From energy efficiency towards resource efficiency within the Ecodesign Directive

Abstract The article examines the integration of resource efficiency into the European Ecodesign Directive. The purpose is to analyse the processes and stakeholder interactions, which formed the basis for integrating resource efficiency requirements into the implementing measure for vacuum cleaners and the voluntary agreement for imaging equipment. Based on the analysis, the following recommendations were made on how to strengthen the focus on resource efficiency in the Ecodesign Directive. It is legally possible within the Ecodesign Directive to set requirements to resource efficiency, but a focus on the most significant environmental impact has often resulted in a focus on energy efficiency in the use phase. Therefore, the Ecodesign Directive should continue to target resource efficiency aspects but also consider environmental aspects with a large improvement potential in addition to the most significant environmental impact. For the introduction of resource efficiency requirements into the Ecodesign Directive, these requirements have to be included in the preparatory study. It is therefore recommended to broaden the scope of the Methodology for the Ecodesign of Energy-related products and the EcoReport tool and to develop the necessary resource efficiency indicators. A continued pressure from the stakeholders is also important, and a recommendation is therefore to continue the open ecodesign process and strengthen stakeholder consultations during the preparatory study. The Directorate-General for Energy and The Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs have the leadership of the main adopted product groups within the Ecodesign Directive. DG Environment is involved in the process and has a shared leadership of the preparatory study on washing machines and dishwashers. The role of DG Environment in the Ecodesign Directive could be strengthen in order to include broader environmental aspects and drive the resource efficiency and circular economy agenda. A final recommendation is to continue to expand the work on developing standards defining test methods and verification procedures on resource efficiency.

[1]  Richard E. Brown,et al.  Savings estimates for the United States Environmental Protection Agency's ENERGY STAR voluntary product labeling program , 2008 .

[2]  Mathieux Fabrice,et al.  Integration of resource efficiency and waste management criteria in European product policies – Second phase. Report n° 1. Analysis of Durability , 2012 .

[3]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of vacuum cleaners and the effects of European regulation. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[5]  Fabrice Mathieux,et al.  Recycling of electronic displays: Analysis of pre-processing and potential ecodesign improvements , 2014 .

[6]  M. Braungart,et al.  The Upcycle: Beyond Sustainability--Designing for Abundance , 2013 .

[7]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  Combining five criteria to identify relevant products measures for resource efficiency of an energy using product , 2013 .

[8]  Mathieux Fabrice,et al.  Integration of resource efficiency and waste management criteria in European product policies – Second phase. Report n° 2: Application of the project’s methods to three product groups , 2012 .

[9]  S. Dietrich,et al.  ErP-Directive: Implementation - transposition - verification , 2012, 2012 Electronics Goes Green 2012+.

[10]  Fabrice Mathieux,et al.  Measuring the time for extracting components in end-of-life products: needs for a standardized method and aspects to be considered , 2014 .

[11]  Fabrice Mathieux,et al.  Influence of Environmental European Product Policies on Product Design - Current Status and Future Developments , 2014 .

[12]  Klaus Rennings,et al.  Increasing Energy and Resource Efficiency Through Innovation - An Explorative Analysis Using Innovation Survey Data , 2009 .

[13]  S. Suh,et al.  The material footprint of nations , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  Identification and assessment of product's measures to improve resource efficiency: the case-study of an Energy using Product , 2014 .

[15]  Fabrice Mathieux,et al.  Environmental assessment of the durability of energy-using products: method and application , 2014 .

[16]  L. Stobbe,et al.  Open questions on standby and networked standby , 2012, 2012 Electronics Goes Green 2012+.

[17]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[18]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[19]  Lucia Mancini,et al.  Potential of life cycle assessment for supporting the management of critical raw materials , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Hiroaki Takiguchi,et al.  Japanese 3R Policies Based on Material Flow Analysis , 2008 .

[21]  William McDonough,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things , 2002 .

[22]  Rosalind Malcolm.  Ecodesign Laws and the Environmental Impact of our Consumption of Products , 2011 .

[23]  H. R. Holt.  A first step in electronic ecodesign , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and The Environment.

[24]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  Analysis of end-of-life treatments of commercial refrigerating appliances: Bridging product and waste policies , 2015 .

[25]  Klaus Kögler,et al.  The European Commission’s Communication ‘Integrated Product Policy: Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking’* , 2006 .

[26]  Feng Wang,et al.  Products that go round: exploring product life extension through design , 2014 .

[27]  M. Bond.  The European Commission and Interest Groups: Towards a Deliberative Interpretation of Stakeholder Involvement in EU Policy-Making - By I. Tanasescu , 2009 .

[28]  M. Carvalho,et al.  EU energy and climate change strategy , 2012 .

[29]  Stefano Merciai,et al.  Ecodesign requirements for televisions—is energy consumption in the use phase the only relevant requirement? , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[30]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[31]  Joanna Kielin Maziarz.  Problems and challenges in the EU sustainable consumption and production action plan , 2013 .

[32]  Joanna Kielin-Maziarz.  Problems and challenges in the EU sustainable consumption and production action plan , 2013 .

[33]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Toward a systematized framework for resource efficiency indicators , 2015 .

[34]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[35]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .

[36]  Carl Dalhammar,et al.  The Application of ‘life cycle thinking’ in European environmental law: theory and practice , 2015 .

[37]  A. Remmen,et al.  Ecodesign Directive version 2.0: From Energy Efficiency to Resource Efficiency , 2015 .

[38]  Carl Dalhammar,et al.  Industry attitudes towards ecodesign standards for improved resource efficiency , 2016 .