Process definition of preformed part machining for taking benefit of parallel kinematic machine tool kinematic performances

In the automotive or aeronautical industries, few parallel kinematic machine tools (PKM) are used in high-speed machining (HSM). However, the dynamics of these machine tool structures could be relevant for HSM since their acceleration potential is much higher than serial kinematic machine tools. However, a particularity of PKM is to have kinematic performances depending on the tool pose in the machine workspace. Thus, this paper proposes a method to increase the productivity of performed part machining with PKM by taking advantage of their kinematic performances, with the aim of decreasing the time of the non-cutting tool movements. Process parameters defined by this method are the machined part setup, the planning of the machining operations, the control of potential redundant axis and the definition of the tool paths between cutting operations. The developed method is achieved in four successive steps based on a modelling of the kinematic behaviour of a given PKM. Each step leads to define one of the process parameters with regard to the decrease of non-cutting time. Thus, this method only requires common optimization algorithms that increase it robustness and its adaptability to different structures of PKM. It is illustrated with drilling operations on preformed parts with the Tripteor X7 machine tool developed by the PCI-SCEMM Company.

[1]  Pascal Ray,et al.  Corner optimization for pocket machining , 2004 .

[2]  Pierre Bourdet,et al.  A new format for 5-axis tool path computation, using Bspline curves , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[3]  A. N. Poo,et al.  Oriented bounding box and octree based global interference detection in 5-axis machining of free-form surfaces , 2004, Comput. Aided Des..

[4]  Manfred Weck,et al.  Parallel Kinematic Machine Tools – Current State and Future Potentials , 2002 .

[5]  Khalifa H. Harib,et al.  A hexapod-based machine tool with hybrid structure: Kinematic analysis and trajectory planning , 2007 .

[6]  Christophe Tournier,et al.  Optimization of 5-axis high-speed machining using a surface based approach , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[7]  Pascal Ray,et al.  The Domain of Admissible Orientation concept: A new method for five-axis tool path optimisation , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[8]  S. F. P. Saramago,et al.  OPTIMAL TRAJECTORY PLANNING OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS IN THE PRESENCE OF MOVING OBSTACLES , 2000 .

[9]  S. Muruganandam,et al.  Selection of optimal machining parameters for hexapod machine tool , 2010 .

[10]  Zhe Wang,et al.  A study on workspace, boundary workspace analysis and workpiece positioning for parallel machine tools , 2001 .

[11]  N. Tounsi,et al.  Optimized feed scheduling in three axes machining. Part I: Fundamentals of the optimized feed scheduling strategy , 2003 .

[12]  Hélène Chanal,et al.  Geometric and Kinematic Modelling of a New Parallel Kinematic Machine Tool: The Tripteor X7 Designed by PCI , 2010 .

[13]  Sasa Zivanovic,et al.  Functional simulator of 3-axis parallel kinematic milling machine , 2009 .

[14]  Vincent Robin,et al.  Optimization of a redundant robotized cell: application to the finishing of cast parts , 2007 .

[15]  Kanchan Das,et al.  Optimization of operation and changeover time for production planning and scheduling in a flexible manufacturing system , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[16]  Jean-Yves Hascoët,et al.  Qualification of parallel kinematics machines in high-speed milling on free form surfaces , 2004 .

[17]  Taejung Kim,et al.  Toolpath generation along directions of maximum kinematic performance; a first cut at machine-optimal paths , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[18]  Jean-Pierre Merlet,et al.  Parallel Robots , 2000 .

[19]  George-Christopher Vosniakos,et al.  Motion coordination for industrial robotic systems with redundant degrees of freedom , 2009 .

[20]  Maria da Graça Marcos,et al.  Trajectory planning of redundant manipulators using genetic algorithms , 2009 .

[21]  Thomas Bonnemains,et al.  Stiffness Computation and Identification of Parallel Kinematic Machine Tools , 2009 .

[22]  Pierre Bourdet,et al.  Avoiding 5-axis singularities using tool path deformation , 2004 .

[23]  N. Tounsi,et al.  Optimized feed scheduling in three axes machining: Part II: Experimental validation , 2003 .

[24]  Z. M. Bi,et al.  Dynamic modeling and validation of a tripod-based machine tool , 2008 .

[25]  Beno Benhabib,et al.  A multi-arm robotic system for optimal sculpting , 2008 .

[26]  Türkay Dereli,et al.  Optimisation of process planning functions by genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[27]  John C. Ziegert,et al.  Fundamental Comparison of the Use of Serial and Parallel Kinematics for Machines Tools , 1999 .

[28]  Taejung Kim,et al.  On actuator reversal motions of machine tools , 2004 .

[29]  Xavier Pessoles Aide au choix du posage en usinage 5 axes continus par la modélisation du comportement cinématique des machines-outils , 2010 .

[30]  Pierre-Yves Pechard,et al.  Geometrical deviations versus smoothness in 5-axis high-speed flank milling , 2009 .

[31]  Luc Baron,et al.  Constrained multi-objective trajectory planning of parallel kinematic machines , 2009 .