A Comprehensive Approach for Evaluation of Stereo Correspondence Solutions in Augmented Reality

For many years, researchers have made great contributions in the fields of augmented reality (AR) and stereo vision. One of the most studied aspects of stereo vision since the 1980s has been Stereo Correspondence, which is the problem of finding the corresponding pixels in stereo images, and therefore, building a disparity map. As a result, many methods have been proposed and implemented to properly address this problem. Due to the emergence of different techniques to solve the problem of stereo correspondence, having an evaluation scheme to assess these solutions is essential. Over the past few years, different evaluation schemes have been proposed by researchers in the field to provide a testbed for assessment of the solutions based on specific criteria. Middlebury Stereo and Kitti Stereo benchmarks are two of the most popular and widely used evaluation systems through which a solution can be evaluated and compared to others. However, both of these models take a general approach towards evaluating the methods, that is, they have not been designed with an eye to the particular target application. In our proposed approach, steps are taken towards an evaluation design based on the potential applications of stereo methods, which enables us to better define the criteria for efficiency, that is, the processing time, and the required accuracy of the disparity results. Since AR has attracted more attention in the past few years, the evaluation scheme proposed in this research is designed based on outdoor AR applications which can take advantage of stereo vision techniques to obtain a depth map of the surrounding environment. This map can then be used to integrate virtual objects in the scene that respect the occlusion effects that are expected to occur based on the depth of the real objects.

[1]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Perceptual issues in augmented reality , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  D. Scharstein,et al.  A Taxonomy and Evaluation of Dense Two-Frame Stereo Correspondence Algorithms , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Stereo and Multi-Baseline Vision (SMBV 2001).

[3]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  A touring machine: Prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment , 1997, Digest of Papers. First International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[4]  Bob G. Witmer,et al.  The Perception and Estimation of Egocentric Distance in Real and Augmented Reality Environments , 2005 .

[5]  Ken Perlin,et al.  Painterly rendering for video and interaction , 2000, NPAR '00.

[6]  Mark A. Livingston,et al.  Evaluating Human Factors in Augmented Reality Systems , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  J. Sloper,et al.  Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[9]  F. A. Miles Binocular Vision and Stereopsis by Ian P. Howard and Brian J. Rogers, Oxford University Press, 1995. £90.00 (736 pages) ISBN 0 19 508476 4. , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[10]  HirschmullerHeiko Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008 .

[11]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Computer Vision - Algorithms and Applications , 2011, Texts in Computer Science.

[12]  R. Reading Binocular vision : foundations and applications , 1983 .

[13]  Eric Kolstad,et al.  Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[14]  Heiko Hirschmüller,et al.  Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information , 2008, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[15]  Xing Mei,et al.  On building an accurate stereo matching system on graphics hardware , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops).

[16]  Jonathan D. Pfautz,et al.  Depth Perception in Computer Graphics , 2000 .

[17]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  Perceptual issues in augmented reality revisited , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.