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews a Meta-analysis of Sex Differences in Human Brain Structure , 2022 .

[139]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  MSM: A new flexible framework for Multimodal Surface Matching , 2014, NeuroImage.

[140]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[141]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  Noise contributions to the fMRI signal: An overview , 2016, NeuroImage.

[142]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Influences on the Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[143]  Huafu Chen,et al.  Relationship between Personality and Gray Matter Volume in Healthy Young Adults: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study , 2014, PloS one.

[144]  R. Gur,et al.  A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: Standardization and initial construct validation , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[145]  D. Boomsma,et al.  The five factor model of personality and intelligence: A twin study on the relationship between the two constructs , 2012 .

[146]  R. Gur,et al.  Computerized Neurocognitive Scanning: I. Methodology and Validation in Healthy People , 2001, Neuropsychopharmacology.