Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms

Studies reported in the literature indicate that breast cancer risk is associated with mammographic densities. An objective, repeatable, and a quantitative measure of risk derived from mammographic densities will be of considerable use in recommending alternative screening paradigms and/or preventive measures. However, image processing efforts toward this goal seem to be sparse in the literature, and automatic and efficient methods do not seem to exist. Here, the authors describe and validate an automatic and reproducible method to segment dense tissue regions from fat within breasts from digitized mammograms using scale-based fuzzy connectivity methods. Different measures for characterizing mammographic density are computed from the segmented regions and their robustness in terms of their linear correlation across two different projections-cranio-caudal and medio-lateral-oblique-are studied. The accuracy of the method is studied by computing the area of mismatch of segmented dense regions using the proposed method and using manual outlining. A comparison between the mammographic density parameter taking into account the original intensities and that just considering the segmented area indicates that the former may have some advantages over the latter.

[1]  S. Lippman,et al.  A quantitatively scored cancer-risk assessment tool: its development and use. , 1992, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[2]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  User-Steered Image Segmentation Paradigms: Live Wire and Live Lane , 1998, Graph. Model. Image Process..

[3]  D. Hemmy,et al.  A Pentium Personal Computer‐Based Craniofacial Three‐Dimensional Imaging and Analysis System , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  N. Boyd,et al.  The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. , 1992, Cancer detection and prevention.

[6]  M A Astrahan,et al.  The detection of changes in mammographic densities. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[7]  Manuela Herman,et al.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Biomedical Data , 2003 .

[8]  Michael Brady,et al.  A Representation for Mammographic Image Processing , 1995, CVRMed.

[9]  J K Udupa,et al.  Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: longitudinal analysis of MR images--lack of correlation between changes in T2 lesion volume and clinical findings. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  J. Wolfe Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. , 1976, Radiology.

[11]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Fuzzy Connectedness and Object Definition: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications in Image Segmentation , 1996, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[14]  M Moskowitz,et al.  Mammographic patterns as markers for high-risk benign breast disease and incident cancers. , 1980, Radiology.

[15]  N F Boyd,et al.  Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images , 1996, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[16]  Supun Samarasekera,et al.  Multiple sclerosis lesion quantification using fuzzy-connectedness principles , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Dewey Odhner,et al.  3DVIEWNIX: an open, transportable, multidimensional, multimodality, multiparametric imaging software system , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[18]  W. Bilker,et al.  Late-onset minor and major depression: early evidence for common neuroanatomical substrates detected by using MRI. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[20]  R. C. Murry,et al.  Christensen’s Introduction to the Physics of Diagnostic Radiology , 1986 .

[21]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. , 2000, Medical physics.

[22]  A. Oza,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[23]  R. Chlebowski,et al.  Breast cancer chemoprevention tamoxifen: Current issues and future prospective , 1993, Cancer.

[24]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Multiscale image segmentation by integrated edge and region detection , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[25]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Scale-Based Fuzzy Connected Image Segmentation: Theory, Algorithms, and Validation , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[26]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  System for the comprehensive analysis of multiple sclerosis lesion load based on MR imagery , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[27]  J K Udupa,et al.  Differences between relapsing-remitting and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis as determined with quantitative MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[28]  Jayaram K. Udupa,et al.  Clutter-free volume rendering for magnetic resonance angiography using fuzzy connectedness , 2000, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[29]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision , 1993, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[30]  Chi-Kin Leung,et al.  Maximum Segmented Image Information Thresholding , 1998, Graph. Model. Image Process..