A Framework for Measuring Ontology Usage on the Web

A decade-long conscious effort by the Semantic Web community has resulted in the formation of a decentralized knowledge platform which enables data interoperability at a syntactic and semantic level. For information interoperability, at a syntactic level, RDF provides the standard format for publishing data and RDFS gives structure to the information. For semantic-level interoperability, ontologies are used which allow information dissemination and assimilation among diverse applications and systems; where information is equally accessible and useful to humans and machines. The success of the linked open data project, recognition of explicit semantics (annotated through web ontologies) by search engines and the realized potential advantages of semantic data for publishers have resulted in tremendous growth in the use of web ontologies on the web. In order to promote the adoption of ontologies (to new users), reusability of adopted ontologies, effective and efficient utilization on ontological knowledge and evolving the ontological model, erudite insight on the usage of ontologies is imperative. While ontology evaluation attempts to evaluate a developed ontology to assess its fitness and quality, it does not provide any insight into how ontologies are being used and what is the state of prevalent knowledge patterns. Realizing the importance of measuring and analysing ontology usage to advance the adoption, reusability and exploitation of ontologies, we present a semantic framework for measuring and analysing ontology usage on the Web on empirical grounding.

[1]  Michele Missikoff,et al.  Concept Similarity in SymOntos: An Enterprise Ontology Management Tool , 2002, Comput. J..

[2]  Robert Stevens,et al.  OWL Pizzas: Practical Experience of Teaching OWL-DL: Common Errors & Common Patterns , 2004, EKAW.

[3]  Boris Motik,et al.  User-Driven Ontology Evolution Management , 2002, EKAW.

[4]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Measuring Similarity between Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.

[5]  Jiao Tao,et al.  Instance Data Evaluation for Semantic Web-Based Knowledge Management Systems , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Li Ding,et al.  How the Semantic Web is Being Used: An Analysis of FOAF Documents , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Paul Buitelaar,et al.  OntoSelect: A Dynamic Ontology Library with Support for Ontology Selection , 2004 .

[8]  Yuzhong Qu,et al.  Term Dependence on the Semantic Web , 2008, SEMWEB.

[9]  Peter Mika Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics , 2005, International Semantic Web Conference.

[10]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[11]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Watson, more than a Semantic Web search engine , 2011, Semantic Web.

[12]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[13]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  OntoQA: Metric-Based Ontology Quality Analysis , 2005 .

[14]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  An Overview of OntoClean , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[15]  Steffen Staab,et al.  On-To-Knowledge Methodology (OTKM) , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[16]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[17]  Dan Brickley,et al.  FOAF Vocabulary Specification , 2004 .

[18]  Erik Simmons The usage model: a structure for richly describing product usage during design and development , 2005, 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE'05).

[19]  A. Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Evaluation of ontologies , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[20]  Wendy Hall,et al.  Building a Pragmatic Semantic Web , 2008, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[21]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  BioPortal: Ontologies and Integrated Data Resources at the Click of a Mouse , 2009 .

[22]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Linked Data Is Merely More Data , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence.

[23]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Data Driven Ontology Evaluation , 2004, LREC.

[24]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Ontology Selection: Ontology Evaluation on the Real Semantic Web , 2006, EON@WWW.

[25]  Rosa Gil,et al.  Publishing XBRL as Linked Open Data , 2009 .

[26]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  A semantic web primer , 2004 .

[27]  Raphaël Troncy,et al.  How Google is using Linked Data Today and Vision For Tomorrow , 2010, LDSI@FIA.

[28]  Jürgen Umbrich,et al.  Searching and browsing Linked Data with SWSE: The Semantic Web Search Engine , 2011, J. Web Semant..

[29]  Martin Hepp,et al.  GoodRelations: An Ontology for Describing Products and Services Offers on the Web , 2008, EKAW.

[30]  Recommended by thesis supervisor: , 2011 .

[31]  Yugyung Lee,et al.  A Panoramic Approach to Integrated Evaluation of Ontologies in the Semantic Web , 2007, EON.

[32]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  A reasonable Semantic Web , 2010, Semantic Web.

[33]  Marko Grobelnik,et al.  A SURVEY OF ONTOLOGY EVALUATION TECHNIQUES , 2005 .

[34]  Ljiljana Stojanovic,et al.  Consistent Evolution of OWL Ontologies , 2005, ESWC.

[35]  M. Hausenblas,et al.  What is the Size of the Semantic Web ? , 2008 .

[36]  Jürgen Umbrich,et al.  LDspider: An Open-source Crawling Framework for the Web of Linked Data , 2010, SEMWEB.

[37]  Ricardo Pereira e Silva,et al.  Metrics to Evaluate the Use of Object Oriented Frameworks , 2009, Comput. J..

[38]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Characterizing Knowledge on the Semantic Web with Watson , 2007, EON.

[39]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web , 2004, CIKM '04.

[40]  Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl,et al.  Reusing ontologies on the Semantic Web: A feasibility study , 2009, Data Knowl. Eng..

[41]  Dariusz Król,et al.  Editorial: Engineering Knowledge and Semantic Systems , 2012, Comput. J..

[42]  Eyal Oren,et al.  Sindice.com: Weaving the Open Linked Data , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[43]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  Creating knowledge out of interlinked data , 2010, Semantic Web.

[44]  Harith Alani,et al.  Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank , 2006, SEMWEB.

[45]  Wendy Hall,et al.  The Semantic Web Revisited , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[46]  Andreas Harth,et al.  Weaving the Pedantic Web , 2010, LDOW.

[47]  Leon van der Torre,et al.  Convivial Ambient Technologies: Requirements, Ontology and Design , 2010, Comput. J..

[48]  Yuzhong Qu,et al.  An Empirical Study of Vocabulary Relatedness and Its Application to Recommender Systems , 2011, International Semantic Web Conference.

[49]  Richard Cyganiak,et al.  Open eBusiness Ontology Usage: Investigating Community Implementation of GoodRelations , 2011, LDOW.

[50]  Mark B. Sandler,et al.  The Music Ontology , 2007, ISMIR.

[51]  Timothy W. Finin,et al.  Learning Co-reference Relations for FOAF Instances , 2010, ISWC Posters&Demos.

[52]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Cupboard - A Place to Expose Your Ontologies to Applications and the Community , 2009, ESWC.

[53]  Tom Heath,et al.  Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space , 2011, Linked Data.

[54]  Stefan Gradmann,et al.  rdfs:frbr–Towards an Implementation Model for Library Catalogs Using Semantic Web Technology , 2005 .

[55]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[56]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Using the fuzzy analytic network process (ANP) for Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A case study for a manufacturing firm , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[57]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Sig.ma: Live views on the Web of Data , 2010, J. Web Semant..

[58]  Martin Hepp,et al.  Possible Ontologies: How Reality Constrains the Development of Relevant Ontologies , 2007, IEEE Internet Computing.

[59]  Alexander Maedche,et al.  Clustering Ontology-Based Metadata in the Semantic Web , 2002, PKDD.

[60]  Li Ding,et al.  Characterizing the Semantic Web on the Web , 2006, SEMWEB.

[61]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Where to publish and find ontologies? A survey of ontology libraries , 2012, J. Web Semant..

[62]  Barry Bishop,et al.  FactForge: A fast track to the Web of data , 2011, Semantic Web.

[63]  Andreas Harth,et al.  SIOC: an approach to connect web-based communities , 2006, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[64]  Bin Hu,et al.  Smart-Context: A Context Ontology for Pervasive Mobile Computing , 2010, Comput. J..

[65]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation , 2005, SWAP.

[66]  Deborah L. McGuinness,et al.  OWL Web ontology language overview , 2004 .

[67]  Robert M. Colomb,et al.  Formal Versus Material Ontologies for Information Systems Interoperation in the Semantic Web , 2002, Comput. J..

[68]  Yuzhong Qu,et al.  Falcons: searching and browsing entities on the semantic web , 2008, WWW.