Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis has been performed to study the plume effects on sonic boom signature for isolated nozzle configurations. The objectives of these analyses were to provide comparison to past work using modern CFD analysis tools, to investigate the differences of high aspect ratio nozzles to circular (axisymmetric) nozzles, and to report the effects of under expanded nozzle operation on boom signature. CFD analysis was used to address the plume effects on sonic boom signature from a baseline exhaust nozzle. Nearfield pressure signatures were collected for nozzle pressure ratios (NPRs) between 6 and 10. A computer code was used to extrapolate these signatures to a ground-observed sonic boom N-wave. Trends show that there is a reduction in sonic boom N-wave signature as NPR is increased from 6 to 10. As low boom designs are developed and improved, there will be a need for understanding the interaction between the aircraft boat tail shocks and the exhaust nozzle plume. These CFD analyses will provide a baseline study for future analysis efforts. For further study, a design of experiments has been conducted to develop a hybrid method where both CFD and small scale wind tunnel testing will validate the observed trends. The CFD and testing will be used to screen a number of factors which are important to low boom propulsion integration, including boat tail angle, nozzle geometry, and the effect of spacing and stagger on nozzle pairs. To design the wind tunnel experiment, CFD was instrumental in developing a model which would provide adequate space to observe the nozzle and boat tail shock structure without interference from the wind tunnel walls.
[1]
J. Page,et al.
Extrapolation of sonic boom signatures from CFD solutions
,
2002
.
[2]
David H. Graham,et al.
Aerodynamic Design of Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration Aircraft
,
2005
.
[3]
F. J. Capone,et al.
Experimental determination of equivalent solid bodies to represent jets exhausting into a Mach 2.20 external stream
,
1969
.
[4]
R. L. Barger,et al.
Comparison of jet plume shape predictions and plume influence on sonic boom signature
,
1992
.
[5]
R. J. Mack,et al.
Determination of Extrapolation Distance with Measured Pressure Signatures from Two Low-Boom Models
,
2004
.
[6]
Robert J. Mack.
Some considerations on the integration of engine nacelles into low-boom aircraft concepts
,
1992
.