A Robust Automated Pipeline for Localizing SEEG Electrode Contacts

Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) provides a powerful tool for preoperative evaluation of patients with drug-refractory epilepsy, and can supply more quantified and systematic information for epilepsy surgeons. Precise localization of the electrode contacts is fundamental for the clinical evaluation based on SEEG. The difficulties of segmentation of the electrode contacts include handling the metal artifacts in post-implantation CT images, separating electrodes close to each other, and identifying the contacts belong to the same electrode. Here, we developed a pipeline for automatic segmenting the SEEG electrode contacts from post-implantation CT volume data. The pipeline mainly includes morphological closing determination (MCD), threshold-reduction region growing (TRRG), electrode enter point repair (EEPR) based on electrode geometric information, such as directions, angles, and distances, interconnected electrodes determination and separation (IEDS), and craniocerebral interference removing (CCIR). The robustness and generality of our algorithm was validated on 12 subjects (135 electrodes, 1812 contacts). Compared to the manual segmentation (240 contacts), automatic localization was more precise and 9 times faster. Moreover, the sensitivity was as high as 99.55% ± 0.60%, while the positive predictive value reached 95.25% ± 1.38%. In addition, our algorithm successfully separated 14 sets of interconnected electrodes, verifying the stability of accurately segmenting close electrodes. To provide more useful information about electrode contacts, we fused post-implantation CT images with pre-implantation MRI T1 images, and provided the structural and functional brain region of each contact using AAL atlas and Brainnetome parcellation. We also developed a friendly MATLAB-based graphical user interface (GUI) in which the pipeline was implemented.

[1]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  The Virtual Epileptic Patient: Individualized whole-brain models of epilepsy spread , 2017, NeuroImage.

[2]  C. Bénar,et al.  High-frequency oscillations and spikes running down after SEEG-guided thermocoagulations in the epileptogenic network of periventricular nodular heterotopia , 2019, Epilepsy Research.

[3]  Renata Guerra-Sá,et al.  The impact of sequence length and number of sequences on promoter prediction performance , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[4]  Andrea Fuster,et al.  Automated identification of intracranial depth electrodes in computed tomography data , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[5]  Lin Wang,et al.  Automatic and Precise Localization and Cortical Labeling of Subdural and Depth Intracranial Electrodes , 2017, Front. Neuroinform..

[6]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Individual brain structure and modelling predict seizure propagation , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Fabrice Wendling,et al.  Defining epileptogenic networks: Contribution of SEEG and signal analysis , 2017, Epilepsia.

[8]  Joanna M. Wardlaw,et al.  Whole Brain Magnetic Resonance Image Atlases: A Systematic Review of Existing Atlases and Caveats for Use in Population Imaging , 2017, Front. Neuroinform..

[9]  Gabriele Arnulfo,et al.  Automatic segmentation of deep intracerebral electrodes in computed tomography scans , 2015, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  P. Chauvel,et al.  Epileptogenicity of brain structures in human temporal lobe epilepsy: a quantified study from intracerebral EEG. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  L. Jehi Outcomes of Epilepsy Surgery for Epileptic Networks , 2017, Epilepsy currents.

[12]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Automatic segmentation of stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes post-implantation considering bending , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.