PTA of Infrapopliteal Arteries: Long-term Clinical Follow-up and Analysis of Factors Influencing Clinical Outcome

This study was a retrospective analysis of patients with CLI who underwent infrapopliteal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). The main goal was to evaluate clinical and morphological factors that influence the clinical outcome of PTA in long-term follow-up. A total of 1,445 PTA procedures were performed in 1,268 patients. Main indications for PTA included gangrene, nonhealing ulcers, or rest pain. The mean number of treated arteries was 1.77 artery/limb, and the majority of lesions were type TASC D. The technical success rate of PTA was 89% of intended-to-treat arteries. The main criterion of clinical success was functional limb salvage (LS). One-year follow-up involved 1,069 limbs. Primary and secondary 1-year LS rates were 76.1 and 84.4%, respectively. The effect of clinical and morphological parameters on the 1-year LS was that the only associated disease with an adverse effect on LS rate was DM combined with dialysis. Regarding limb preprocedural status, gangrene was clearly a negative predictor. The most important factor affecting LS was the number of patent arteries post-PTA: patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 patent arteries had 1-year primary LS rates of 56.4, 73.1, 80.4, and 83%, respectively. Long-term follow-up of LS rates demonstrated secondary LS rates of 84.4, 78.8, and 73.3% at 1, 5, and 10 years. Every effort should be made to perform PTA for as many arteries as possible, even if TASC D type, to improve clinical outcome. Our study shows that repeat PTA is capable of keeping the long-term LS rate close to 75%.

[1]  S. Soimakallio,et al.  Prospective trial of infrapopliteal artery balloon angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: angiographic and clinical results. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  M. Lepäntalo,et al.  Outcome of unreconstructed chronic critical leg ischaemia. , 1996, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  P. Desgranges,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with ischemic tissue necrosis is worthwhile. , 2001, Cardiovascular surgery.

[4]  M. Passman.  Infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty for the treatment of chronic occlusive disease , 2010 .

[5]  John V. White,et al.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  E. Faglia,et al.  Regarding a comparison of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus amputation for critical limb ischemia in patients unsuitable for open surgery. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  P. Barragan,et al.  Sirolimus for below the knee lesions: Mid‐term results of SiroBTK study , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  J. Isner,et al.  Redefining the Treatment of Peripheral Artery Disease Role of Percutaneous Revascularization , 1993, Circulation.

[9]  J. Hart,et al.  Endovascular Therapy as the Primary Approach for Limb Salvage in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Experience with 443 Infrapopliteal Procedures , 2006, Vascular.

[10]  Seth B. Blattman,et al.  Infrapopliteal angioplasty for critical limb ischemia: relation of TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus class to outcome in 176 limbs. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  G. Gardiner.  Bypass Versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL): Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial , 2006 .

[12]  J. Kettenbach,et al.  PTA Versus Carbofilm-Coated Stents in Infrapopliteal Arteries: Pilot Study , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[13]  F. Vermassen,et al.  Angioplasty or Primary Stenting for Infrapopliteal Lesions: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial , 2010, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[14]  E. Kavanagh,et al.  Two-year outcome with preferential use of infrainguinal angioplasty for critical ischemia. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  J. Peregrin,et al.  Self-Expandable Stent Placement in Infrapopliteal Arteries After Unsuccessful Angioplasty Failure: One-Year Follow-up , 2008, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[16]  Geoffrey Burnstock,et al.  Roles of P2‐Purinoceptors in the Cardiovascular System , 1991, Circulation.

[17]  J. Vos,et al.  Update on PADI trial: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and drug-eluting stents for infrapopliteal lesions in critical limb ischemia. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  O. Rosales,et al.  PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Original Studies Drug Eluting Stents for Below the Knee Lesions in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: Long-Term Follow-Up , 2008 .

[19]  M. Romiti,et al.  Meta-analysis of infrapopliteal angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  H. Manninen,et al.  Infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients with uremia: when is it worth the effort? , 2009, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[21]  Second European Consensus Document on chronic critical leg ischemia. , 1992, European journal of vascular surgery.

[22]  D L Sackett,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of chronic arterial insufficiency of the lower extremities: a critical review. , 1996, Circulation.

[23]  E. Atar,et al.  Balloon angioplasty of popliteal and crural arteries in elderly with critical chronic limb ischemia. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[24]  J. Sterne,et al.  Essential Medical Statistics , 2003 .

[25]  A. Morabito,et al.  Peripheral angioplasty as the first-choice revascularization procedure in diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia: prospective study of 993 consecutive patients hospitalized and followed between 1999 and 2003. , 2005, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[26]  J. Forbes,et al.  Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[27]  Samuel S. Ahn,et al.  The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: a 10-year experience. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  I. Baumgartner,et al.  Surgical or endovascular revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia: influence of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcome. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[29]  K. Donas,et al.  Below-knee bare nitinol stent placement in high-risk patients with critical limb ischaemia and unlimited supragenicular inflow as treatment of choice. , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[30]  A. Morabito,et al.  When is a technically successful peripheral angioplasty effective in preventing above‐the‐ankle amputation in diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia? , 2007, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[31]  D. Karnabatidis,et al.  Sirolimus-Eluting versus Bare Stents after Suboptimal Infrapopliteal Angioplasty for Critical Limb Ischemia: Enduring 1-Year Angiographic and Clinical Benefit , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[32]  C. Kalbaugh,et al.  A comparison of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus amputation for critical limb ischemia in patients unsuitable for open surgery. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.