Three-Year Results of a Single-Centre Single-Blinded Randomised Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain after Lichtenstein Hernioplasty

Background and Aims: The aim of the present study was to determine whether usage of mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, would result in a decreased rate of chronic pain at 3-year follow-up. According to earlier published short-term results, differences in mesh pore size do not influence the rate of chronic pain. Material and Methods: The patients were randomized into two study groups for which meshes with similar weight but different pore size were used: the UM group received Ultrapro mesh (pore size 3–4 mm) and the OM group received Optilene LP mesh (pore size 1 mm). Pain scores were measured on a visual analog scale. The feeling of a foreign body was a yes-or-no question. Results: A total of 65 patients in the UM group and 63 patients in the OM group were included in analysis. Of the patients, 33.9% in the UM group and 15.9% in the OM group reported having experienced pain during different activities at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.025). Comparison with the results of 6-month follow-up (46.3% in the UM group, 34.3% in the OM group) showed that the rate of chronic pain had decreased significantly in the OM group (P = 0.009) but not in the UM group (P = 0.113). The feeling of a foreign body in the inguinal region was experienced by 23.1% of the patients in the UM group and by 15.9% in the OM group (P = 0.375). There was one hernia recurrence in the OM group. Severe preoperative pain and younger age were identified as risk factors for development of chronic pain. Conclusions: Mesh with larger pores, compared with mesh with smaller pores, has no advantages in reducing the rate of chronic pain. We speculate that the reason for the higher rate of chronic pain in the study group where the mesh with larger pores was used might have been the different composition of the meshes at implantation. Also, it is possible as development of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair is multifactorial, we failed to find a plausible explanation for this difference. Low recurrence rates were achieved with both meshes used in our study.

[1]  C. Nikkolo,et al.  Randomized clinical study evaluating the impact of mesh pore size on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernioplasty. , 2014, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  David C. Chen,et al.  Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives , 2014, Journal of pain research.

[3]  A. Wijsmuller,et al.  An international consensus algorithm for management of chronic postoperative inguinal pain , 2014, Hernia.

[4]  M. Rosen,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[5]  Y. Novitsky,et al.  Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice. , 2012, The Journal of surgical research.

[6]  C. Nikkolo,et al.  Three-year results of randomised clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty , 2012, Hernia.

[7]  M. Śmietański,et al.  Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene mesh with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty , 2012, Hernia.

[8]  B. Klosterhalfen,et al.  Modified classification of surgical meshes for hernia repair based on the analyses of 1,000 explanted meshes , 2012, Hernia.

[9]  C. Nikkolo,et al.  Randomised clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty , 2010, Hernia.

[10]  M. Śmietański,et al.  European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients , 2009, Hernia.

[11]  M. Śmietański,et al.  Three-year follow-up of modified Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty using lightweight poliglecaprone/polypropylene mesh , 2009, Hernia.

[12]  Uwe Klinge,et al.  New polymer for intra-abdominal meshes--PVDF copolymer. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[13]  U. Gunnarsson,et al.  Long-term pain after inguinal hernia repair in a population-based cohort; risk factors and interference with daily activities , 2008 .

[14]  U. Klinge,et al.  New objective measurement to characterize the porosity of textile implants. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[15]  R. Bleichrodt,et al.  Chronic pain after mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a systematic review. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[16]  S. Bringman,et al.  Three‐year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia , 2006, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  Dirk Weyhe,et al.  Improving Outcomes in Hernia Repair by the Use of Light Meshes—A Comparison of Different Implant Constructions Based on a Critical Appraisal of the Literature , 2006, World Journal of Surgery.

[18]  K. Müller,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Monofile Light and Heavy Polypropylene Meshes: Less Weight Does Not Mean Less Biological Response , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[19]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Chronic postoperative pain: the case of inguinal herniorrhaphy. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  P. O’Dwyer,et al.  Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair , 2005, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  Uwe Klinge,et al.  The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair , 2005, Expert review of medical devices.

[22]  P. O’Dwyer,et al.  Pain from primary inguinal hernia and the effect of repair on pain , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  U Klinge,et al.  Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. , 2002, The Journal of surgical research.

[24]  N. Scott,et al.  Five-Year Follow-Up of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic or Open Groin Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[25]  W. A. Chambers,et al.  Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[26]  F. Perkins,et al.  Pain and Functional Impairment 1 Year After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: A Nationwide Questionnaire Study , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[27]  H. Kehlet,et al.  Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair , 1999, The British journal of surgery.

[28]  M. Goldacre,et al.  Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. , 1996, International journal of epidemiology.