Life cycle assessment of caustic soda production: a case study in China

Abstract Life cycle assessment was conducted to estimate the environmental impact of caustic soda production. Electricity and raw salt production accounted for >90% of the overall environmental burden. These findings can be attributed to electrical consumption for bipolar electrolysis and brine extraction, diesel consumption for generating electricity during well production, and direct heavy metal emissions during drilling fluid loss and waste disposal. The key factors in reducing the overall environmental impact include optimizing raw salt production, electricity, and steam consumption efficiency, choosing drilling fluids with less toxic heavy metals (e.g., arsenic, barium, molybdenum, selenium, vanadium, beryllium, and nickel), minimizing brine leakage during brine transport, reducing the volume of drilling fluid lost, and decreasing the transport distance from brine buyers to suppliers.

[1]  Jeff Harris,et al.  The economic importance of chlor-alkali industry products, and alternatives to those products, to the Canadian economy , 1999 .

[2]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge co-incineration in a coal-based power station. , 2013, Waste management.

[3]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of three coal-based electricity generation scenarios in China , 2012 .

[5]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Life cycle assessment of four municipal solid waste management scenarios in China. , 2010, Waste management.

[6]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[7]  E. O. Vilar,et al.  Energy loss in electrochemical diaphragm process of chlorine and alkali industry – A collateral effect of the undesirable generation of chlorate , 2010 .

[8]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Characterization factors for global warming in life cycle assessment based on damages to humans and ecosystems. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Sun Zhongqiu.  Techno-Economic Analysis on Hybrid Electrostatic-Bag Filter in the Large-scale Power Plant Boiler , 2011 .

[11]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[12]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Environmental and Uncertainty Assessment: Hazardous Industry Waste as Aggregate in Cement Production , 2010 .

[13]  Carlos Barata,et al.  Identification of water soluble and particle bound compounds causing sublethal toxic effects. A field study on sediments affected by a chlor-alkali industry. , 2009, Aquatic toxicology.

[14]  Michael D. Short,et al.  A hybrid life cycle assessment of water treatment chemicals: an Australian experience , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Environmental assessment of sewage sludge as secondary raw material in cement production--a case study in China. , 2011, Waste management.

[16]  G. Norris,et al.  TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts , 2002 .