Development of Stainless Steels in Nuclear Industry: With Emphasis on Sodium Cooled Fast Spectrum Reactors History, Technology and Foresight

Stainless steels (SS) have earned a unique position as a widely accepted class of alloys with track record of steadily improving the performance and increasing applications from 1913 till date. This distinction is attributed to R&D, innovations and applications leading to harnessing the rare combination of properties of stainless steels, since its discovery hundred years back. Though the initial discovery of stainless steel is basically serendipity, and based on previous work, its indispensable position today, in many a wide range of applications is due to intense R&D efforts in understanding its physical, chemical, thermal and thermo-mechanical response for various chemistries and microstructures. A deliberate attempt to extend its application spectrum through various routes of manufacturing in the last century is another crucial aspect of the success story. The first part of the presentation would briefly review this exciting journey of unravelling the mysteries of stainless steels.The second part of the presentation would highlight the evolution of stainless steels in the nuclear industry, especially for the sodium cooled fast reactors. Early 70s have seen the application of stainless steels in first generation water based nuclear power plants and AISI types 304 and 316 SS was recommended for structural and core applications in fast spectrum reactors (FSR). Failure of some of the components even in the manufacturing stage and quest for improving mechanical properties and sensitisation and intergranular corrosion resistances resulted in the development of 304L, 304LN, 316L, 316LN SS during 1980-90 for further applications in FSRs. Towards core applications in intense radiation environments, three generations of stainless steels namely 20% cold worked 316 SS, D9, and D9I have been developed to yield high burnup and to triple the lifetime of the core components of the fast reactors. Towards closing the fuel cycle, again 304L SS was the workhorse material which was upgraded with newer varieties like nitric acid grade alloys for improved corrosion resistance and longer life. Manufacturing of special grades of SS and the developments in fabrication technologies was necessary in order to enhance the performance of components and to avoid failures. Welding, inspection, quality assurance and structural integrity of various components of SS for FSRs and fuel cycle facilities resulted in developments in areas like modelling, devices, methodologies and analysis. An opportunity existed for the development and application of innovative non-destructive testing techniques for robust examination of critical components.Nuclear industry is embarking a state of the art fourth generation reactors. The consequent newer generation of SS are evolving with improved properties to match the expectations of performance in increased temperature, pressure, chemical and other physical constraints. It is of paramount importance to consider the extension of the lifetime of the current reactors from 40-60 to 60-80 years for economic considerations, and in this regard innovations are necessary in the development of newer varieties of stainless steels with respect to modelling and life prediction, manufacturing, fabrication, testing and evaluation. Thus the management approach to knit a network of industry-research-academia is a key approach for way forward. A development of roadmap for robust science based technology development with foresight is a desired management strategy.

[1]  Angam Praveen,et al.  Signal quality enhancement using higher order wavelets for ultrasonic TOFD signals from austenitic stainless steel welds. , 2013, Ultrasonics.

[2]  B. Raj,et al.  Void swelling in ion irradiated (15Ni–14Cr), Ti-modified stainless steel: A study using positron annihilation and step height measurements , 2009 .

[3]  J. B. Gnanamoorthy,et al.  Relationship between Pitting and Intergranular Corrosion of Nitrogen-bearing Austenitic Stainless Steels , 1996 .

[4]  J. B. Gnanamoorthy,et al.  Pitting corrosion studies on nitrogen-bearing austenitic stainless steels , 1996 .

[5]  E. Pereloma,et al.  Phase transformations in steels , 2012 .

[6]  S. C. Chetal,et al.  Selection of materials for prototype fast breeder reactor , 2003 .

[7]  R. Dayal,et al.  Influence of Metallurgical and Chemical Variables on the Pitting Corrosion Behaviour of Nitrogen-Bearing Austenitic Stainless Steels , 1999 .

[8]  N. G. Muralidharan,et al.  Corrosion Related Failures of Austenitic Stainless Steel Components , 2002 .

[9]  B. Raj,et al.  Sensitization and Intergranular Corrosion Behavior of High Nitrogen Type 304LN Stainless Steels for Reprocessing and Waste Management Applications , 2012, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

[10]  M. D. Mathew,et al.  Influence of dynamic strain aging on the deformation behavior during ratcheting of a 316LN stainless steel , 2013 .

[11]  C. Sudha,et al.  Carburization behavior of AISI 316LN austenitic stainless steel – Experimental studies and modeling , 2010 .

[12]  J. B. Gnanamoorthy,et al.  Influence of thermal aging on the intergranular corrosion resistance of types 304LN and 316LN stainless steels , 1996 .

[13]  J. B. Gnanamoorthy,et al.  ROLE OF NITROGEN IN IMPROVING THE PASSIVE FILM STABILITY AND PITTING CORROSION RESISTANCE OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS , 1997 .

[14]  M. D. Mathew,et al.  A Comparison of Creep Deformation and Rupture Behaviour of 316L(N) Austenitic Stainless Steel in Flowing Sodium and in Air , 2013 .

[15]  U. K. Mudali,et al.  Uniform Corrosion of Austenitic Stainless Steels , 2002 .

[16]  Baldev Raj,et al.  Materials development and corrosion problems in nuclear fuel reprocessing plants , 2006 .

[17]  B. Raj,et al.  Influence of metallurgical variables on sensitisation kinetics in austenitic stainless steels , 2005 .

[18]  B. Raj,et al.  A study of the effect of titanium on the void swelling behavior of D9 steels by ion beam simulation , 2008 .

[19]  Brian D. Wirth,et al.  Recent Developments in Irradiation-Resistant Steels , 2008 .

[20]  B. Raj,et al.  Development of cladding materials for sodium-cooled fast reactors in India , 2009 .

[21]  K. Lo,et al.  Duplex Stainless Steels , 2012 .

[22]  Baldev Raj,et al.  Challenges in Materials Research for Sustainable Nuclear Energy , 2008 .

[23]  N. Parvathavarthini,et al.  Influence of chemical composition, prior deformation and prolonged thermal aging on the sensitization characteristics of austenitic stainless steels , 2002 .

[24]  U. Kamachi Mudali,et al.  Materials Development and Corrosion Issues in the Back End of Fuel Cycle , 2011 .

[25]  B. Raj,et al.  Corrosion assessment of nitric acid grade austenitic stainless steels , 2009 .

[26]  N. Parvathavarthini,et al.  Time–temperature-sensitization diagrams and critical cooling rates of different nitrogen containing austenitic stainless steels , 2010 .

[27]  Baldev Raj,et al.  Low cycle fatigue and creep–fatigue interaction behavior of 316L(N) stainless steel and life prediction by artificial neural network approach , 2003 .

[28]  B. Raj,et al.  Study of Microstructure and Property Changes in Irradiated SS316 Wrapper of Fast Breeder Test Reactor , 2009 .

[29]  A. K. Bhaduri,et al.  Comparison of creep rupture behaviour of type 316L(N) austenitic stainless steel joints welded by TIG and activated TIG welding processes , 2011 .

[30]  B. Raj,et al.  Design Principles of Nuclear Materials , 2011 .

[31]  P. De,et al.  The sensitization and stress corrosion cracking of nitrogen-containing stainless steels , 1993 .